补充保健服务保险范围的趋势。

James M Whedon, Serena Bezdjian, Justin M Goehl, Louis A Kazal
{"title":"补充保健服务保险范围的趋势。","authors":"James M Whedon,&nbsp;Serena Bezdjian,&nbsp;Justin M Goehl,&nbsp;Louis A Kazal","doi":"10.1089/acm.2020.0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Complementary health care professionals deliver a substantial component of clinical services in the United States, but insurance coverage for many such services may be inadequate. The objective of this project was to follow up on an earlier single-year study with an evaluation of trends in reimbursement for complementary health care services over a 7-year period. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The authors employed a retrospective serial cross-sectional design to analyze health insurance claims for services provided by licensed acupuncturists, chiropractors, and naturopaths in New Hampshire (NH) from 2011 to 2017. They restricted the analyses to claims in nonemergent outpatient settings for Current Procedural Terminology code 99213, which is one of the most commonly used clinical procedure codes across all specialties. They evaluated by year the likelihood of reimbursement, as compared with primary care physicians as the gold standard. A generalized estimating equation model was used to account for within-person correlations among the separate claim reimbursement indicators for individuals used in the analysis, using an exchangeable working covariance structure among claims for the same individual. Reimbursement was defined as payment >0 dollars. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The total number of clinical services claimed was 26,725 for acupuncture, 8317 for naturopathic medicine, 2,539,144 for chiropractic, and 1,860,271 for primary care. Initially, likelihood of reimbursement for naturopathic physicians was higher relative to primary care physicians, but was lower from 2014 onward. Odds of reimbursement for both acupuncture and chiropractic claims remained lower throughout the study period. In 2017, as compared with primary care the likelihood of reimbursement was 77% lower for acupuncturists, 72% lower for chiropractors, and 64% lower for naturopaths. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The likelihood of reimbursement for complementary health care services is significantly lower than that for primary care physicians in NH. Lack of insurance coverage may result in reduced patient access to such services.</p>","PeriodicalId":520659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":"966-969"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/acm.2020.0078","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Insurance Coverage for Complementary Health Care Services.\",\"authors\":\"James M Whedon,&nbsp;Serena Bezdjian,&nbsp;Justin M Goehl,&nbsp;Louis A Kazal\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/acm.2020.0078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Complementary health care professionals deliver a substantial component of clinical services in the United States, but insurance coverage for many such services may be inadequate. The objective of this project was to follow up on an earlier single-year study with an evaluation of trends in reimbursement for complementary health care services over a 7-year period. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The authors employed a retrospective serial cross-sectional design to analyze health insurance claims for services provided by licensed acupuncturists, chiropractors, and naturopaths in New Hampshire (NH) from 2011 to 2017. They restricted the analyses to claims in nonemergent outpatient settings for Current Procedural Terminology code 99213, which is one of the most commonly used clinical procedure codes across all specialties. They evaluated by year the likelihood of reimbursement, as compared with primary care physicians as the gold standard. A generalized estimating equation model was used to account for within-person correlations among the separate claim reimbursement indicators for individuals used in the analysis, using an exchangeable working covariance structure among claims for the same individual. Reimbursement was defined as payment >0 dollars. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The total number of clinical services claimed was 26,725 for acupuncture, 8317 for naturopathic medicine, 2,539,144 for chiropractic, and 1,860,271 for primary care. Initially, likelihood of reimbursement for naturopathic physicians was higher relative to primary care physicians, but was lower from 2014 onward. Odds of reimbursement for both acupuncture and chiropractic claims remained lower throughout the study period. In 2017, as compared with primary care the likelihood of reimbursement was 77% lower for acupuncturists, 72% lower for chiropractors, and 64% lower for naturopaths. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The likelihood of reimbursement for complementary health care services is significantly lower than that for primary care physicians in NH. Lack of insurance coverage may result in reduced patient access to such services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"966-969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/acm.2020.0078\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

简介:在美国,辅助医疗保健专业人员提供了临床服务的重要组成部分,但许多此类服务的保险覆盖范围可能不足。这一项目的目标是对早先的一项一年期研究采取后续行动,评估7年期间补充保健服务的报销趋势。方法:作者采用回顾性连续横断面设计,分析2011年至2017年新罕布什尔州(NH)持证针灸师、脊医和自然疗法师提供服务的健康保险索赔。他们将分析限制在非急诊门诊设置的当前程序术语代码99213,这是所有专业中最常用的临床程序代码之一。他们按年评估报销的可能性,与初级保健医生作为黄金标准进行比较。使用广义估计方程模型来解释分析中使用的个人单独索赔报销指标之间的个人内部相关性,在同一个人的索赔中使用可交换的工作协方差结构。报销被定义为支付大于0美元。结果:临床服务索赔总数为针灸26,725次,自然疗法8317次,脊椎指压疗法2,539,144次,初级保健1,860,271次。最初,自然疗法医生的报销可能性相对于初级保健医生更高,但从2014年开始降低。在整个研究期间,针灸和脊椎指压疗法索赔的赔偿率仍然较低。2017年,与初级保健相比,针灸师的报销可能性低77%,脊医低72%,自然疗法低64%。结论:补助性卫生保健服务的报销可能性明显低于初级保健医生。缺乏保险可能导致患者获得此类服务的机会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in Insurance Coverage for Complementary Health Care Services.

Introduction: Complementary health care professionals deliver a substantial component of clinical services in the United States, but insurance coverage for many such services may be inadequate. The objective of this project was to follow up on an earlier single-year study with an evaluation of trends in reimbursement for complementary health care services over a 7-year period. Methods: The authors employed a retrospective serial cross-sectional design to analyze health insurance claims for services provided by licensed acupuncturists, chiropractors, and naturopaths in New Hampshire (NH) from 2011 to 2017. They restricted the analyses to claims in nonemergent outpatient settings for Current Procedural Terminology code 99213, which is one of the most commonly used clinical procedure codes across all specialties. They evaluated by year the likelihood of reimbursement, as compared with primary care physicians as the gold standard. A generalized estimating equation model was used to account for within-person correlations among the separate claim reimbursement indicators for individuals used in the analysis, using an exchangeable working covariance structure among claims for the same individual. Reimbursement was defined as payment >0 dollars. Results: The total number of clinical services claimed was 26,725 for acupuncture, 8317 for naturopathic medicine, 2,539,144 for chiropractic, and 1,860,271 for primary care. Initially, likelihood of reimbursement for naturopathic physicians was higher relative to primary care physicians, but was lower from 2014 onward. Odds of reimbursement for both acupuncture and chiropractic claims remained lower throughout the study period. In 2017, as compared with primary care the likelihood of reimbursement was 77% lower for acupuncturists, 72% lower for chiropractors, and 64% lower for naturopaths. Conclusion: The likelihood of reimbursement for complementary health care services is significantly lower than that for primary care physicians in NH. Lack of insurance coverage may result in reduced patient access to such services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信