Carlina Deflorin, Erich Hohenauer, Rahel Stoop, Ulrike van Daele, Ron Clijsen, Jan Taeymans
{"title":"疤痕组织的物理管理:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Carlina Deflorin, Erich Hohenauer, Rahel Stoop, Ulrike van Daele, Ron Clijsen, Jan Taeymans","doi":"10.1089/acm.2020.0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Systematic review and meta-analysis. <b><i>Subjects:</i></b> Adults with any kind of scar tissue. <b><i>Interventions:</i></b> Physical scar management versus control or no scar management. <b><i>Outcome measures:</i></b> Pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, surface area, scar thickness. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The overall results revealed that physical scar management is beneficial compared with the control treatment regarding the management of pain (<i>p</i> = 0.012), pruritus (<i>p</i> < 0.001), pigmentation (<i>p</i> = 0.010), pliability (<i>p</i> < 0.001), surface area (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and thickness (<i>p</i> = 0.022) of scar tissue in adults. The observed risk of bias was high for blinding of participants and personnel (47%) and low for other bias (100%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Physical scar management demonstrates moderate-to-strong effects on improvement of scar issues as related to signs and symptoms. These results show the importance of specific physical management of scar tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":520659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":"854-865"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/acm.2020.0109","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Carlina Deflorin, Erich Hohenauer, Rahel Stoop, Ulrike van Daele, Ron Clijsen, Jan Taeymans\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/acm.2020.0109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Systematic review and meta-analysis. <b><i>Subjects:</i></b> Adults with any kind of scar tissue. <b><i>Interventions:</i></b> Physical scar management versus control or no scar management. <b><i>Outcome measures:</i></b> Pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, surface area, scar thickness. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The overall results revealed that physical scar management is beneficial compared with the control treatment regarding the management of pain (<i>p</i> = 0.012), pruritus (<i>p</i> < 0.001), pigmentation (<i>p</i> = 0.010), pliability (<i>p</i> < 0.001), surface area (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and thickness (<i>p</i> = 0.022) of scar tissue in adults. The observed risk of bias was high for blinding of participants and personnel (47%) and low for other bias (100%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Physical scar management demonstrates moderate-to-strong effects on improvement of scar issues as related to signs and symptoms. These results show the importance of specific physical management of scar tissue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"854-865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/acm.2020.0109\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Objective: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Subjects: Adults with any kind of scar tissue. Interventions: Physical scar management versus control or no scar management. Outcome measures: Pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, surface area, scar thickness. Results: The overall results revealed that physical scar management is beneficial compared with the control treatment regarding the management of pain (p = 0.012), pruritus (p < 0.001), pigmentation (p = 0.010), pliability (p < 0.001), surface area (p < 0.001), and thickness (p = 0.022) of scar tissue in adults. The observed risk of bias was high for blinding of participants and personnel (47%) and low for other bias (100%). Conclusions: Physical scar management demonstrates moderate-to-strong effects on improvement of scar issues as related to signs and symptoms. These results show the importance of specific physical management of scar tissue.