无法获得新的体外受精周期的精子:使用美国数据库的分析和结果发生率。

Fertility research and practice Pub Date : 2020-08-11 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40738-020-00082-3
Alexandra Joice Berger, Valary Raup, Ramy Abou Ghayda, Andrea Lanes, Martin Kathrins
{"title":"无法获得新的体外受精周期的精子:使用美国数据库的分析和结果发生率。","authors":"Alexandra Joice Berger,&nbsp;Valary Raup,&nbsp;Ramy Abou Ghayda,&nbsp;Andrea Lanes,&nbsp;Martin Kathrins","doi":"10.1186/s40738-020-00082-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Azoospermia is present in 10% of men presenting with infertility and surgical sperm retrieval rates for men with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction remain low. We investigated the incidence of failed fresh IVF cycles due to inability to obtain sperm and describe predictors for subsequent IVF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national IVF database was used to identify fresh IVF cycles in which there was failure to obtain sperm. Patient linkage was utilized to determine outcomes of subsequent IVF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>243,291 fresh IVF cycles were identified; 719 (0.3%) listed \"inability to obtain sperm\" as reason for embryo non-transfer. Male infertility was a factor in 537 (75%) and ejaculation was the most common anticipated sperm source (414, 57%). 713 (99.2%) cycles resulted in retrieved oocytes, but only 627 (87.2%) cryopreserved oocytes. 265 (37%) of couples underwent subsequent IVF. On multivariable analysis, lack of initial oocyte cryopreservation (OR 0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and male infertility (OR 0.14, p = 0.01) were associated with having no subsequent cycles. Partner sperm was used in 213 (80%) second cycles and sperm retrieval method was largely conserved (181/213, 85%). Embryos were transferred in 186 (70%) second cycles. Failed embryo transfers were due to repeat inability to obtain sperm in 5 (6%) cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure to obtain sperm during fresh IVF is rare, but most affected couples will not pursue further cycles of IVF after their initial failed attempt.</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"6 ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-020-00082-3","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inability to obtain sperm for fresh IVF cycles: analysis and incidence of outcomes using a database from the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Joice Berger,&nbsp;Valary Raup,&nbsp;Ramy Abou Ghayda,&nbsp;Andrea Lanes,&nbsp;Martin Kathrins\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40738-020-00082-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Azoospermia is present in 10% of men presenting with infertility and surgical sperm retrieval rates for men with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction remain low. We investigated the incidence of failed fresh IVF cycles due to inability to obtain sperm and describe predictors for subsequent IVF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national IVF database was used to identify fresh IVF cycles in which there was failure to obtain sperm. Patient linkage was utilized to determine outcomes of subsequent IVF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>243,291 fresh IVF cycles were identified; 719 (0.3%) listed \\\"inability to obtain sperm\\\" as reason for embryo non-transfer. Male infertility was a factor in 537 (75%) and ejaculation was the most common anticipated sperm source (414, 57%). 713 (99.2%) cycles resulted in retrieved oocytes, but only 627 (87.2%) cryopreserved oocytes. 265 (37%) of couples underwent subsequent IVF. On multivariable analysis, lack of initial oocyte cryopreservation (OR 0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and male infertility (OR 0.14, p = 0.01) were associated with having no subsequent cycles. Partner sperm was used in 213 (80%) second cycles and sperm retrieval method was largely conserved (181/213, 85%). Embryos were transferred in 186 (70%) second cycles. Failed embryo transfers were due to repeat inability to obtain sperm in 5 (6%) cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure to obtain sperm during fresh IVF is rare, but most affected couples will not pursue further cycles of IVF after their initial failed attempt.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-020-00082-3\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00082-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00082-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:10%的男性不育症患者有无精子症,由于生精功能障碍导致的无精子症患者手术取精率仍然很低。我们调查了由于无法获得精子而导致新鲜试管婴儿周期失败的发生率,并描述了后续试管婴儿的预测因素。方法:使用一个国家试管婴儿数据库来识别新鲜试管婴儿周期中没有获得精子。患者联系被用来确定后续IVF的结果。结果:共发现243,291个新鲜试管婴儿周期;719人(0.3%)将“无法获得精子”列为不移植胚胎的原因。男性不育是537人(75%)的一个因素,射精是最常见的精子来源(414人,57%)。713例(99.2%)卵母细胞取出,627例(87.2%)卵母细胞冷冻保存。265对(37%)夫妇随后接受了体外受精。在多变量分析中,缺乏初始卵母细胞冷冻保存(OR 0.34, p = 0.01)和男性不育(OR 0.14, p = 0.01)与没有后续周期相关。第二周期使用伴侣精子213例(80%),取精方法基本保守(181/213例,85%)。胚胎在186个(70%)第二个周期内移植。胚胎移植失败的原因是在5个(6%)周期内重复无法获得精子。结论:在新鲜试管婴儿中获得精子失败是罕见的,但大多数受影响的夫妇在首次尝试失败后不会继续进行进一步的试管婴儿周期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inability to obtain sperm for fresh IVF cycles: analysis and incidence of outcomes using a database from the United States.

Inability to obtain sperm for fresh IVF cycles: analysis and incidence of outcomes using a database from the United States.

Background: Azoospermia is present in 10% of men presenting with infertility and surgical sperm retrieval rates for men with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction remain low. We investigated the incidence of failed fresh IVF cycles due to inability to obtain sperm and describe predictors for subsequent IVF.

Methods: A national IVF database was used to identify fresh IVF cycles in which there was failure to obtain sperm. Patient linkage was utilized to determine outcomes of subsequent IVF.

Results: 243,291 fresh IVF cycles were identified; 719 (0.3%) listed "inability to obtain sperm" as reason for embryo non-transfer. Male infertility was a factor in 537 (75%) and ejaculation was the most common anticipated sperm source (414, 57%). 713 (99.2%) cycles resulted in retrieved oocytes, but only 627 (87.2%) cryopreserved oocytes. 265 (37%) of couples underwent subsequent IVF. On multivariable analysis, lack of initial oocyte cryopreservation (OR 0.34, p = 0.01) and male infertility (OR 0.14, p = 0.01) were associated with having no subsequent cycles. Partner sperm was used in 213 (80%) second cycles and sperm retrieval method was largely conserved (181/213, 85%). Embryos were transferred in 186 (70%) second cycles. Failed embryo transfers were due to repeat inability to obtain sperm in 5 (6%) cycles.

Conclusions: Failure to obtain sperm during fresh IVF is rare, but most affected couples will not pursue further cycles of IVF after their initial failed attempt.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信