讨厌打破你的气球:成功的REBOA使用需要更多的课程。

IF 0.4 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Christina M Theodorou, Edgardo S Salcedo, Joseph J DuBose, Joseph M Galante
{"title":"讨厌打破你的气球:成功的REBOA使用需要更多的课程。","authors":"Christina M Theodorou,&nbsp;Edgardo S Salcedo,&nbsp;Joseph J DuBose,&nbsp;Joseph M Galante","doi":"10.26676/jevtm.v4i1.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is emerging as a viable intervention for hemorrhagic shock. Training surgeons to place the device is only part of the process. We hypothesize that implementation challenges extend beyond surgical skills training and initial REBOA use should not be expected to mirror published success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All REBOA placements from January 2016 to February 2017 at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed for opportunities for improvement. From September 2016 to February 2017, all patients meeting highest trauma activation criteria were reviewed against our REBOA algorithm to identify patients meeting criteria for REBOA placement but not undergoing the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>REBOA was introduced at our institution in September 2015, with the first placement in January 2016. Trauma surgery, emergency department, and operating room staff underwent training. Nine patients had REBOA placed with six survivors. One patient underwent an unsuccessful REBOA attempt and died. Four patients had complications from REBOA. Eight additional patients met indications but did not undergo REBOA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful REBOA use requires more than teaching surgeons indications and techniques. For a successful REBOA program, system factors must be addressed. System processes must ensure equipment and procedures are standardized and familiar to all involved. Complications should be expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":41233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","volume":"4 1","pages":"21-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316347/pdf/nihms-1599485.pdf","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hate to Burst Your Balloon: Successful REBOA Use Takes More Than a Course.\",\"authors\":\"Christina M Theodorou,&nbsp;Edgardo S Salcedo,&nbsp;Joseph J DuBose,&nbsp;Joseph M Galante\",\"doi\":\"10.26676/jevtm.v4i1.106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is emerging as a viable intervention for hemorrhagic shock. Training surgeons to place the device is only part of the process. We hypothesize that implementation challenges extend beyond surgical skills training and initial REBOA use should not be expected to mirror published success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All REBOA placements from January 2016 to February 2017 at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed for opportunities for improvement. From September 2016 to February 2017, all patients meeting highest trauma activation criteria were reviewed against our REBOA algorithm to identify patients meeting criteria for REBOA placement but not undergoing the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>REBOA was introduced at our institution in September 2015, with the first placement in January 2016. Trauma surgery, emergency department, and operating room staff underwent training. Nine patients had REBOA placed with six survivors. One patient underwent an unsuccessful REBOA attempt and died. Four patients had complications from REBOA. Eight additional patients met indications but did not undergo REBOA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful REBOA use requires more than teaching surgeons indications and techniques. For a successful REBOA program, system factors must be addressed. System processes must ensure equipment and procedures are standardized and familiar to all involved. Complications should be expected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"21-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7316347/pdf/nihms-1599485.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.v4i1.106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.v4i1.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:复苏血管内球囊阻塞主动脉(REBOA)正在成为一种可行的干预失血性休克。培训外科医生放置设备只是整个过程的一部分。我们假设,实施的挑战超出了手术技能培训,最初的REBOA使用不应期望反映已发表的成功。方法:回顾2016年1月至2017年2月在一级创伤中心的所有REBOA安置情况,寻找改进的机会。从2016年9月到2017年2月,所有符合最高创伤激活标准的患者都根据我们的REBOA算法进行了审查,以确定符合REBOA放置标准但未接受手术的患者。结果:REBOA于2015年9月引入我院,2016年1月首次安置。创伤外科、急诊科和手术室的工作人员接受了培训。9名患者与6名幸存者一起接受了REBOA。一名患者接受REBOA尝试失败并死亡。4例患者出现REBOA并发症。另有8例患者符合适应症,但未接受REBOA。结论:REBOA的成功应用需要的不仅仅是教给外科医生指征和技术。对于一个成功的REBOA项目,必须解决系统因素。系统流程必须确保设备和程序是标准化的,并为所有相关人员所熟悉。并发症是预料之中的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hate to Burst Your Balloon: Successful REBOA Use Takes More Than a Course.

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is emerging as a viable intervention for hemorrhagic shock. Training surgeons to place the device is only part of the process. We hypothesize that implementation challenges extend beyond surgical skills training and initial REBOA use should not be expected to mirror published success.

Methods: All REBOA placements from January 2016 to February 2017 at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed for opportunities for improvement. From September 2016 to February 2017, all patients meeting highest trauma activation criteria were reviewed against our REBOA algorithm to identify patients meeting criteria for REBOA placement but not undergoing the procedure.

Results: REBOA was introduced at our institution in September 2015, with the first placement in January 2016. Trauma surgery, emergency department, and operating room staff underwent training. Nine patients had REBOA placed with six survivors. One patient underwent an unsuccessful REBOA attempt and died. Four patients had complications from REBOA. Eight additional patients met indications but did not undergo REBOA.

Conclusions: Successful REBOA use requires more than teaching surgeons indications and techniques. For a successful REBOA program, system factors must be addressed. System processes must ensure equipment and procedures are standardized and familiar to all involved. Complications should be expected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信