蝌蚪挑战:通过众包预测未来数据来准确预测阿尔茨海默病。

Răzvan V Marinescu, Neil P Oxtoby, Alexandra L Young, Esther E Bron, Arthur W Toga, Michael W Weiner, Frederik Barkhof, Nick C Fox, Polina Golland, Stefan Klein, Daniel C Alexander
{"title":"蝌蚪挑战:通过众包预测未来数据来准确预测阿尔茨海默病。","authors":"Răzvan V Marinescu,&nbsp;Neil P Oxtoby,&nbsp;Alexandra L Young,&nbsp;Esther E Bron,&nbsp;Arthur W Toga,&nbsp;Michael W Weiner,&nbsp;Frederik Barkhof,&nbsp;Nick C Fox,&nbsp;Polina Golland,&nbsp;Stefan Klein,&nbsp;Daniel C Alexander","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-32281-6_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution (TADPOLE) Challenge compares the performance of algorithms at predicting the future evolution of individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease. TADPOLE Challenge participants train their models and algorithms on historical data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study. Participants are then required to make forecasts of three key outcomes for ADNI-3 rollover participants: clinical diagnosis, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subdomain (ADAS-Cog 13), and total volume of the ventricles - which are then compared with future measurements. Strong points of the challenge are that the test data did not exist at the time of forecasting (it was acquired afterwards), and that it focuses on the challenging problem of cohort selection for clinical trials by identifying fast progressors. The submission phase of TADPOLE was open until 15 November 2017; since then data has been acquired until April 2019 from 219 subjects with 223 clinical visits and 150 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, which was used for the evaluation of the participants' predictions. Thirty-three teams participated with a total of 92 submissions. No single submission was best at predicting all three outcomes. For diagnosis prediction, the best forecast (team Frog), which was based on gradient boosting, obtained a multiclass area under the receiver-operating curve (MAUC) of 0.931, while for ventricle prediction the best forecast (team <i>EMC1</i> ), which was based on disease progression modelling and spline regression, obtained mean absolute error of 0.41% of total intracranial volume (ICV). For ADAS-Cog 13, no forecast was considerably better than the benchmark mixed effects model (<i>BenchmarkME</i> ), provided to participants before the submission deadline. Further analysis can help understand which input features and algorithms are most suitable for Alzheimer's disease prediction and for aiding patient stratification in clinical trials. The submission system remains open via the website: https://tadpole.grand-challenge.org/.</p>","PeriodicalId":92572,"journal":{"name":"PRedictive Intelligence in MEdicine. PRIME (Workshop)","volume":"11843 ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315046/pdf/nihms-1586281.pdf","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TADPOLE Challenge: Accurate Alzheimer's disease prediction through crowdsourced forecasting of future data.\",\"authors\":\"Răzvan V Marinescu,&nbsp;Neil P Oxtoby,&nbsp;Alexandra L Young,&nbsp;Esther E Bron,&nbsp;Arthur W Toga,&nbsp;Michael W Weiner,&nbsp;Frederik Barkhof,&nbsp;Nick C Fox,&nbsp;Polina Golland,&nbsp;Stefan Klein,&nbsp;Daniel C Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/978-3-030-32281-6_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution (TADPOLE) Challenge compares the performance of algorithms at predicting the future evolution of individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease. TADPOLE Challenge participants train their models and algorithms on historical data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study. Participants are then required to make forecasts of three key outcomes for ADNI-3 rollover participants: clinical diagnosis, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subdomain (ADAS-Cog 13), and total volume of the ventricles - which are then compared with future measurements. Strong points of the challenge are that the test data did not exist at the time of forecasting (it was acquired afterwards), and that it focuses on the challenging problem of cohort selection for clinical trials by identifying fast progressors. The submission phase of TADPOLE was open until 15 November 2017; since then data has been acquired until April 2019 from 219 subjects with 223 clinical visits and 150 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, which was used for the evaluation of the participants' predictions. Thirty-three teams participated with a total of 92 submissions. No single submission was best at predicting all three outcomes. For diagnosis prediction, the best forecast (team Frog), which was based on gradient boosting, obtained a multiclass area under the receiver-operating curve (MAUC) of 0.931, while for ventricle prediction the best forecast (team <i>EMC1</i> ), which was based on disease progression modelling and spline regression, obtained mean absolute error of 0.41% of total intracranial volume (ICV). For ADAS-Cog 13, no forecast was considerably better than the benchmark mixed effects model (<i>BenchmarkME</i> ), provided to participants before the submission deadline. Further analysis can help understand which input features and algorithms are most suitable for Alzheimer's disease prediction and for aiding patient stratification in clinical trials. The submission system remains open via the website: https://tadpole.grand-challenge.org/.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRedictive Intelligence in MEdicine. PRIME (Workshop)\",\"volume\":\"11843 \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315046/pdf/nihms-1586281.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRedictive Intelligence in MEdicine. PRIME (Workshop)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32281-6_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRedictive Intelligence in MEdicine. PRIME (Workshop)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32281-6_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

阿尔茨海默病纵向进化预测(蝌蚪)挑战比较了算法在预测阿尔茨海默病风险个体未来进化方面的表现。蝌蚪挑战的参与者根据阿尔茨海默病神经成像倡议(ADNI)研究的历史数据训练他们的模型和算法。然后,参与者被要求对ADNI-3翻转参与者的三个关键结果做出预测:临床诊断、阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知子域(ADAS-Cog 13)和心室的总体积,然后将其与未来的测量结果进行比较。挑战的优点是,在预测时不存在测试数据(它是后来获得的),并且它通过识别快速进展者来关注临床试验队列选择的挑战性问题。蝌蚪的提交阶段开放至2017年11月15日;从那时起,到2019年4月,219名受试者进行了223次临床就诊和150次磁共振成像(MRI)扫描,这些数据被用于评估参与者的预测。三十三支参赛队伍共提交了92份参赛作品。没有哪一份报告能最好地预测所有三种结果。对于诊断预测,基于梯度增强的最佳预测(Frog组)获得了接收者-操作曲线下的多类面积(MAUC)为0.931,而对于脑室预测,基于疾病进展建模和样条回归的最佳预测(EMC1组)获得了总颅内容积(ICV)的平均绝对误差为0.41%。对于ADAS-Cog 13,在提交截止日期之前提供给参与者的基准混合效果模型(BenchmarkME)没有任何预测明显好于基准混合效果模型。进一步的分析可以帮助了解哪些输入特征和算法最适合用于阿尔茨海默病的预测,并有助于临床试验中的患者分层。提交系统仍然通过网站https://tadpole.grand-challenge.org/开放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TADPOLE Challenge: Accurate Alzheimer's disease prediction through crowdsourced forecasting of future data.

The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution (TADPOLE) Challenge compares the performance of algorithms at predicting the future evolution of individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease. TADPOLE Challenge participants train their models and algorithms on historical data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study. Participants are then required to make forecasts of three key outcomes for ADNI-3 rollover participants: clinical diagnosis, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subdomain (ADAS-Cog 13), and total volume of the ventricles - which are then compared with future measurements. Strong points of the challenge are that the test data did not exist at the time of forecasting (it was acquired afterwards), and that it focuses on the challenging problem of cohort selection for clinical trials by identifying fast progressors. The submission phase of TADPOLE was open until 15 November 2017; since then data has been acquired until April 2019 from 219 subjects with 223 clinical visits and 150 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, which was used for the evaluation of the participants' predictions. Thirty-three teams participated with a total of 92 submissions. No single submission was best at predicting all three outcomes. For diagnosis prediction, the best forecast (team Frog), which was based on gradient boosting, obtained a multiclass area under the receiver-operating curve (MAUC) of 0.931, while for ventricle prediction the best forecast (team EMC1 ), which was based on disease progression modelling and spline regression, obtained mean absolute error of 0.41% of total intracranial volume (ICV). For ADAS-Cog 13, no forecast was considerably better than the benchmark mixed effects model (BenchmarkME ), provided to participants before the submission deadline. Further analysis can help understand which input features and algorithms are most suitable for Alzheimer's disease prediction and for aiding patient stratification in clinical trials. The submission system remains open via the website: https://tadpole.grand-challenge.org/.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信