不满意的避孕选择在美国妇女中由于成本

Q2 Medicine
Kristen Lagasse Burke , Joseph E. Potter , Kari White
{"title":"不满意的避孕选择在美国妇女中由于成本","authors":"Kristen Lagasse Burke ,&nbsp;Joseph E. Potter ,&nbsp;Kari White","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine prevalence and characteristics associated with cost barriers to preferred contraceptive use.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Among a nationally representative sample of women at risk of unplanned pregnancy in 2015–2017, we used Poisson regression to assess characteristics associated preferring a(nother) method in the absence of cost.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 22% preferred to use a(nother) method. Women using less-effective methods, who were Black or Hispanic, ages 15–24 and had low incomes, were more likely to report cost barriers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Using a preferred method is an indicator of access to care and reproductive autonomy. These results provide a benchmark to track the impact of policy changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100032","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unsatisfied contraceptive preferences due to cost among women in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Kristen Lagasse Burke ,&nbsp;Joseph E. Potter ,&nbsp;Kari White\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine prevalence and characteristics associated with cost barriers to preferred contraceptive use.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Among a nationally representative sample of women at risk of unplanned pregnancy in 2015–2017, we used Poisson regression to assess characteristics associated preferring a(nother) method in the absence of cost.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 22% preferred to use a(nother) method. Women using less-effective methods, who were Black or Hispanic, ages 15–24 and had low incomes, were more likely to report cost barriers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Using a preferred method is an indicator of access to care and reproductive autonomy. These results provide a benchmark to track the impact of policy changes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100032\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

目的探讨首选避孕药具使用成本障碍的患病率和特点。研究设计在2015-2017年具有全国代表性的有意外怀孕风险的女性样本中,我们使用泊松回归来评估在没有成本的情况下偏好(另一种)方法的相关特征。结果总体而言,22%的人倾向于使用另一种方法。使用效果较差的方法的女性,年龄在15-24岁、收入较低的黑人或西班牙裔女性,更有可能报告成本障碍。结论择优避孕是获得护理和生殖自主的一个指标。这些结果为跟踪政策变化的影响提供了一个基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unsatisfied contraceptive preferences due to cost among women in the United States

Objectives

To examine prevalence and characteristics associated with cost barriers to preferred contraceptive use.

Study design

Among a nationally representative sample of women at risk of unplanned pregnancy in 2015–2017, we used Poisson regression to assess characteristics associated preferring a(nother) method in the absence of cost.

Results

Overall, 22% preferred to use a(nother) method. Women using less-effective methods, who were Black or Hispanic, ages 15–24 and had low incomes, were more likely to report cost barriers.

Conclusions

Using a preferred method is an indicator of access to care and reproductive autonomy. These results provide a benchmark to track the impact of policy changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信