{"title":"地氟醚、七氟醚和异丙酚在瑞芬太尼全麻中使用声门上气道装置对声门开口面积影响的比较","authors":"Takashi Kondo, Hiromichi Izumi, Makiko Kitagawa","doi":"10.1155/2020/1302898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol on the glottic opening area during general anesthesia using remifentanil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety patients undergoing hand and upper limb surgery combined with brachial plexus block under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into three groups to receive desflurane (group D), sevoflurane (group S), or propofol (group P) for maintenance of anesthesia. Following induction of general anesthesia with remifentanil, continuous fiberoptic video recording around the glottis via an i-gel™ supraglottic device was started after establishing mechanical ventilation. Desflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol was administrated after video recording was started. The changes in normalized glottic opening area (n-GOA) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during surgery were compared between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative changes of n-GOA in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (-0.0656 ± 0.0772 vs. -0.0076 ± 0.0499 and +0.0269 ± 0.0809, <i>P</i>=0.005 and <i>P</i> < 0.0001). The changes of PIP in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (+3.7 ± 3.4 cmH<sub>2</sub>O vs. +1.0 ± 1.3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and -0.3 ± 3.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>P</i>=0.002 and <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Four cases of relapsed glottic stenosis in group D were improved by changing desflurane to propofol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Desflurane narrowed the n-GOA and increased the PIP compared to sevoflurane and propofol during general anesthesia with remifentanil. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of glottic stenosis during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia when the airway is secured by a supraglottic airway device without the use of neuromuscular blockade.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2020 ","pages":"1302898"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/1302898","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device.\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Kondo, Hiromichi Izumi, Makiko Kitagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/1302898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol on the glottic opening area during general anesthesia using remifentanil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety patients undergoing hand and upper limb surgery combined with brachial plexus block under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into three groups to receive desflurane (group D), sevoflurane (group S), or propofol (group P) for maintenance of anesthesia. Following induction of general anesthesia with remifentanil, continuous fiberoptic video recording around the glottis via an i-gel™ supraglottic device was started after establishing mechanical ventilation. Desflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol was administrated after video recording was started. The changes in normalized glottic opening area (n-GOA) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during surgery were compared between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative changes of n-GOA in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (-0.0656 ± 0.0772 vs. -0.0076 ± 0.0499 and +0.0269 ± 0.0809, <i>P</i>=0.005 and <i>P</i> < 0.0001). The changes of PIP in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (+3.7 ± 3.4 cmH<sub>2</sub>O vs. +1.0 ± 1.3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and -0.3 ± 3.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>P</i>=0.002 and <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Four cases of relapsed glottic stenosis in group D were improved by changing desflurane to propofol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Desflurane narrowed the n-GOA and increased the PIP compared to sevoflurane and propofol during general anesthesia with remifentanil. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of glottic stenosis during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia when the airway is secured by a supraglottic airway device without the use of neuromuscular blockade.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"1302898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/1302898\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1302898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1302898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是比较地氟醚、七氟醚和异丙酚对瑞芬太尼全身麻醉时声门开口面积的影响。方法:选取90例全麻下行手上肢手术联合臂丛神经阻滞的患者进行研究。患者随机分为三组,分别接受地氟醚(D组)、七氟醚(S组)和异丙酚(P组)维持麻醉。瑞芬太尼全麻诱导后,在建立机械通气后,通过i-gel™声门上装置开始声门周围的连续光纤视频记录。录像开始后给予地氟醚、七氟醚或异丙酚。比较三组患者手术过程中标准化声门开口面积(n-GOA)和吸气峰值压力(PIP)的变化。结果:D组术中n-GOA变化与S组、P组比较差异有统计学意义(-0.0656±0.0772 vs. -0.0076±0.0499和+0.0269±0.0809,P=0.005和P < 0.0001)。与S组和P组比较,D组PIP变化有显著性差异(+3.7±3.4 cmH2O vs +1.0±1.3 cmH2O和-0.3±3.6 cmH2O, P=0.002和P < 0.0001)。D组4例复发性声门狭窄患者经地氟醚改异丙酚治疗后改善。结论:与七氟醚和异丙酚相比,地氟醚在瑞芬太尼全身麻醉时缩小了n-GOA,增加了PIP。临床医生应注意地氟醚-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间,当气道由声门上气道装置固定而不使用神经肌肉阻滞时,可能出现声门狭窄。
Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol on the glottic opening area during general anesthesia using remifentanil.
Methods: Ninety patients undergoing hand and upper limb surgery combined with brachial plexus block under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into three groups to receive desflurane (group D), sevoflurane (group S), or propofol (group P) for maintenance of anesthesia. Following induction of general anesthesia with remifentanil, continuous fiberoptic video recording around the glottis via an i-gel™ supraglottic device was started after establishing mechanical ventilation. Desflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol was administrated after video recording was started. The changes in normalized glottic opening area (n-GOA) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during surgery were compared between the three groups.
Results: Intraoperative changes of n-GOA in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (-0.0656 ± 0.0772 vs. -0.0076 ± 0.0499 and +0.0269 ± 0.0809, P=0.005 and P < 0.0001). The changes of PIP in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (+3.7 ± 3.4 cmH2O vs. +1.0 ± 1.3 cmH2O and -0.3 ± 3.6 cmH2O, P=0.002 and P < 0.0001). Four cases of relapsed glottic stenosis in group D were improved by changing desflurane to propofol.
Conclusions: Desflurane narrowed the n-GOA and increased the PIP compared to sevoflurane and propofol during general anesthesia with remifentanil. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of glottic stenosis during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia when the airway is secured by a supraglottic airway device without the use of neuromuscular blockade.