社区卫生中心提供者对循证哮喘指南的依从性

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING
Melissa R Penkalski, Maria Kenneally
{"title":"社区卫生中心提供者对循证哮喘指南的依从性","authors":"Melissa R Penkalski,&nbsp;Maria Kenneally","doi":"10.1891/2380-9418.9.1.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Improved outcomes for patients with asthma have been proven with the use of the Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3) evidence-based asthma guidelines. These clinical guidelines are tools developed for providers to direct appropriate high-quality patient care that leads to positive outcomes. However, research has shown health care providers do not routinely follow the evidence-based asthma guidelines adequately. <b>Objective:</b> To develop and implement an evidence-based asthma protocol in a community clinic and improve provider adherence and attitudes/beliefs to the EPR-3 guidelines resulting in improved asthma outcomes, asthma control, and self-management for patients with asthma. <b>Methods:</b> The study was conducted in 2 parts over a period of 3 months. First, all medical providers at a community clinic were invited to participate in the research study. The intervention included implementing the asthma protocol within the current electronic health record (EHR). A pre- and postintervention questionnaire measuring provider's adherence and attitudes to evidence-based practice was administered. In addition, pre- and postclinic aggregate data for International Classification of Diseases codes specific to asthma that correlate to 7 identified aims based on the EPR-3 guidelines were collected. <b>Results:</b> Results show statistical significance among the provider attitudes/beliefs with the intervention, the greatest effect being found for the medical doctors. Four of the 7 aims showed improvement. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings of this application research quality improvement study indicate that providing necessary tools and resources needed to adhere to evidence-based asthma guidelines can positively affect providers' adherence and attitudes/beliefs toward evidence-based guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"128-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provider Adherence to Evidence-Based Asthma Guidelines in a Community Health Center.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa R Penkalski,&nbsp;Maria Kenneally\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/2380-9418.9.1.128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Improved outcomes for patients with asthma have been proven with the use of the Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3) evidence-based asthma guidelines. These clinical guidelines are tools developed for providers to direct appropriate high-quality patient care that leads to positive outcomes. However, research has shown health care providers do not routinely follow the evidence-based asthma guidelines adequately. <b>Objective:</b> To develop and implement an evidence-based asthma protocol in a community clinic and improve provider adherence and attitudes/beliefs to the EPR-3 guidelines resulting in improved asthma outcomes, asthma control, and self-management for patients with asthma. <b>Methods:</b> The study was conducted in 2 parts over a period of 3 months. First, all medical providers at a community clinic were invited to participate in the research study. The intervention included implementing the asthma protocol within the current electronic health record (EHR). A pre- and postintervention questionnaire measuring provider's adherence and attitudes to evidence-based practice was administered. In addition, pre- and postclinic aggregate data for International Classification of Diseases codes specific to asthma that correlate to 7 identified aims based on the EPR-3 guidelines were collected. <b>Results:</b> Results show statistical significance among the provider attitudes/beliefs with the intervention, the greatest effect being found for the medical doctors. Four of the 7 aims showed improvement. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings of this application research quality improvement study indicate that providing necessary tools and resources needed to adhere to evidence-based asthma guidelines can positively affect providers' adherence and attitudes/beliefs toward evidence-based guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"128-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/2380-9418.9.1.128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/2380-9418.9.1.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:使用专家小组报告3 (EPR-3)循证哮喘指南已证明哮喘患者的预后得到改善。这些临床指南是为提供者开发的工具,用于指导适当的高质量患者护理,从而产生积极的结果。然而,研究表明,卫生保健提供者并没有充分遵循循证哮喘指南。目的:在社区诊所制定和实施循证哮喘方案,提高提供者对EPR-3指南的依从性和态度/信念,从而改善哮喘结局、哮喘控制和哮喘患者的自我管理。方法:研究分为两部分,为期3个月。首先,邀请一家社区诊所的所有医疗服务提供者参与这项研究。干预措施包括在当前电子健康记录(EHR)中实施哮喘协议。在干预前和干预后进行问卷调查,测量提供者对循证实践的依从性和态度。此外,收集了基于EPR-3指南的与7个确定目标相关的哮喘国际疾病分类代码的临床前和临床后汇总数据。结果:干预对服务提供者态度/信念的影响有统计学意义,其中对医生的影响最大。7个目标中有4个显示出改善。结论:本应用研究质量改进研究的结果表明,提供必要的工具和资源来坚持循证哮喘指南可以积极影响提供者对循证指南的依从性和态度/信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provider Adherence to Evidence-Based Asthma Guidelines in a Community Health Center.

Background: Improved outcomes for patients with asthma have been proven with the use of the Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3) evidence-based asthma guidelines. These clinical guidelines are tools developed for providers to direct appropriate high-quality patient care that leads to positive outcomes. However, research has shown health care providers do not routinely follow the evidence-based asthma guidelines adequately. Objective: To develop and implement an evidence-based asthma protocol in a community clinic and improve provider adherence and attitudes/beliefs to the EPR-3 guidelines resulting in improved asthma outcomes, asthma control, and self-management for patients with asthma. Methods: The study was conducted in 2 parts over a period of 3 months. First, all medical providers at a community clinic were invited to participate in the research study. The intervention included implementing the asthma protocol within the current electronic health record (EHR). A pre- and postintervention questionnaire measuring provider's adherence and attitudes to evidence-based practice was administered. In addition, pre- and postclinic aggregate data for International Classification of Diseases codes specific to asthma that correlate to 7 identified aims based on the EPR-3 guidelines were collected. Results: Results show statistical significance among the provider attitudes/beliefs with the intervention, the greatest effect being found for the medical doctors. Four of the 7 aims showed improvement. Conclusions: The findings of this application research quality improvement study indicate that providing necessary tools and resources needed to adhere to evidence-based asthma guidelines can positively affect providers' adherence and attitudes/beliefs toward evidence-based guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信