迈向结直肠癌肝转移的精准医学。

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Juan Manuel O'Connor, Fernando Sanchez Loria
{"title":"迈向结直肠癌肝转移的精准医学。","authors":"Juan Manuel O'Connor, Fernando Sanchez Loria","doi":"10.2217/hep-2020-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent disease globally; it is the third leading cause in cancer incidence and the second cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. According to the data published by GLOBOCAN 2018 CRC incidence rates in developed countries are approximately threefold higher than in transitioning countries; however, CRC related mortality rates do not differ significantly due to the fact that average case fatality is higher in lower human developments index settings. Liver is the most common site of metastasis from colorectal cancers (50–60% of the cases). Close to a third of patients have liver metastases either at the time of diagnosis (synchronous in 1/3 of cases) or during the disease course (metachronous in 2/3 of cases) [2]. The approach to the treatment of liver metastases from CRC includes surgical resection, in various modalities, some examples are one-stage hepatectomy, two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) with portal vein ligation or embolization, TSH with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) [3] or ultrasound guided one stage hepatectomy associated with or without ablating methods such as radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation [4] and systemic treatment, with different chemotherapy protocols in combination with biological agents, such as antiangiogenic therapy or I-EGFR (panitumumab or cetuximab). The strategic alliance between the surgical oncologist and the medical oncologist has been defined through the International Consensus Meeting (Expert Group on OncoSurgery management of Liver Metastases) published in 2012 [5]. One of the most important issues is to define the resectability criteria, which have varied over time as well as the timing of chemotherapy, either neoadjuvant, perioperative or postresection of metastases, with a pseudoadjuvant criteria. The most important issue in almost all cases is multidisciplinary work to guarantee the best therapeutic results and survival benefits for the individual patient. Specialized hospitals with multidisciplinary tumor boards including radiologists, pathologists, oncologists and liver surgeons show better resectability and survival rates than general hospitals or nonspecialized centers. Five year survival has increased from less than 8%, with palliative chemotherapy, to 25–40% using multimodal management including chemotherapy and surgical procedures [6]. On the other hand, resectability criteria have been defined on the basis of technical and oncologic data, the latter according to the presence or lack of extrahepatic disease and progression of disease after systemic treatment, both variables are associated with poor prognosis [7]. There is growing interest in directly assessing tumor biology by molecular profiling and integrating biomarkers into prognostication systems [8]. The KRAS gene has been extensively studied, as there was found to be a high concordance of KRAS status between primary CRC and colorectal liver metastases, this biomarker can be evaluated upon biopsy or resected specimens from the primary tumor [9]. The most recent publications of new and more effective chemotherapies and novel surgical techniques developed in recent years have increased the number of resectable patients with colorectal liver metastases [10]. The caveat of","PeriodicalId":44854,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2020-0011","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards precision medicine in colorectal cancer liver metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Manuel O'Connor, Fernando Sanchez Loria\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/hep-2020-0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent disease globally; it is the third leading cause in cancer incidence and the second cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. According to the data published by GLOBOCAN 2018 CRC incidence rates in developed countries are approximately threefold higher than in transitioning countries; however, CRC related mortality rates do not differ significantly due to the fact that average case fatality is higher in lower human developments index settings. Liver is the most common site of metastasis from colorectal cancers (50–60% of the cases). Close to a third of patients have liver metastases either at the time of diagnosis (synchronous in 1/3 of cases) or during the disease course (metachronous in 2/3 of cases) [2]. The approach to the treatment of liver metastases from CRC includes surgical resection, in various modalities, some examples are one-stage hepatectomy, two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) with portal vein ligation or embolization, TSH with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) [3] or ultrasound guided one stage hepatectomy associated with or without ablating methods such as radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation [4] and systemic treatment, with different chemotherapy protocols in combination with biological agents, such as antiangiogenic therapy or I-EGFR (panitumumab or cetuximab). The strategic alliance between the surgical oncologist and the medical oncologist has been defined through the International Consensus Meeting (Expert Group on OncoSurgery management of Liver Metastases) published in 2012 [5]. One of the most important issues is to define the resectability criteria, which have varied over time as well as the timing of chemotherapy, either neoadjuvant, perioperative or postresection of metastases, with a pseudoadjuvant criteria. The most important issue in almost all cases is multidisciplinary work to guarantee the best therapeutic results and survival benefits for the individual patient. Specialized hospitals with multidisciplinary tumor boards including radiologists, pathologists, oncologists and liver surgeons show better resectability and survival rates than general hospitals or nonspecialized centers. Five year survival has increased from less than 8%, with palliative chemotherapy, to 25–40% using multimodal management including chemotherapy and surgical procedures [6]. On the other hand, resectability criteria have been defined on the basis of technical and oncologic data, the latter according to the presence or lack of extrahepatic disease and progression of disease after systemic treatment, both variables are associated with poor prognosis [7]. There is growing interest in directly assessing tumor biology by molecular profiling and integrating biomarkers into prognostication systems [8]. The KRAS gene has been extensively studied, as there was found to be a high concordance of KRAS status between primary CRC and colorectal liver metastases, this biomarker can be evaluated upon biopsy or resected specimens from the primary tumor [9]. The most recent publications of new and more effective chemotherapies and novel surgical techniques developed in recent years have increased the number of resectable patients with colorectal liver metastases [10]. The caveat of\",\"PeriodicalId\":44854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatic Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2020-0011\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2020-0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2020-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards precision medicine in colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent disease globally; it is the third leading cause in cancer incidence and the second cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. According to the data published by GLOBOCAN 2018 CRC incidence rates in developed countries are approximately threefold higher than in transitioning countries; however, CRC related mortality rates do not differ significantly due to the fact that average case fatality is higher in lower human developments index settings. Liver is the most common site of metastasis from colorectal cancers (50–60% of the cases). Close to a third of patients have liver metastases either at the time of diagnosis (synchronous in 1/3 of cases) or during the disease course (metachronous in 2/3 of cases) [2]. The approach to the treatment of liver metastases from CRC includes surgical resection, in various modalities, some examples are one-stage hepatectomy, two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) with portal vein ligation or embolization, TSH with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) [3] or ultrasound guided one stage hepatectomy associated with or without ablating methods such as radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation [4] and systemic treatment, with different chemotherapy protocols in combination with biological agents, such as antiangiogenic therapy or I-EGFR (panitumumab or cetuximab). The strategic alliance between the surgical oncologist and the medical oncologist has been defined through the International Consensus Meeting (Expert Group on OncoSurgery management of Liver Metastases) published in 2012 [5]. One of the most important issues is to define the resectability criteria, which have varied over time as well as the timing of chemotherapy, either neoadjuvant, perioperative or postresection of metastases, with a pseudoadjuvant criteria. The most important issue in almost all cases is multidisciplinary work to guarantee the best therapeutic results and survival benefits for the individual patient. Specialized hospitals with multidisciplinary tumor boards including radiologists, pathologists, oncologists and liver surgeons show better resectability and survival rates than general hospitals or nonspecialized centers. Five year survival has increased from less than 8%, with palliative chemotherapy, to 25–40% using multimodal management including chemotherapy and surgical procedures [6]. On the other hand, resectability criteria have been defined on the basis of technical and oncologic data, the latter according to the presence or lack of extrahepatic disease and progression of disease after systemic treatment, both variables are associated with poor prognosis [7]. There is growing interest in directly assessing tumor biology by molecular profiling and integrating biomarkers into prognostication systems [8]. The KRAS gene has been extensively studied, as there was found to be a high concordance of KRAS status between primary CRC and colorectal liver metastases, this biomarker can be evaluated upon biopsy or resected specimens from the primary tumor [9]. The most recent publications of new and more effective chemotherapies and novel surgical techniques developed in recent years have increased the number of resectable patients with colorectal liver metastases [10]. The caveat of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatic Oncology
Hepatic Oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Primary liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and the third most common cause of death from malignant disease. Traditionally more common in developing countries, hepatocellular carcinoma is becoming increasingly prevalent in the Western world, primarily due to an increase in hepatitis C virus infection. Emerging risk factors, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and obesity are also of concern for the future. In addition, metastatic tumors of the liver are more common than primary disease. Some studies report hepatic metastases in as many as 40 to 50% of adult patients with extrahepatic primary tumors. Hepatic Oncology publishes original research studies and reviews addressing preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to all types of cancer of the liver, in both the adult and pediatric populations. The journal also highlights significant advances in basic and translational research, and places them in context for future therapy. Hepatic Oncology provides a forum to report and debate all aspects of cancer of the liver and bile ducts. The journal publishes original research studies, full reviews and commentaries, with all articles subject to independent review by a minimum of three independent experts. Unsolicited article proposals are welcomed and authors are required to comply fully with the journal''s Disclosure & Conflict of Interest Policy as well as major publishing guidelines, including ICMJE and GPP3.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信