视网膜母细胞瘤幸存者的植入前遗传学诊断:一项成本-效果研究

Q1 Social Sciences
D. Schofield , M.J.B. Zeppel , S. Staffieri , R.N. Shrestha , D. Jelovic , E. Lee , R.V. Jamieson
{"title":"视网膜母细胞瘤幸存者的植入前遗传学诊断:一项成本-效果研究","authors":"D. Schofield ,&nbsp;M.J.B. Zeppel ,&nbsp;S. Staffieri ,&nbsp;R.N. Shrestha ,&nbsp;D. Jelovic ,&nbsp;E. Lee ,&nbsp;R.V. Jamieson","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the reproductive choices of patients with heritable retinoblastoma. The study modelled the costs of three cycles of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and PGD across all uptake rates of PGD, number of children affected with retinoblastoma at each uptake rate and the estimated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the Australian public healthcare perspective. The intervention was the use of three cycles (one fresh and two frozen) of IVF and PGD with the aim of live births unaffected by the retinoblastoma phenotype. Compared with the standard care pathway (i.e. natural pregnancy), IVF and PGD resulted in a cost-saving to 18 years of age of AUD$2,747,294 for a base case of 100 couples with an uptake rate of 50%. IVF and PGD resulted in fewer affected (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->56) and unaffected (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->78) live births compared with standard care (71 affected and 83 unaffected live births), and an additional 0.03 QALYs per live birth. This modelling suggests that the use of IVF and PGD to achieve an unaffected child for patients with heritable retinoblastoma resulted in an overall cost-saving. There was an increase in QALYs per baby across all uptake rates. However, in total, fewer babies were born following the IVF and PGD pathway.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.03.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness study\",\"authors\":\"D. Schofield ,&nbsp;M.J.B. Zeppel ,&nbsp;S. Staffieri ,&nbsp;R.N. Shrestha ,&nbsp;D. Jelovic ,&nbsp;E. Lee ,&nbsp;R.V. Jamieson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the reproductive choices of patients with heritable retinoblastoma. The study modelled the costs of three cycles of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and PGD across all uptake rates of PGD, number of children affected with retinoblastoma at each uptake rate and the estimated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the Australian public healthcare perspective. The intervention was the use of three cycles (one fresh and two frozen) of IVF and PGD with the aim of live births unaffected by the retinoblastoma phenotype. Compared with the standard care pathway (i.e. natural pregnancy), IVF and PGD resulted in a cost-saving to 18 years of age of AUD$2,747,294 for a base case of 100 couples with an uptake rate of 50%. IVF and PGD resulted in fewer affected (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->56) and unaffected (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->78) live births compared with standard care (71 affected and 83 unaffected live births), and an additional 0.03 QALYs per live birth. This modelling suggests that the use of IVF and PGD to achieve an unaffected child for patients with heritable retinoblastoma resulted in an overall cost-saving. There was an increase in QALYs per baby across all uptake rates. However, in total, fewer babies were born following the IVF and PGD pathway.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.03.001\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661820300095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661820300095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究旨在探讨胚胎植入前遗传学诊断(PGD)对遗传性视网膜母细胞瘤患者生殖选择的成本效益。该研究模拟了三个周期体外受精(IVF)和PGD在所有PGD摄取率下的成本,在每种摄取率下受视网膜母细胞瘤影响的儿童数量以及获得的估计质量调整生命年(QALYs)。从澳大利亚公共保健的角度进行了成本效益分析。干预是使用三个周期(一个新鲜和两个冷冻)的IVF和PGD,目的是活产不受视网膜母细胞瘤表型的影响。与标准护理途径(即自然妊娠)相比,在100对夫妇的基础病例中,试管婴儿和PGD为18岁夫妇节省了2,747,294澳元的成本,吸收率为50%。与标准护理(71例受影响活产和83例未受影响活产)相比,IVF和PGD导致受影响活产(n = 56)和未受影响活产(n = 78)更少,每个活产额外0.03个QALYs。该模型表明,使用体外受精和PGD使遗传性视网膜母细胞瘤患者获得未受影响的孩子可以节省总体成本。在所有的摄取率中,每个婴儿的QALYs都有所增加。然而,总体而言,遵循IVF和PGD途径出生的婴儿较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness study

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness study

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness study

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for retinoblastoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness study

This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the reproductive choices of patients with heritable retinoblastoma. The study modelled the costs of three cycles of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and PGD across all uptake rates of PGD, number of children affected with retinoblastoma at each uptake rate and the estimated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the Australian public healthcare perspective. The intervention was the use of three cycles (one fresh and two frozen) of IVF and PGD with the aim of live births unaffected by the retinoblastoma phenotype. Compared with the standard care pathway (i.e. natural pregnancy), IVF and PGD resulted in a cost-saving to 18 years of age of AUD$2,747,294 for a base case of 100 couples with an uptake rate of 50%. IVF and PGD resulted in fewer affected (n = 56) and unaffected (n = 78) live births compared with standard care (71 affected and 83 unaffected live births), and an additional 0.03 QALYs per live birth. This modelling suggests that the use of IVF and PGD to achieve an unaffected child for patients with heritable retinoblastoma resulted in an overall cost-saving. There was an increase in QALYs per baby across all uptake rates. However, in total, fewer babies were born following the IVF and PGD pathway.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信