PET/CT成像作为鉴别高分化与去分化脂肪肉瘤的诊断工具。

Q2 Medicine
Sarcoma Pub Date : 2020-05-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/8363986
Amanda Parkes, Elizabeth Urquiola, Priya Bhosale, Heather Lin, Kelsey Watson, Wei-Lien Wang, Barry Feig, Keila Torres, Christina L Roland, Anthony P Conley, Maria Zarzour, J Andrew Livingston, Ravin Ratan, Joseph Ludwig, Dejka M Araujo, Vinod Ravi, Robert S Benjamin, Shreyaskumar Patel, Neeta Somaiah
{"title":"PET/CT成像作为鉴别高分化与去分化脂肪肉瘤的诊断工具。","authors":"Amanda Parkes,&nbsp;Elizabeth Urquiola,&nbsp;Priya Bhosale,&nbsp;Heather Lin,&nbsp;Kelsey Watson,&nbsp;Wei-Lien Wang,&nbsp;Barry Feig,&nbsp;Keila Torres,&nbsp;Christina L Roland,&nbsp;Anthony P Conley,&nbsp;Maria Zarzour,&nbsp;J Andrew Livingston,&nbsp;Ravin Ratan,&nbsp;Joseph Ludwig,&nbsp;Dejka M Araujo,&nbsp;Vinod Ravi,&nbsp;Robert S Benjamin,&nbsp;Shreyaskumar Patel,&nbsp;Neeta Somaiah","doi":"10.1155/2020/8363986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distinguishing well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is essential given distinct treatment paradigms and chemosensitivity. Percutaneous biopsy has a low sensitivity for detecting DDLPS. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in identifying WDLPS versus DDLPS. An independent radiologist reviewed PET/CT images to identify target lesions and determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). An independent pathologist review confirmed WDLPS or DDLPS histology. A binary cutoff point of SUVmax was identified using a classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm. We identified 20 patients with WDLPS or DDLPS with 26 PET/CTs performed for separate recurrences that were followed by surgical sampling. Of the 26 records, 12 were DDLPS (46%) and 14 were WDLPS (54%). Patients with DDLPS had significantly higher SUVmax than those with WDLPS (<i>p</i> value = 0.0035). A SUVmax of 4 was identified as the cutoff point. Using this cutoff, the sensitivity of SUVmax identifying a case as DDLPS was 83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%, 97.9%) and the specificity was 85.7% (95% CI: 57.2%, 98.2%). PET/CT is a sensitive and specific diagnostic tool to identify the presence of dedifferentiation within the tumor.</p>","PeriodicalId":21431,"journal":{"name":"Sarcoma","volume":"2020 ","pages":"8363986"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/8363986","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Parkes,&nbsp;Elizabeth Urquiola,&nbsp;Priya Bhosale,&nbsp;Heather Lin,&nbsp;Kelsey Watson,&nbsp;Wei-Lien Wang,&nbsp;Barry Feig,&nbsp;Keila Torres,&nbsp;Christina L Roland,&nbsp;Anthony P Conley,&nbsp;Maria Zarzour,&nbsp;J Andrew Livingston,&nbsp;Ravin Ratan,&nbsp;Joseph Ludwig,&nbsp;Dejka M Araujo,&nbsp;Vinod Ravi,&nbsp;Robert S Benjamin,&nbsp;Shreyaskumar Patel,&nbsp;Neeta Somaiah\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/8363986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Distinguishing well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is essential given distinct treatment paradigms and chemosensitivity. Percutaneous biopsy has a low sensitivity for detecting DDLPS. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in identifying WDLPS versus DDLPS. An independent radiologist reviewed PET/CT images to identify target lesions and determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). An independent pathologist review confirmed WDLPS or DDLPS histology. A binary cutoff point of SUVmax was identified using a classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm. We identified 20 patients with WDLPS or DDLPS with 26 PET/CTs performed for separate recurrences that were followed by surgical sampling. Of the 26 records, 12 were DDLPS (46%) and 14 were WDLPS (54%). Patients with DDLPS had significantly higher SUVmax than those with WDLPS (<i>p</i> value = 0.0035). A SUVmax of 4 was identified as the cutoff point. Using this cutoff, the sensitivity of SUVmax identifying a case as DDLPS was 83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%, 97.9%) and the specificity was 85.7% (95% CI: 57.2%, 98.2%). PET/CT is a sensitive and specific diagnostic tool to identify the presence of dedifferentiation within the tumor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sarcoma\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"8363986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/8363986\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sarcoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8363986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sarcoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8363986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

鉴于不同的治疗模式和化疗敏感性,区分高分化脂肪肉瘤(wdlp)和去分化脂肪肉瘤(DDLPS)是必要的。经皮活检检测DDLPS的敏感性较低。我们试图确定正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)在识别WDLPS和DDLPS中的诊断效用。一位独立的放射科医生检查PET/CT图像以确定目标病变并确定最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)。独立病理学家复查证实为wdlp或DDLPS组织学。采用分类回归树(CART)算法确定了SUVmax的二值截断点。我们确定了20例wdlp或DDLPS患者,分别进行了26次PET/ ct检查,并进行了手术取样。26例中,12例为ddlp(46%), 14例为WDLPS(54%)。DDLPS患者的SUVmax显著高于WDLPS患者(p值= 0.0035)。SUVmax值为4被确定为临界值。使用此截止点,SUVmax识别DDLPS病例的敏感性为83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%, 97.9%),特异性为85.7% (95% CI: 57.2%, 98.2%)。PET/CT是一种敏感而特异的诊断工具,可识别肿瘤内是否存在去分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma.

PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma.

PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma.

PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma.

Distinguishing well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is essential given distinct treatment paradigms and chemosensitivity. Percutaneous biopsy has a low sensitivity for detecting DDLPS. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in identifying WDLPS versus DDLPS. An independent radiologist reviewed PET/CT images to identify target lesions and determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). An independent pathologist review confirmed WDLPS or DDLPS histology. A binary cutoff point of SUVmax was identified using a classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm. We identified 20 patients with WDLPS or DDLPS with 26 PET/CTs performed for separate recurrences that were followed by surgical sampling. Of the 26 records, 12 were DDLPS (46%) and 14 were WDLPS (54%). Patients with DDLPS had significantly higher SUVmax than those with WDLPS (p value = 0.0035). A SUVmax of 4 was identified as the cutoff point. Using this cutoff, the sensitivity of SUVmax identifying a case as DDLPS was 83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%, 97.9%) and the specificity was 85.7% (95% CI: 57.2%, 98.2%). PET/CT is a sensitive and specific diagnostic tool to identify the presence of dedifferentiation within the tumor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sarcoma
Sarcoma Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Sarcoma is dedicated to publishing papers covering all aspects of connective tissue oncology research. It brings together work from scientists and clinicians carrying out a broad range of research in this field, including the basic sciences, molecular biology and pathology and the clinical sciences of epidemiology, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. High-quality papers concerning the entire range of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in both adults and children, including Kaposi"s sarcoma, are published as well as preclinical and animal studies. This journal provides a central forum for the description of advances in diagnosis, assessment and treatment of this rarely seen, but often mismanaged, group of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信