挪威语版老年活动能力量表在老年住院患者中的信度和效度。

Inger Dokken, Therese Brovold, Karin Hesseberg
{"title":"挪威语版老年活动能力量表在老年住院患者中的信度和效度。","authors":"Inger Dokken,&nbsp;Therese Brovold,&nbsp;Karin Hesseberg","doi":"10.1002/pri.1857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Reliable and valid assessment tools are needed to evaluate and predict physical function in older hospitalised patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Norwegian-language version of the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS-N) for use with geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients admitted to a medical ward in a hospital in Norway were included. The inclusion criteria were acute hospital admission because of medical issues, age ≥65 years and referred to a physiotherapist for a physical function review. The original version of the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) was translated from English to Norwegian before initiating this study. EMS-N was tested for internal consistency, test-retest reliability and criterion validity by using the short physical performance battery (SPPB) as the gold standard. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was estimated by linear weighted kappa and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 82 (range 65-95). The main admission diagnoses were acute functional decline (64%, n = 32) or acute infection (26%, n = 13). Internal consistency was estimated at 0.88. Test-retest reliability: six of the seven EMS-N items showed very good consistency, and the last item showed good consistency, ICC was estimated at 0.99. The standard error of measurement (SEM) reflected the absolute reliability, calculated at 0.52. The minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated with 95 and 90% confidence intervals at 1.44 and 1.21, respectively. Criterion validity was calculated by a correlation analysis of the EMS-N and the SPPB. The rho value was estimated as 0.75, which corresponds to a high correlation and indicated good criterion validity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>EMS-N exhibited good internal consistency and good to very good test-retest reliability and criterion validity. EMS can safely be used as an assessment tool for hospitalised geriatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":519522,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","volume":" ","pages":"e1857"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pri.1857","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the Norwegian-language version of the elderly mobility scale in older hospitalised patients.\",\"authors\":\"Inger Dokken,&nbsp;Therese Brovold,&nbsp;Karin Hesseberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.1857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Reliable and valid assessment tools are needed to evaluate and predict physical function in older hospitalised patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Norwegian-language version of the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS-N) for use with geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients admitted to a medical ward in a hospital in Norway were included. The inclusion criteria were acute hospital admission because of medical issues, age ≥65 years and referred to a physiotherapist for a physical function review. The original version of the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) was translated from English to Norwegian before initiating this study. EMS-N was tested for internal consistency, test-retest reliability and criterion validity by using the short physical performance battery (SPPB) as the gold standard. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was estimated by linear weighted kappa and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 82 (range 65-95). The main admission diagnoses were acute functional decline (64%, n = 32) or acute infection (26%, n = 13). Internal consistency was estimated at 0.88. Test-retest reliability: six of the seven EMS-N items showed very good consistency, and the last item showed good consistency, ICC was estimated at 0.99. The standard error of measurement (SEM) reflected the absolute reliability, calculated at 0.52. The minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated with 95 and 90% confidence intervals at 1.44 and 1.21, respectively. Criterion validity was calculated by a correlation analysis of the EMS-N and the SPPB. The rho value was estimated as 0.75, which corresponds to a high correlation and indicated good criterion validity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>EMS-N exhibited good internal consistency and good to very good test-retest reliability and criterion validity. EMS can safely be used as an assessment tool for hospitalised geriatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1857\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pri.1857\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景与目的:需要可靠有效的评估工具来评估和预测老年住院患者的身体功能。本研究的目的是确定挪威语版老年活动能力量表(EMS-N)用于老年患者的信度和效度。方法:选取挪威某医院某病房收治的50例患者为研究对象。纳入标准是因医疗问题急性住院,年龄≥65岁,并转介物理治疗师进行身体功能检查。在本研究开始之前,老年人行动能力量表(EMS)的原始版本已从英语翻译成挪威语。以短物理性能电池(SPPB)为金标准,对EMS-N进行内部一致性、重测信度和效度测试。内部一致性采用Cronbach’s alpha测量。用线性加权kappa和类内相关系数(ICC)估计重测信度。结果:参与者的平均年龄为82岁(65-95岁)。入院诊断主要为急性功能减退(64%,n = 32)或急性感染(26%,n = 13)。内部一致性估计为0.88。重测信度:7个EMS-N条目中有6个条目具有很好的一致性,最后一个条目具有很好的一致性,ICC估计为0.99。测量标准误差(SEM)反映绝对信度,计算值为0.52。最小可检测变化(MDC)分别以95%和90%的置信区间为1.44和1.21计算。通过对EMS-N和SPPB的相关分析计算标准效度。rho值估计为0.75,对应于高相关性,表明标准效度良好。讨论:EMS-N具有良好的内部一致性和良好到非常好的重测信度和效度。EMS可以安全地用作住院老年患者的评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity of the Norwegian-language version of the elderly mobility scale in older hospitalised patients.

Background and purpose: Reliable and valid assessment tools are needed to evaluate and predict physical function in older hospitalised patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Norwegian-language version of the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS-N) for use with geriatric patients.

Methods: Fifty patients admitted to a medical ward in a hospital in Norway were included. The inclusion criteria were acute hospital admission because of medical issues, age ≥65 years and referred to a physiotherapist for a physical function review. The original version of the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) was translated from English to Norwegian before initiating this study. EMS-N was tested for internal consistency, test-retest reliability and criterion validity by using the short physical performance battery (SPPB) as the gold standard. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was estimated by linear weighted kappa and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The mean age of participants was 82 (range 65-95). The main admission diagnoses were acute functional decline (64%, n = 32) or acute infection (26%, n = 13). Internal consistency was estimated at 0.88. Test-retest reliability: six of the seven EMS-N items showed very good consistency, and the last item showed good consistency, ICC was estimated at 0.99. The standard error of measurement (SEM) reflected the absolute reliability, calculated at 0.52. The minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated with 95 and 90% confidence intervals at 1.44 and 1.21, respectively. Criterion validity was calculated by a correlation analysis of the EMS-N and the SPPB. The rho value was estimated as 0.75, which corresponds to a high correlation and indicated good criterion validity.

Discussion: EMS-N exhibited good internal consistency and good to very good test-retest reliability and criterion validity. EMS can safely be used as an assessment tool for hospitalised geriatric patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信