对疼痛的学术兴趣:四个长期从事疼痛医学的专业的比较

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Darin J. Correll, Igor Kissin
{"title":"对疼痛的学术兴趣:四个长期从事疼痛医学的专业的比较","authors":"Darin J. Correll,&nbsp;Igor Kissin","doi":"10.1016/j.janh.2019.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>One of the most interesting signs of growth in a medical specialty is the addition of pain medicine as a clinical subspecialty to it. The aim of this study was to analyze publication-based academic interest in pain medicine among clinical specialties with long-standing involvement in pain management.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We assessed the activity within several specialties in the development of an academic foundation for pain medicine by measuring the frequency of the most common pain topics (1998-2017) in academic journals representing such specialties. The selection of materials for the analysis of publication-based academic interest associated with the development of pain medicine followed a three-step process: (1) Medical specialties, limited to those with accredited fellowship training in pain medicine for more than 20 years – anesthesiology<span>, neurology<span>, physiatry, and psychiatry; (2) Pain topics, based on the degree of topic association with the work of pain clinics – a total of 34 topics; (3) Specialty journals, mostly official journals of societies publishing articles representing all aspects of a specialty – four journals per specialty. Specialty-related academic interest was characterized in two dimensions: its breadth (the number of different topics of interest with distinctly high shares of publications) and its intensity (maximal number of publications on a particular topic).</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>According to the number of topics with a distinctly high share of articles per topic (≥ 5%), the rank order of specialties was as follows (of 34 topics): anesthesiology (22), physiatry (20), neurology (10), and psychiatry (0). Regarding comparative intensity of interest, anesthesiology has prevailing interest in 16 topics (especially in postoperative pain and pharmacologic pain treatment), physiatry in 13 topics (especially in physical methods of pain therapy), and neurology in one topic (headache disorders).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Publication-based academic interest in pain management was most intensive in two specialties, anesthesiology and physiatry, with anesthesiology being somewhat more multifaceted, especially in the methods of pain treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia History","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 84-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.janh.2019.08.003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Interest in Pain: Comparison of Four Specialties With Long-Standing Involvement in Pain Medicine\",\"authors\":\"Darin J. Correll,&nbsp;Igor Kissin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janh.2019.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>One of the most interesting signs of growth in a medical specialty is the addition of pain medicine as a clinical subspecialty to it. The aim of this study was to analyze publication-based academic interest in pain medicine among clinical specialties with long-standing involvement in pain management.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We assessed the activity within several specialties in the development of an academic foundation for pain medicine by measuring the frequency of the most common pain topics (1998-2017) in academic journals representing such specialties. The selection of materials for the analysis of publication-based academic interest associated with the development of pain medicine followed a three-step process: (1) Medical specialties, limited to those with accredited fellowship training in pain medicine for more than 20 years – anesthesiology<span>, neurology<span>, physiatry, and psychiatry; (2) Pain topics, based on the degree of topic association with the work of pain clinics – a total of 34 topics; (3) Specialty journals, mostly official journals of societies publishing articles representing all aspects of a specialty – four journals per specialty. Specialty-related academic interest was characterized in two dimensions: its breadth (the number of different topics of interest with distinctly high shares of publications) and its intensity (maximal number of publications on a particular topic).</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>According to the number of topics with a distinctly high share of articles per topic (≥ 5%), the rank order of specialties was as follows (of 34 topics): anesthesiology (22), physiatry (20), neurology (10), and psychiatry (0). Regarding comparative intensity of interest, anesthesiology has prevailing interest in 16 topics (especially in postoperative pain and pharmacologic pain treatment), physiatry in 13 topics (especially in physical methods of pain therapy), and neurology in one topic (headache disorders).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Publication-based academic interest in pain management was most intensive in two specialties, anesthesiology and physiatry, with anesthesiology being somewhat more multifaceted, especially in the methods of pain treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia History\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 84-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.janh.2019.08.003\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352452919300635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352452919300635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的医学专业发展的最有趣的迹象之一是增加了疼痛医学作为临床亚专业。本研究的目的是分析长期参与疼痛管理的临床专业对疼痛医学的学术兴趣。方法:我们通过测量代表这些专业的学术期刊上最常见的疼痛主题(1998-2017)的频率,评估了几个专业在建立疼痛医学学术基础方面的活动。分析与疼痛医学发展相关的以出版物为基础的学术兴趣的材料选择遵循三个步骤:(1)医学专业,仅限于那些在疼痛医学方面接受过超过20年认可的奖学金培训的人-麻醉学,神经学,物理学和精神病学;(2)疼痛主题,根据主题与疼痛诊所工作的关联程度,共34个主题;(3)专业期刊,主要是学会的官方期刊,发表代表一个专业各个方面的文章——每个专业四份期刊。与专业相关的学术兴趣在两个维度上表现出来:广度(不同主题的兴趣数量和出版物的明显高份额)和强度(特定主题的最大出版物数量)。结果根据每个主题文章占比明显高(≥5%)的主题数,各专业(34个主题)的排名顺序如下:麻醉学(22),物理学(20),神经学(10)和精神病学(0)。在兴趣的比较强度方面,麻醉学在16个主题(特别是在术后疼痛和药物疼痛治疗方面),物理学在13个主题(特别是在疼痛治疗的物理方法方面),神经学在一个主题(头痛疾病)。结论以出版物为基础的对疼痛管理的学术兴趣主要集中在麻醉学和物理学两个专业,而麻醉学在某种程度上更具多面性,特别是在疼痛治疗方法方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Academic Interest in Pain: Comparison of Four Specialties With Long-Standing Involvement in Pain Medicine

Purpose

One of the most interesting signs of growth in a medical specialty is the addition of pain medicine as a clinical subspecialty to it. The aim of this study was to analyze publication-based academic interest in pain medicine among clinical specialties with long-standing involvement in pain management.

Methods

We assessed the activity within several specialties in the development of an academic foundation for pain medicine by measuring the frequency of the most common pain topics (1998-2017) in academic journals representing such specialties. The selection of materials for the analysis of publication-based academic interest associated with the development of pain medicine followed a three-step process: (1) Medical specialties, limited to those with accredited fellowship training in pain medicine for more than 20 years – anesthesiology, neurology, physiatry, and psychiatry; (2) Pain topics, based on the degree of topic association with the work of pain clinics – a total of 34 topics; (3) Specialty journals, mostly official journals of societies publishing articles representing all aspects of a specialty – four journals per specialty. Specialty-related academic interest was characterized in two dimensions: its breadth (the number of different topics of interest with distinctly high shares of publications) and its intensity (maximal number of publications on a particular topic).

Results

According to the number of topics with a distinctly high share of articles per topic (≥ 5%), the rank order of specialties was as follows (of 34 topics): anesthesiology (22), physiatry (20), neurology (10), and psychiatry (0). Regarding comparative intensity of interest, anesthesiology has prevailing interest in 16 topics (especially in postoperative pain and pharmacologic pain treatment), physiatry in 13 topics (especially in physical methods of pain therapy), and neurology in one topic (headache disorders).

Conclusion

Publication-based academic interest in pain management was most intensive in two specialties, anesthesiology and physiatry, with anesthesiology being somewhat more multifaceted, especially in the methods of pain treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia History
Journal of Anesthesia History Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia History (ISSN 2352-4529) is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the study of anesthesia history and related disciplines. The Journal addresses anesthesia history from antiquity to the present. Its wide scope includes the history of perioperative care, pain medicine, critical care medicine, physician and nurse practices of anesthesia, equipment, drugs, and prominent individuals. The Journal serves a diverse audience of physicians, nurses, dentists, clinicians, historians, educators, researchers and academicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信