医院急诊科严重精神疾病患者寄宿的决定因素

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jangho Yoon, Linh N Bui, Diana J Govier, Megan A Cahn, Jeff Luck
{"title":"医院急诊科严重精神疾病患者寄宿的决定因素","authors":"Jangho Yoon,&nbsp;Linh N Bui,&nbsp;Diana J Govier,&nbsp;Megan A Cahn,&nbsp;Jeff Luck","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Boarding of patients in hospital emergency departments (EDs) occurs routinely across the U.S. ED patients with behavioral health conditions are more likely to be boarded than other patients. However, the existing literature on ED boarding of psychiatric patients remains largely descriptive and has not empirically related mental health system capacity to psychiatric boarding. Nor does it show how the mental health system could better address the needs of populations at the highest risk of ED boarding.</p><p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>We examined extent and determinants of \"boarding\" of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in hospital emergency departments (ED) and tested whether greater mental health system capacity may mitigate the degree of ED boarding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked Oregon's ED Information Exchange, hospital discharge, and Medicaid data to analyze encounters in Oregon hospital EDs from October 2014 through September 2015 by 7,103 persons aged 15 to 64 with SMI (N = 34,207). We additionally utilized Medicaid claims for years 2010-2015 to identify Medicaid beneficiaries with SMI. Boarding was defined as an ED stay over six hours. We estimated a recursive simultaneous-equation model to test the pathway that mental health system capacity affects ED boarding via psychiatric visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychiatric visits were more likely to be boarded than non-psychiatric visits (30.2% vs. 7.4%). Severe psychiatric visits were 1.4 times more likely to be boarded than non-severe psychiatric visits. Thirty-four percent of psychiatric visits by children were boarded compared to 29.6% for adults. Statistical analysis found that psychiatric visit, substance abuse, younger age, black race and urban residence corresponded with an elevated risk of boarding. Discharge destinations such as psychiatric facility and acute care hospitals also corresponded with a higher probability of ED boarding. Greater supply of mental health resources in a county, both inpatient and intensive community-based, corresponded with a reduced risk of ED boarding via fewer psychiatric ED visits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Psychiatric visit, severity of psychiatric diagnosis, substance abuse, and discharge destinations are among important predictors of psychiatric ED boarding by persons with SMI. A greater capacity of inpatient and intensive community mental health systems may lead to a reduction in psychiatric ED visits by persons with SMI and thereby decrease the extent of psychiatric ED boarding.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>Continued investment in mental health system resources may reduce psychiatric ED visits and mitigate the psychiatric ED boarding problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"23 2","pages":"61-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Boarding of Patients with Severe Mental Illness in Hospital Emergency Departments.\",\"authors\":\"Jangho Yoon,&nbsp;Linh N Bui,&nbsp;Diana J Govier,&nbsp;Megan A Cahn,&nbsp;Jeff Luck\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Boarding of patients in hospital emergency departments (EDs) occurs routinely across the U.S. ED patients with behavioral health conditions are more likely to be boarded than other patients. However, the existing literature on ED boarding of psychiatric patients remains largely descriptive and has not empirically related mental health system capacity to psychiatric boarding. Nor does it show how the mental health system could better address the needs of populations at the highest risk of ED boarding.</p><p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>We examined extent and determinants of \\\"boarding\\\" of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in hospital emergency departments (ED) and tested whether greater mental health system capacity may mitigate the degree of ED boarding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked Oregon's ED Information Exchange, hospital discharge, and Medicaid data to analyze encounters in Oregon hospital EDs from October 2014 through September 2015 by 7,103 persons aged 15 to 64 with SMI (N = 34,207). We additionally utilized Medicaid claims for years 2010-2015 to identify Medicaid beneficiaries with SMI. Boarding was defined as an ED stay over six hours. We estimated a recursive simultaneous-equation model to test the pathway that mental health system capacity affects ED boarding via psychiatric visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychiatric visits were more likely to be boarded than non-psychiatric visits (30.2% vs. 7.4%). Severe psychiatric visits were 1.4 times more likely to be boarded than non-severe psychiatric visits. Thirty-four percent of psychiatric visits by children were boarded compared to 29.6% for adults. Statistical analysis found that psychiatric visit, substance abuse, younger age, black race and urban residence corresponded with an elevated risk of boarding. Discharge destinations such as psychiatric facility and acute care hospitals also corresponded with a higher probability of ED boarding. Greater supply of mental health resources in a county, both inpatient and intensive community-based, corresponded with a reduced risk of ED boarding via fewer psychiatric ED visits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Psychiatric visit, severity of psychiatric diagnosis, substance abuse, and discharge destinations are among important predictors of psychiatric ED boarding by persons with SMI. A greater capacity of inpatient and intensive community mental health systems may lead to a reduction in psychiatric ED visits by persons with SMI and thereby decrease the extent of psychiatric ED boarding.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>Continued investment in mental health system resources may reduce psychiatric ED visits and mitigate the psychiatric ED boarding problem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"61-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,医院急诊科(ED)患者入住的情况经常发生,有行为健康问题的ED患者比其他患者更有可能入住。然而,现有的关于精神病患者急诊科入住的文献大多是描述性的,并没有将精神卫生系统的能力与精神科入住联系起来。它也没有显示出心理健康系统如何更好地解决急诊科登机风险最高的人群的需求。研究目的:我们研究了严重精神疾病(SMI)患者在医院急诊科(ED)“登机”的程度和决定因素,并测试了更大的精神卫生系统容量是否可以减轻ED登机的程度。方法:我们将俄勒冈州的急诊科信息交换、出院和医疗补助数据联系起来,分析2014年10月至2015年9月在俄勒冈州医院急诊科就诊的7103名15至64岁的重度精神分裂症患者(N = 34,207)。我们还利用2010-2015年的医疗补助申请来确定患有重度精神障碍的医疗补助受益人。登机被定义为在急诊室停留超过六小时。我们估计了一个递归的联立方程模型来检验精神卫生系统容量通过精神科就诊影响ED登机的途径。结果:精神科就诊比非精神科就诊更有可能被登机(30.2% vs. 7.4%)。严重的精神科就诊比非严重的精神科就诊有1.4倍的可能性被拘留。34%的儿童接受心理治疗,而成人则为29.6%。统计分析发现,精神科就诊、药物滥用、年龄更小、黑人种族和城市居住与登机风险增加有关。出院目的地,如精神病院和急症护理医院,也与急诊科登机的可能性较高相对应。在一个县,更多的精神卫生资源供应,无论是住院病人还是密集的社区,都与较少的精神科急诊科就诊减少了急诊科入住的风险相对应。讨论:精神科就诊、精神科诊断严重程度、药物滥用和出院目的地是重度精神障碍患者入住精神科急诊科的重要预测因素。住院病人和强化社区精神卫生系统的更大容量可能导致重度精神障碍患者到精神科急诊科就诊的减少,从而减少精神科急诊科入住的程度。对卫生政策的影响:对精神卫生系统资源的持续投资可能会减少精神科急诊科的就诊,并缓解精神科急诊科的寄宿问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determinants of Boarding of Patients with Severe Mental Illness in Hospital Emergency Departments.

Background: Boarding of patients in hospital emergency departments (EDs) occurs routinely across the U.S. ED patients with behavioral health conditions are more likely to be boarded than other patients. However, the existing literature on ED boarding of psychiatric patients remains largely descriptive and has not empirically related mental health system capacity to psychiatric boarding. Nor does it show how the mental health system could better address the needs of populations at the highest risk of ED boarding.

Aims of the study: We examined extent and determinants of "boarding" of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in hospital emergency departments (ED) and tested whether greater mental health system capacity may mitigate the degree of ED boarding.

Methods: We linked Oregon's ED Information Exchange, hospital discharge, and Medicaid data to analyze encounters in Oregon hospital EDs from October 2014 through September 2015 by 7,103 persons aged 15 to 64 with SMI (N = 34,207). We additionally utilized Medicaid claims for years 2010-2015 to identify Medicaid beneficiaries with SMI. Boarding was defined as an ED stay over six hours. We estimated a recursive simultaneous-equation model to test the pathway that mental health system capacity affects ED boarding via psychiatric visits.

Results: Psychiatric visits were more likely to be boarded than non-psychiatric visits (30.2% vs. 7.4%). Severe psychiatric visits were 1.4 times more likely to be boarded than non-severe psychiatric visits. Thirty-four percent of psychiatric visits by children were boarded compared to 29.6% for adults. Statistical analysis found that psychiatric visit, substance abuse, younger age, black race and urban residence corresponded with an elevated risk of boarding. Discharge destinations such as psychiatric facility and acute care hospitals also corresponded with a higher probability of ED boarding. Greater supply of mental health resources in a county, both inpatient and intensive community-based, corresponded with a reduced risk of ED boarding via fewer psychiatric ED visits.

Discussion: Psychiatric visit, severity of psychiatric diagnosis, substance abuse, and discharge destinations are among important predictors of psychiatric ED boarding by persons with SMI. A greater capacity of inpatient and intensive community mental health systems may lead to a reduction in psychiatric ED visits by persons with SMI and thereby decrease the extent of psychiatric ED boarding.

Implications for health policies: Continued investment in mental health system resources may reduce psychiatric ED visits and mitigate the psychiatric ED boarding problem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信