通过TREC、TREC/KREC系统筛查新生儿原发性免疫缺陷及TREC/KREC的局限性全面审查。

Q2 Medicine
Khyber Shinwari, Mikhail Bolkov, Irina A Tuzankina, Valery A Chereshnev
{"title":"通过TREC、TREC/KREC系统筛查新生儿原发性免疫缺陷及TREC/KREC的局限性全面审查。","authors":"Khyber Shinwari,&nbsp;Mikhail Bolkov,&nbsp;Irina A Tuzankina,&nbsp;Valery A Chereshnev","doi":"10.2174/1871523019999200730171600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Newborn screening (NBS) by quantifying T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) and Kappa receptor excision circles in neonatal dried blood spots (DBS) enables early diagnosis of different types of primary immune deficiencies. Global newborn screening for PID, using an assay to detect T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) in dried blood spots (DBS), is now being performed in all states in the United States. In this review, we discuss the development and outcomes of TREC, TREC/KREC combines screening, and continued challenges to implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the diagnostic performance of published articles for TREC and TREC/ KREC based NBS for PID and its different types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Different research resources were used to get an approach for the published data of TREС and KREC based NBS for PID like PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Research gate EMBASE. We extracted TREC and KREC screening Publisher with years of publication, content and cut-off values, and a number of retests, repeat DBS, and referrals from the different published pilot, pilot cohort, Case series, and cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included the results of TREC, combined TREC/KREC system based NBS screening from different research articles, and divided these results between the Pilot studies, case series, and cohort. For each of these studies, different parameter data are excluded from different articles. Thirteen studies were included, re-confirming 89 known SCID cases in case series and reporting 53 new SCID cases in 3.15 million newborns. Individual TREC contents in all SCID patients were <25 TRECs/μl (except in those evaluated with the New York State assay).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TREC and KREC sensitivity for typical SCID and other types of PID was 100 %. It shows its importance and anticipating the significance of implementation in different undeveloped and developed countries in the NBS program in upcoming years. Data adapting the screening algorithm for pre-term/ill infants reduce the amount of false-positive test results.</p>","PeriodicalId":35423,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Newborn Screening through TREC, TREC/KREC System for Primary Immunodeficiency with limitation of TREC/KREC. Comprehensive Review.\",\"authors\":\"Khyber Shinwari,&nbsp;Mikhail Bolkov,&nbsp;Irina A Tuzankina,&nbsp;Valery A Chereshnev\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1871523019999200730171600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Newborn screening (NBS) by quantifying T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) and Kappa receptor excision circles in neonatal dried blood spots (DBS) enables early diagnosis of different types of primary immune deficiencies. Global newborn screening for PID, using an assay to detect T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) in dried blood spots (DBS), is now being performed in all states in the United States. In this review, we discuss the development and outcomes of TREC, TREC/KREC combines screening, and continued challenges to implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the diagnostic performance of published articles for TREC and TREC/ KREC based NBS for PID and its different types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Different research resources were used to get an approach for the published data of TREС and KREC based NBS for PID like PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Research gate EMBASE. We extracted TREC and KREC screening Publisher with years of publication, content and cut-off values, and a number of retests, repeat DBS, and referrals from the different published pilot, pilot cohort, Case series, and cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included the results of TREC, combined TREC/KREC system based NBS screening from different research articles, and divided these results between the Pilot studies, case series, and cohort. For each of these studies, different parameter data are excluded from different articles. Thirteen studies were included, re-confirming 89 known SCID cases in case series and reporting 53 new SCID cases in 3.15 million newborns. Individual TREC contents in all SCID patients were <25 TRECs/μl (except in those evaluated with the New York State assay).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TREC and KREC sensitivity for typical SCID and other types of PID was 100 %. It shows its importance and anticipating the significance of implementation in different undeveloped and developed countries in the NBS program in upcoming years. Data adapting the screening algorithm for pre-term/ill infants reduce the amount of false-positive test results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871523019999200730171600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871523019999200730171600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

新生儿筛查(NBS)通过量化新生儿干血斑(DBS)中的T细胞受体切除圈(TRECs)和Kappa受体切除圈,可以早期诊断不同类型的原发性免疫缺陷。全球新生儿PID筛查,使用一种检测干血斑(DBS)中的t细胞受体切除圈(TREC)的方法,目前正在美国所有州进行。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了TREC的发展和结果,TREC/KREC联合筛查,以及实施中的持续挑战。目的:评价已发表的TREC和基于TREC/ KREC的NBS对不同类型PID的诊断效果。方法:利用PubMed、Scopus、Google Scholar、research gate EMBASE等不同的研究资源,对TREС和基于KREC的PID NBS的已发表数据进行梳理。我们提取了TREC和KREC筛选出版商,包括发表年份、内容和临界值,以及从不同已发表的试点、试点队列、病例系列和队列研究中进行的大量重新测试、重复DBS和转诊。结果:我们从不同的研究文章中纳入了TREC和基于NBS筛选的TREC/KREC联合系统的结果,并将这些结果分为试点研究、病例系列和队列。对于每项研究,从不同的文章中排除了不同的参数数据。纳入了13项研究,在病例系列中重新确认了89例已知的SCID病例,并报告了315万新生儿中53例新的SCID病例。结论:TREC和KREC对典型SCID和其他类型PID的敏感性为100%。这表明了它的重要性,并预测了未来几年在不同的欠发达国家和发达国家实施国家统计局计划的意义。采用早产儿/患病婴儿筛查算法的数据减少了假阳性检测结果的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Newborn Screening through TREC, TREC/KREC System for Primary Immunodeficiency with limitation of TREC/KREC. Comprehensive Review.

Introduction: Newborn screening (NBS) by quantifying T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) and Kappa receptor excision circles in neonatal dried blood spots (DBS) enables early diagnosis of different types of primary immune deficiencies. Global newborn screening for PID, using an assay to detect T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) in dried blood spots (DBS), is now being performed in all states in the United States. In this review, we discuss the development and outcomes of TREC, TREC/KREC combines screening, and continued challenges to implementation.

Objective: To review the diagnostic performance of published articles for TREC and TREC/ KREC based NBS for PID and its different types.

Methods: Different research resources were used to get an approach for the published data of TREС and KREC based NBS for PID like PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Research gate EMBASE. We extracted TREC and KREC screening Publisher with years of publication, content and cut-off values, and a number of retests, repeat DBS, and referrals from the different published pilot, pilot cohort, Case series, and cohort studies.

Results: We included the results of TREC, combined TREC/KREC system based NBS screening from different research articles, and divided these results between the Pilot studies, case series, and cohort. For each of these studies, different parameter data are excluded from different articles. Thirteen studies were included, re-confirming 89 known SCID cases in case series and reporting 53 new SCID cases in 3.15 million newborns. Individual TREC contents in all SCID patients were <25 TRECs/μl (except in those evaluated with the New York State assay).

Conclusion: TREC and KREC sensitivity for typical SCID and other types of PID was 100 %. It shows its importance and anticipating the significance of implementation in different undeveloped and developed countries in the NBS program in upcoming years. Data adapting the screening algorithm for pre-term/ill infants reduce the amount of false-positive test results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry
Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Anti-Inflammatory & Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry aims to cover all the latest and outstanding developments in medicinal chemistry and rational drug design for the discovery of new anti-inflammatory & anti-allergy agents. Publishing a series of timely in-depth reviews written by leaders in the field covering a range of current topics, Anti-Inflammatory & Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry is an essential journal for every medicinal chemist who wishes to be kept informed and up-to-date with the latest and most important developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信