米非司酮、米索前列醇诱导远程流产与临床用药流产的比较

Q2 Medicine
Ellen R Wiebe , Mackenzie Campbell , Harani Ramasamy , Michaela Kelly
{"title":"米非司酮、米索前列醇诱导远程流产与临床用药流产的比较","authors":"Ellen R Wiebe ,&nbsp;Mackenzie Campbell ,&nbsp;Harani Ramasamy ,&nbsp;Michaela Kelly","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to compare the practical aspects of providing medication abortions through telemedicine and in-person clinic visits so that clinics can use this information when planning to add this service.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We conducted a comparative retrospective chart review comparing telemedicine medication abortions to a control group matched for date seen. We extracted and compared demographics, use of dating ultrasound, outcomes and unscheduled visits or communications with staff and physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, we provided 4340 medication abortions, of which 182 (4.2%) were provided through by telemedicine; 199 patients met the criteria to be in the control group. The mean age was 28.7 years for telemedicine patients and 28.1 years for in-person patients (p = .38). The mean gestational ages were also similar, 48.2 days for telemedicine patients and 46.5 days for in-person patients (p = .03). Only 33 (18.1%) of telemedicine patients had dating ultrasounds compared to 199 (100%) of in-clinic patients (p &lt; .001). The proportions of documented completed abortions (164/182, 90.1% and 179/199, 89.9%, p = .76) were similar, as were the proportions of aspirations for completion (6/182, 3.3% and 9/199, 4.5%, p = .54) and the proportions lost to follow-up (5.5% and 6.6%, p = .66). There were 10 complications in each group (5.5% of telemedicine patients and 5.0% of in-clinic patients) (p &gt; 0.5). Unscheduled communications with office assistants were greater in the telemedicine patients than the in-person patients (84/182, 46.2% vs. 43/199, 21.6% in-person, p &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found that telemedicine patients required more unscheduled communications and received ultrasounds far less often compared to in-clinic patients.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>We could provide telemedicine without the need for ultrasound to most women. Larger studies without routine ultrasound use are needed to validate our findings. Unscheduled communication with clinic staff was more frequent with telemedicine medication abortion patients. This information may help clinics when planning to add this service.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100023"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100023","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing telemedicine to in-clinic medication abortions induced with mifepristone and misoprostol\",\"authors\":\"Ellen R Wiebe ,&nbsp;Mackenzie Campbell ,&nbsp;Harani Ramasamy ,&nbsp;Michaela Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to compare the practical aspects of providing medication abortions through telemedicine and in-person clinic visits so that clinics can use this information when planning to add this service.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We conducted a comparative retrospective chart review comparing telemedicine medication abortions to a control group matched for date seen. We extracted and compared demographics, use of dating ultrasound, outcomes and unscheduled visits or communications with staff and physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, we provided 4340 medication abortions, of which 182 (4.2%) were provided through by telemedicine; 199 patients met the criteria to be in the control group. The mean age was 28.7 years for telemedicine patients and 28.1 years for in-person patients (p = .38). The mean gestational ages were also similar, 48.2 days for telemedicine patients and 46.5 days for in-person patients (p = .03). Only 33 (18.1%) of telemedicine patients had dating ultrasounds compared to 199 (100%) of in-clinic patients (p &lt; .001). The proportions of documented completed abortions (164/182, 90.1% and 179/199, 89.9%, p = .76) were similar, as were the proportions of aspirations for completion (6/182, 3.3% and 9/199, 4.5%, p = .54) and the proportions lost to follow-up (5.5% and 6.6%, p = .66). There were 10 complications in each group (5.5% of telemedicine patients and 5.0% of in-clinic patients) (p &gt; 0.5). Unscheduled communications with office assistants were greater in the telemedicine patients than the in-person patients (84/182, 46.2% vs. 43/199, 21.6% in-person, p &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found that telemedicine patients required more unscheduled communications and received ultrasounds far less often compared to in-clinic patients.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>We could provide telemedicine without the need for ultrasound to most women. Larger studies without routine ultrasound use are needed to validate our findings. Unscheduled communication with clinic staff was more frequent with telemedicine medication abortion patients. This information may help clinics when planning to add this service.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100023\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259015162030006X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259015162030006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的比较通过远程医疗和上门就诊提供药物流产的实际情况,以便诊所在计划增加这项服务时可以使用这些信息。研究设计我们进行了一项比较回顾性的图表回顾,比较了远程医疗药物流产与对照组相匹配的日期。我们提取并比较了人口统计数据、使用约会超声、结果、计划外访问或与工作人员和医生的沟通。结果研究期间共提供药物流产4340例,其中远程医疗182例(4.2%);199例患者符合对照组标准。远程医疗患者的平均年龄为28.7 岁,现场患者的平均年龄为28.1 岁(p = .38)。平均胎龄也相似,远程医疗组为48.2 天,现场患者为46.5 天(p = .03)。只有33名(18.1%)远程医疗患者进行了约会超声检查,而199名(100%)门诊患者进行了约会超声检查(p < .001)。记录的完成流产比例(164/182,90.1%和179/199,89.9%,p = .76)相似,期望完成的比例(6/182,3.3%和9/199,4.5%,p = .54)和失去随访的比例(5.5%和6.6%,p = .66)相似。两组并发症发生率分别为10例(远程医疗为5.5%,门诊为5.0%)(p > 0.5)。远程医疗患者与办公室助理计划外沟通的比例高于现场患者(84/182,46.2% vs. 43/199, 21.6%, p < .001)。结论与门诊患者相比,远程医疗患者需要更多的非计划通信,并且接受超声检查的频率远低于门诊患者。我们可以为大多数妇女提供不需要超声波的远程医疗。需要在不使用常规超声的情况下进行更大规模的研究来验证我们的发现。远程医疗药物流产患者与临床工作人员的计划外沟通更为频繁。这些信息可以帮助诊所计划添加这项服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing telemedicine to in-clinic medication abortions induced with mifepristone and misoprostol

Objective

The objective was to compare the practical aspects of providing medication abortions through telemedicine and in-person clinic visits so that clinics can use this information when planning to add this service.

Study design

We conducted a comparative retrospective chart review comparing telemedicine medication abortions to a control group matched for date seen. We extracted and compared demographics, use of dating ultrasound, outcomes and unscheduled visits or communications with staff and physicians.

Results

During the study period, we provided 4340 medication abortions, of which 182 (4.2%) were provided through by telemedicine; 199 patients met the criteria to be in the control group. The mean age was 28.7 years for telemedicine patients and 28.1 years for in-person patients (p = .38). The mean gestational ages were also similar, 48.2 days for telemedicine patients and 46.5 days for in-person patients (p = .03). Only 33 (18.1%) of telemedicine patients had dating ultrasounds compared to 199 (100%) of in-clinic patients (p < .001). The proportions of documented completed abortions (164/182, 90.1% and 179/199, 89.9%, p = .76) were similar, as were the proportions of aspirations for completion (6/182, 3.3% and 9/199, 4.5%, p = .54) and the proportions lost to follow-up (5.5% and 6.6%, p = .66). There were 10 complications in each group (5.5% of telemedicine patients and 5.0% of in-clinic patients) (p > 0.5). Unscheduled communications with office assistants were greater in the telemedicine patients than the in-person patients (84/182, 46.2% vs. 43/199, 21.6% in-person, p < .001).

Conclusion

We found that telemedicine patients required more unscheduled communications and received ultrasounds far less often compared to in-clinic patients.

Implications

We could provide telemedicine without the need for ultrasound to most women. Larger studies without routine ultrasound use are needed to validate our findings. Unscheduled communication with clinic staff was more frequent with telemedicine medication abortion patients. This information may help clinics when planning to add this service.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信