{"title":"烧伤中心对坏死性筋膜炎的管理:结果是否有所不同?","authors":"Joseph A Ward, John A G Gibson, Dai Q Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/2059513120924749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many similarities exist between the care of necrotising fasciitis (NF) and burn injury patients. Each group represents a small but complex cohort requiring multiple theatre trips, specialist reconstruction, meticulous wound care and multidisciplinary management. Over a six-year period, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of NF patients managed within a burns centre against those managed by a plastic surgery service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-note review was performed for all identifiable patients referred to our institution's designated burns centre or plastic surgery service between 2008-2014. Patient characteristics, length of stay, wound-related and clinical outcomes were extracted and descriptively presented with statistical analysis performed for survival and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients were included in the study (burns centre [B]: 17 patients; plastic surgery service [P]: 12 patients). Median total length of stay (B: 37 vs. P: 50 days, <i>P</i>=0.38), local length of stay (27 vs. 19 days, <i>P</i>=0.29) and survival till discharge (94.4% vs. 100%, <i>P</i>=0.73) demonstrated no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Caring for NF patients within a burns centre facilitated easier access to specialist reconstructive expertise and multidisciplinary care but did not lead to statistically significant differences in length of stay or survival. The management of NF within a burns centre facilitated provision of high-quality care to a highly challenging patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/92/10.1177_2059513120924749.PMC7328481.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A Ward, John A G Gibson, Dai Q Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2059513120924749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many similarities exist between the care of necrotising fasciitis (NF) and burn injury patients. Each group represents a small but complex cohort requiring multiple theatre trips, specialist reconstruction, meticulous wound care and multidisciplinary management. Over a six-year period, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of NF patients managed within a burns centre against those managed by a plastic surgery service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-note review was performed for all identifiable patients referred to our institution's designated burns centre or plastic surgery service between 2008-2014. Patient characteristics, length of stay, wound-related and clinical outcomes were extracted and descriptively presented with statistical analysis performed for survival and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients were included in the study (burns centre [B]: 17 patients; plastic surgery service [P]: 12 patients). Median total length of stay (B: 37 vs. P: 50 days, <i>P</i>=0.38), local length of stay (27 vs. 19 days, <i>P</i>=0.29) and survival till discharge (94.4% vs. 100%, <i>P</i>=0.73) demonstrated no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Caring for NF patients within a burns centre facilitated easier access to specialist reconstructive expertise and multidisciplinary care but did not lead to statistically significant differences in length of stay or survival. The management of NF within a burns centre facilitated provision of high-quality care to a highly challenging patient group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/92/10.1177_2059513120924749.PMC7328481.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120924749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120924749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:坏死性筋膜炎(NF)患者的护理与烧伤患者的护理有许多相似之处。每类患者人数不多,但病情复杂,需要多次前往医院、进行专业重建、细致的伤口护理和多学科管理。在六年的时间里,我们试图研究在烧伤中心治疗的 NF 患者与在整形外科服务机构治疗的 NF 患者的临床疗效:我们对 2008-2014 年间转诊至本机构指定烧伤中心或整形外科的所有可识别患者进行了回顾性病例记录审查。对患者特征、住院时间、伤口相关结果和临床结果进行了提取和描述,并对存活率和住院时间进行了统计分析:研究共纳入 29 名患者(烧伤中心[B]:17 名患者;整形外科[P]:12 名患者)。总住院时间中位数(B:37 天 vs. P:50 天,P=0.38)、局部住院时间中位数(27 天 vs. 19 天,P=0.29)和出院存活率中位数(94.4% vs. 100%,P=0.73)在统计学上没有显著差异:结论:在烧伤中心治疗 NF 患者更容易获得专业的重建知识和多学科护理,但在住院时间或存活率方面并没有统计学意义上的显著差异。在烧伤中心对 NF 患者进行管理有助于为这一极具挑战性的患者群体提供高质量的护理服务。
Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?
Introduction: Many similarities exist between the care of necrotising fasciitis (NF) and burn injury patients. Each group represents a small but complex cohort requiring multiple theatre trips, specialist reconstruction, meticulous wound care and multidisciplinary management. Over a six-year period, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of NF patients managed within a burns centre against those managed by a plastic surgery service.
Methods: A retrospective case-note review was performed for all identifiable patients referred to our institution's designated burns centre or plastic surgery service between 2008-2014. Patient characteristics, length of stay, wound-related and clinical outcomes were extracted and descriptively presented with statistical analysis performed for survival and length of stay.
Results: Twenty-nine patients were included in the study (burns centre [B]: 17 patients; plastic surgery service [P]: 12 patients). Median total length of stay (B: 37 vs. P: 50 days, P=0.38), local length of stay (27 vs. 19 days, P=0.29) and survival till discharge (94.4% vs. 100%, P=0.73) demonstrated no statistically significant difference.
Conclusion: Caring for NF patients within a burns centre facilitated easier access to specialist reconstructive expertise and multidisciplinary care but did not lead to statistically significant differences in length of stay or survival. The management of NF within a burns centre facilitated provision of high-quality care to a highly challenging patient group.