州一级的医疗保险覆盖率和避孕药具使用:2017年行为风险因素监测系统的调查结果

Q2 Medicine
Megan L. Kavanaugh, Ayana Douglas-Hall, Sean M. Finn
{"title":"州一级的医疗保险覆盖率和避孕药具使用:2017年行为风险因素监测系统的调查结果","authors":"Megan L. Kavanaugh,&nbsp;Ayana Douglas-Hall,&nbsp;Sean M. Finn","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2019.100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine associations between health insurance coverage, income level and contraceptive use — overall and most/moderately effective method use — among women ages 18–44 at risk of pregnancy, within and across 41 United States jurisdictions in 2017.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Using data from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we calculated the proportions of women using any contraceptive method and using a most or moderately effective method for each state/territory and across all jurisdictions, categorized by health insurance coverage and income groups. For both contraceptive use outcomes, we ran simple and multivariable logistic regression models to test for significant differences in outcomes between insured and uninsured individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Across jurisdictions, compared to uninsured women, those who had health care coverage had higher levels of contraceptive use (65% versus 59%; p &lt; .001) and most/moderately effective contraceptive use (43% compared to 35%; p &lt; .001); low-income women with coverage also had higher levels of contraceptive use (64% versus 61%; p &lt; .05) and most or moderately effective contraceptive use (42% versus 36%; p &lt; .01) than their uninsured counterparts. Controlling for individual-level demographic characteristics, health insurance coverage was associated with increased odds of most or moderately effective contraceptive use across jurisdictions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.33, p &lt; .01). In 11 states, insured women had significantly higher odds of at least one contraceptive use metric than their uninsured counterparts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Variation in contraceptive use across the states likely reflects broader demographic, social and structural differences across state and local populations. States' political will and support around contraceptive access likely play a role in individuals' ability to obtain and use contraception.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Our key finding that insurance coverage is significantly associated with use of most/moderately effective contraceptive methods across the states but not any contraceptive use underscores the importance of health insurance in aiding access to methods that are more costly and often require a visit to a health care provider.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2019.100014","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System\",\"authors\":\"Megan L. Kavanaugh,&nbsp;Ayana Douglas-Hall,&nbsp;Sean M. Finn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2019.100014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine associations between health insurance coverage, income level and contraceptive use — overall and most/moderately effective method use — among women ages 18–44 at risk of pregnancy, within and across 41 United States jurisdictions in 2017.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Using data from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we calculated the proportions of women using any contraceptive method and using a most or moderately effective method for each state/territory and across all jurisdictions, categorized by health insurance coverage and income groups. For both contraceptive use outcomes, we ran simple and multivariable logistic regression models to test for significant differences in outcomes between insured and uninsured individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Across jurisdictions, compared to uninsured women, those who had health care coverage had higher levels of contraceptive use (65% versus 59%; p &lt; .001) and most/moderately effective contraceptive use (43% compared to 35%; p &lt; .001); low-income women with coverage also had higher levels of contraceptive use (64% versus 61%; p &lt; .05) and most or moderately effective contraceptive use (42% versus 36%; p &lt; .01) than their uninsured counterparts. Controlling for individual-level demographic characteristics, health insurance coverage was associated with increased odds of most or moderately effective contraceptive use across jurisdictions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.33, p &lt; .01). In 11 states, insured women had significantly higher odds of at least one contraceptive use metric than their uninsured counterparts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Variation in contraceptive use across the states likely reflects broader demographic, social and structural differences across state and local populations. States' political will and support around contraceptive access likely play a role in individuals' ability to obtain and use contraception.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Our key finding that insurance coverage is significantly associated with use of most/moderately effective contraceptive methods across the states but not any contraceptive use underscores the importance of health insurance in aiding access to methods that are more costly and often require a visit to a health care provider.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2019.100014\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151619300139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151619300139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

目的研究2017年美国41个司法管辖区内18-44岁有怀孕风险的妇女的健康保险覆盖率、收入水平和避孕药具使用(总体和最有效/中等有效的方法使用)之间的关系。研究设计使用2017年行为风险因素监测系统的数据,我们计算了每个州/地区和所有司法管辖区使用任何避孕方法并使用最有效或中等有效方法的女性比例,并按健康保险覆盖范围和收入群体进行了分类。对于这两种避孕措施的使用结果,我们运行了简单和多变量逻辑回归模型来检验参保和未参保个体之间的结果是否存在显著差异。结果在各个司法管辖区,与没有保险的妇女相比,有医疗保险的妇女使用避孕药具的水平更高(65%对59%;P < .001)和最有效/中等有效的避孕措施使用(43%对35%;p & lt; 措施);低收入妇女的避孕药具使用率也较高(64%对61%;P < .05)和最有效或中等有效的避孕措施使用(42%对36%;P < .01)。在控制了个人层面的人口统计学特征后,健康保险覆盖率与各司法管辖区使用最有效或中等有效避孕措施的几率增加相关(调整后的优势比 = 1.33,p < .01)。在11个州,有保险的妇女使用至少一种避孕措施的几率明显高于没有保险的妇女。结论:各州避孕药具使用的差异可能反映了州和地方人口在人口、社会和结构上的广泛差异。各国在获取避孕药具方面的政治意愿和支持可能在个人获得和使用避孕药具的能力方面发挥作用。含义我们的关键发现是,保险覆盖率与各州使用最有效/中等有效的避孕方法显著相关,但与任何避孕方法的使用无关,这突显了健康保险在帮助获得费用较高且往往需要前往保健提供者处就诊的方法方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Objective

To examine associations between health insurance coverage, income level and contraceptive use — overall and most/moderately effective method use — among women ages 18–44 at risk of pregnancy, within and across 41 United States jurisdictions in 2017.

Study design

Using data from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we calculated the proportions of women using any contraceptive method and using a most or moderately effective method for each state/territory and across all jurisdictions, categorized by health insurance coverage and income groups. For both contraceptive use outcomes, we ran simple and multivariable logistic regression models to test for significant differences in outcomes between insured and uninsured individuals.

Results

Across jurisdictions, compared to uninsured women, those who had health care coverage had higher levels of contraceptive use (65% versus 59%; p < .001) and most/moderately effective contraceptive use (43% compared to 35%; p < .001); low-income women with coverage also had higher levels of contraceptive use (64% versus 61%; p < .05) and most or moderately effective contraceptive use (42% versus 36%; p < .01) than their uninsured counterparts. Controlling for individual-level demographic characteristics, health insurance coverage was associated with increased odds of most or moderately effective contraceptive use across jurisdictions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.33, p < .01). In 11 states, insured women had significantly higher odds of at least one contraceptive use metric than their uninsured counterparts.

Conclusions

Variation in contraceptive use across the states likely reflects broader demographic, social and structural differences across state and local populations. States' political will and support around contraceptive access likely play a role in individuals' ability to obtain and use contraception.

Implications

Our key finding that insurance coverage is significantly associated with use of most/moderately effective contraceptive methods across the states but not any contraceptive use underscores the importance of health insurance in aiding access to methods that are more costly and often require a visit to a health care provider.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信