对肯尼亚基利菲初级卫生保健工作者实施精神卫生差距行动规划干预指南(mhGAP-IG)并进行试点测试。

Global mental health (Cambridge, England) Pub Date : 2020-05-18 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2020.6
Mary A Bitta, Symon M Kariuki, Anisa Omar, Leonard Nasoro, Monica Njeri, Cyprian Kiambu, Linnet Ongeri, Charles R J C Newton
{"title":"对肯尼亚基利菲初级卫生保健工作者实施精神卫生差距行动规划干预指南(mhGAP-IG)并进行试点测试。","authors":"Mary A Bitta,&nbsp;Symon M Kariuki,&nbsp;Anisa Omar,&nbsp;Leonard Nasoro,&nbsp;Monica Njeri,&nbsp;Cyprian Kiambu,&nbsp;Linnet Ongeri,&nbsp;Charles R J C Newton","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2020.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little data exists about the methodology of contextualizing version two of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) in resource-poor settings. This paper describes the contextualisation and pilot testing of the guide in Kilifi, Kenya.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Contextualisation was conducted as a collaboration between the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) and Kilifi County Government's Department of Health (KCGH) between 2016 and 2018. It adapted a mixed-method design and involved a situational analysis, stakeholder engagement, local adaptation and pilot testing of the adapted guide. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis to identify key facilitators and barriers to the implementation process. Pre- and post-training scores of the adapted guide were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Human resource for mental health in Kilifi is strained with limited infrastructure and outdated legislation. Barriers to implementation included few specialists for referral, unreliable drug supply, difficulty in translating the guide to Kiswahili language, lack of clarity of the roles of KWTRP and KCGH in the implementation process and the unwillingness of the biomedical practitioners to collaborate with traditional health practitioners to enhance referrals to hospital. In the adaptation process, stakeholders recommended the exclusion of child and adolescent mental and behavioural problems, as well as dementia modules from the final version of the guide. Pilot testing of the adapted guide showed a significant improvement in the post-training scores: 66.3% (95% CI 62.4-70.8) <i>v.</i> 76.6% (95% CI 71.6-79.2) (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adapted mhGAP-IG version two can be used across coastal Kenya to train primary healthcare providers. However, successful implementation in Kilifi will require a review of new evidence on the burden of disease, improvements in the mental health system and sustained dialogue among stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":520633,"journal":{"name":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","volume":" ","pages":"e11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/gmh.2020.6","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextualizing and pilot testing the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) to primary healthcare workers in Kilifi, Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Mary A Bitta,&nbsp;Symon M Kariuki,&nbsp;Anisa Omar,&nbsp;Leonard Nasoro,&nbsp;Monica Njeri,&nbsp;Cyprian Kiambu,&nbsp;Linnet Ongeri,&nbsp;Charles R J C Newton\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/gmh.2020.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little data exists about the methodology of contextualizing version two of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) in resource-poor settings. This paper describes the contextualisation and pilot testing of the guide in Kilifi, Kenya.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Contextualisation was conducted as a collaboration between the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) and Kilifi County Government's Department of Health (KCGH) between 2016 and 2018. It adapted a mixed-method design and involved a situational analysis, stakeholder engagement, local adaptation and pilot testing of the adapted guide. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis to identify key facilitators and barriers to the implementation process. Pre- and post-training scores of the adapted guide were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Human resource for mental health in Kilifi is strained with limited infrastructure and outdated legislation. Barriers to implementation included few specialists for referral, unreliable drug supply, difficulty in translating the guide to Kiswahili language, lack of clarity of the roles of KWTRP and KCGH in the implementation process and the unwillingness of the biomedical practitioners to collaborate with traditional health practitioners to enhance referrals to hospital. In the adaptation process, stakeholders recommended the exclusion of child and adolescent mental and behavioural problems, as well as dementia modules from the final version of the guide. Pilot testing of the adapted guide showed a significant improvement in the post-training scores: 66.3% (95% CI 62.4-70.8) <i>v.</i> 76.6% (95% CI 71.6-79.2) (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adapted mhGAP-IG version two can be used across coastal Kenya to train primary healthcare providers. However, successful implementation in Kilifi will require a review of new evidence on the burden of disease, improvements in the mental health system and sustained dialogue among stakeholders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/gmh.2020.6\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2020.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global mental health (Cambridge, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2020.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:关于在资源贫乏环境下将第二版《精神卫生差距行动规划干预指南》(mhGAP-IG)背景化的方法的数据很少。本文描述了该指南在肯尼亚基利菲的背景化和试点测试。方法:在2016年至2018年期间,kemri -威康信托研究计划(KWTRP)和基利菲县政府卫生部(KCGH)合作进行了情境化研究。它采用了混合方法设计,包括情景分析、利益相关者参与、地方适应和改编指南的试点测试。使用内容分析对定性数据进行分析,以确定实施过程中的关键促进因素和障碍。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较改编指南的训练前和训练后得分。结果:基利菲精神卫生人力资源紧张,基础设施有限,立法过时。实施的障碍包括转诊专家少、药品供应不可靠、难以将指南翻译成斯瓦希里语、KWTRP和KCGH在实施过程中的作用不明确以及生物医学从业人员不愿与传统保健从业人员合作以加强转诊到医院。在适应过程中,利益攸关方建议将儿童和青少年的精神和行为问题以及痴呆症模块从指南的最终版本中排除。改编指南的试点测试显示训练后评分显著改善:66.3% (95% CI 62.4-70.8) vs 76.6% (95% CI 71.6-79.2) (p < 0.001)。结论:修订后的mhGAP-IG第二版可在肯尼亚沿海地区用于培训初级卫生保健提供者。然而,在基利菲的成功实施将需要审查有关疾病负担的新证据、改善精神卫生系统以及利益攸关方之间的持续对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Contextualizing and pilot testing the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) to primary healthcare workers in Kilifi, Kenya.

Contextualizing and pilot testing the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) to primary healthcare workers in Kilifi, Kenya.

Contextualizing and pilot testing the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) to primary healthcare workers in Kilifi, Kenya.

Contextualizing and pilot testing the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) to primary healthcare workers in Kilifi, Kenya.

Background: Little data exists about the methodology of contextualizing version two of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) in resource-poor settings. This paper describes the contextualisation and pilot testing of the guide in Kilifi, Kenya.

Methods: Contextualisation was conducted as a collaboration between the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) and Kilifi County Government's Department of Health (KCGH) between 2016 and 2018. It adapted a mixed-method design and involved a situational analysis, stakeholder engagement, local adaptation and pilot testing of the adapted guide. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis to identify key facilitators and barriers to the implementation process. Pre- and post-training scores of the adapted guide were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: Human resource for mental health in Kilifi is strained with limited infrastructure and outdated legislation. Barriers to implementation included few specialists for referral, unreliable drug supply, difficulty in translating the guide to Kiswahili language, lack of clarity of the roles of KWTRP and KCGH in the implementation process and the unwillingness of the biomedical practitioners to collaborate with traditional health practitioners to enhance referrals to hospital. In the adaptation process, stakeholders recommended the exclusion of child and adolescent mental and behavioural problems, as well as dementia modules from the final version of the guide. Pilot testing of the adapted guide showed a significant improvement in the post-training scores: 66.3% (95% CI 62.4-70.8) v. 76.6% (95% CI 71.6-79.2) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The adapted mhGAP-IG version two can be used across coastal Kenya to train primary healthcare providers. However, successful implementation in Kilifi will require a review of new evidence on the burden of disease, improvements in the mental health system and sustained dialogue among stakeholders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信