联合激素避孕药在欧洲使用前后,欧盟委员会授权产品信息的变化

Q2 Medicine
Deeksha Khialani , Mary Elizabeth Jones , Szimonetta Komjáthiné Szépligeti , Anne Gulbech Ording , Vera Ehrenstein , Irene Petersen , Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg
{"title":"联合激素避孕药在欧洲使用前后,欧盟委员会授权产品信息的变化","authors":"Deeksha Khialani ,&nbsp;Mary Elizabeth Jones ,&nbsp;Szimonetta Komjáthiné Szépligeti ,&nbsp;Anne Gulbech Ording ,&nbsp;Vera Ehrenstein ,&nbsp;Irene Petersen ,&nbsp;Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We investigated combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) prescribing patterns (focusing on combined oral contraceptives; COC) in three countries (Netherlands, Denmark, United Kingdom) in a time period preceding and in a time period following the European Commission's decision to update product information, and we estimated changes in incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) between the two periods.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We conducted a drug utilization analysis and a cohort study using routinely collected data. We calculated number, proportion and incidence rate of new users, switchers, and stoppers of COC in both time periods. VTE incidence was calculated in new users of COC and in all women aged 18–49 years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all countries, the largest proportion (&gt;<!--> <!-->75%) of new users used COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate, (i.e., indicated by European Medicines Agency (EMA) as the safest preparations) in both time periods. Switching did not demonstrate a clear pattern towards these types of COC and distribution of stoppers was similar in both time periods. While the proportion of new users initiating COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate increased slightly, this did not translate to a decrease in the overall VTE incidence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All three countries had the greatest proportion of women initiating a COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate, and this proportion increased in the period after the European Commission decision albeit the increase was small due to the high percentage of use before the decision. This did not translate into a measureable change in the incidence of VTE.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Both before and after the European Commission's decision, the largest proportion of new users started with combined oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate. Earlier studies had already indicated an increased risk of VTE associated with COC containing other progestogens compared with these preparations, so it is possible that physicians were already preferentially prescribing COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate to new users.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100018","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined hormonal contraceptive use in Europe before and after the European Commission mandated changes in product information\",\"authors\":\"Deeksha Khialani ,&nbsp;Mary Elizabeth Jones ,&nbsp;Szimonetta Komjáthiné Szépligeti ,&nbsp;Anne Gulbech Ording ,&nbsp;Vera Ehrenstein ,&nbsp;Irene Petersen ,&nbsp;Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We investigated combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) prescribing patterns (focusing on combined oral contraceptives; COC) in three countries (Netherlands, Denmark, United Kingdom) in a time period preceding and in a time period following the European Commission's decision to update product information, and we estimated changes in incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) between the two periods.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We conducted a drug utilization analysis and a cohort study using routinely collected data. We calculated number, proportion and incidence rate of new users, switchers, and stoppers of COC in both time periods. VTE incidence was calculated in new users of COC and in all women aged 18–49 years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all countries, the largest proportion (&gt;<!--> <!-->75%) of new users used COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate, (i.e., indicated by European Medicines Agency (EMA) as the safest preparations) in both time periods. Switching did not demonstrate a clear pattern towards these types of COC and distribution of stoppers was similar in both time periods. While the proportion of new users initiating COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate increased slightly, this did not translate to a decrease in the overall VTE incidence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All three countries had the greatest proportion of women initiating a COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate, and this proportion increased in the period after the European Commission decision albeit the increase was small due to the high percentage of use before the decision. This did not translate into a measureable change in the incidence of VTE.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Both before and after the European Commission's decision, the largest proportion of new users started with combined oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate. Earlier studies had already indicated an increased risk of VTE associated with COC containing other progestogens compared with these preparations, so it is possible that physicians were already preferentially prescribing COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate to new users.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100018\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的探讨复方激素避孕药(CHC)的处方模式(以复方口服避孕药为主;COC)在三个国家(荷兰、丹麦和英国)在欧盟委员会决定更新产品信息之前和之后的一段时间内,我们估计了两个时期之间静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生率的变化。研究设计我们使用常规收集的数据进行了药物利用分析和队列研究。我们计算了两个时间段COC的新使用者、切换者和停止者的数量、比例和发病率。计算COC新使用者和所有18-49岁 女性的静脉血栓栓塞发生率。结果在所有国家中,比例最大的是(>75%)的新使用者在这两个时间段内使用了含有左炔诺孕酮、去甲睾酮或诺格估计(即欧洲药品管理局(EMA)指出的最安全制剂)的COC。这两种类型的COC的转换并没有显示出明确的模式,并且在两个时间段内塞的分布相似。虽然新使用者开始使用含有左炔诺孕酮、去甲睾酮或诺格估计的COC的比例略有增加,但这并没有转化为静脉血栓栓塞总发病率的降低。这三个国家的妇女开始服用含有左炔诺孕酮、去甲睾酮或诺格估计的COC的比例最大,而且这一比例在欧盟委员会决定后有所增加,尽管由于在决定前使用的比例很高,增加幅度很小。这并没有转化为静脉血栓栓塞发生率的可测量变化。在欧盟委员会决定之前和之后,最大比例的新使用者开始使用含有左炔诺孕酮、诺西酮或诺格估计的联合口服避孕药。早期的研究已经表明,与这些制剂相比,含有其他孕激素的COC与静脉血栓栓塞的风险增加有关,因此,医生可能已经优先给新使用者开含有左炔诺孕酮、去甲睾酮或诺格估计的COC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined hormonal contraceptive use in Europe before and after the European Commission mandated changes in product information

Objectives

We investigated combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) prescribing patterns (focusing on combined oral contraceptives; COC) in three countries (Netherlands, Denmark, United Kingdom) in a time period preceding and in a time period following the European Commission's decision to update product information, and we estimated changes in incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) between the two periods.

Study design

We conducted a drug utilization analysis and a cohort study using routinely collected data. We calculated number, proportion and incidence rate of new users, switchers, and stoppers of COC in both time periods. VTE incidence was calculated in new users of COC and in all women aged 18–49 years.

Results

In all countries, the largest proportion (> 75%) of new users used COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate, (i.e., indicated by European Medicines Agency (EMA) as the safest preparations) in both time periods. Switching did not demonstrate a clear pattern towards these types of COC and distribution of stoppers was similar in both time periods. While the proportion of new users initiating COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate increased slightly, this did not translate to a decrease in the overall VTE incidence.

Conclusion

All three countries had the greatest proportion of women initiating a COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate, and this proportion increased in the period after the European Commission decision albeit the increase was small due to the high percentage of use before the decision. This did not translate into a measureable change in the incidence of VTE.

Implications

Both before and after the European Commission's decision, the largest proportion of new users started with combined oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate. Earlier studies had already indicated an increased risk of VTE associated with COC containing other progestogens compared with these preparations, so it is possible that physicians were already preferentially prescribing COC containing levonorgestrel, norethisterone, or norgestimate to new users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信