在金沙萨的非正式药店提供紧急避孕药:一项神秘客户研究的结果。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences
Julie H Hernandez, Pierre Akilimalib, Muanda Fidèle Mbadu
{"title":"在金沙萨的非正式药店提供紧急避孕药:一项神秘客户研究的结果。","authors":"Julie H Hernandez,&nbsp;Pierre Akilimalib,&nbsp;Muanda Fidèle Mbadu","doi":"10.1363/46e9120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Despite the prominence of informal drug shops as sources of contraceptives in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, evidence on the quality of services they provide is scant. Given efforts to leverage the private sector to increase contraceptive access, evaluating the contraceptive knowledge, attitudes and practices of these providers is warranted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In April-May 2018, a mystery client study on the provision of emergency contraception (EC) was conducted in 854 informal drug shops in Kinshasa. Twelve mystery clients, presenting as younger or older than 18 and married or unmarried, visited the outlets to request something to \"avoid getting pregnant\" after unprotected sex, and to purchase the recommended medicine. Frequencies of key outcomes were calculated, and chi-square testing assessed associations between client age and marital status and the methods and counseling received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, providers recommended EC in 77% of visits, and in 54% of visits, clients left with the method. In 62% of the visits in which providers recommended EC, they specified a time frame for taking the pill; the correct window of efficacy was indicated in 75% of these visits. In 18% of visits, other (noncontraceptive) drugs were provided, and in 7% of visits, providers did not help the client. Regardless of the visit outcome, providers were nearly always deemed respectful (96%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Leveraging informal outlets to increase contraceptive provision will require identifying quality outlets, strengthening supply chains and advocating for policy changes that recognize them as effective contraceptive providers without decreasing their perceived advantages for women.</p>","PeriodicalId":46940,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provision of Emergency Contraceptive Pills in Kinshasa's Informal Drug Shops: Results from a Mystery Client Study.\",\"authors\":\"Julie H Hernandez,&nbsp;Pierre Akilimalib,&nbsp;Muanda Fidèle Mbadu\",\"doi\":\"10.1363/46e9120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Despite the prominence of informal drug shops as sources of contraceptives in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, evidence on the quality of services they provide is scant. Given efforts to leverage the private sector to increase contraceptive access, evaluating the contraceptive knowledge, attitudes and practices of these providers is warranted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In April-May 2018, a mystery client study on the provision of emergency contraception (EC) was conducted in 854 informal drug shops in Kinshasa. Twelve mystery clients, presenting as younger or older than 18 and married or unmarried, visited the outlets to request something to \\\"avoid getting pregnant\\\" after unprotected sex, and to purchase the recommended medicine. Frequencies of key outcomes were calculated, and chi-square testing assessed associations between client age and marital status and the methods and counseling received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, providers recommended EC in 77% of visits, and in 54% of visits, clients left with the method. In 62% of the visits in which providers recommended EC, they specified a time frame for taking the pill; the correct window of efficacy was indicated in 75% of these visits. In 18% of visits, other (noncontraceptive) drugs were provided, and in 7% of visits, providers did not help the client. Regardless of the visit outcome, providers were nearly always deemed respectful (96%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Leveraging informal outlets to increase contraceptive provision will require identifying quality outlets, strengthening supply chains and advocating for policy changes that recognize them as effective contraceptive providers without decreasing their perceived advantages for women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1363/46e9120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/46e9120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:尽管在刚果民主共和国金沙萨,非正规药店作为避孕药具的重要来源,但关于它们提供的服务质量的证据很少。鉴于利用私营部门增加避孕药具获取的努力,有必要评估这些提供者的避孕知识、态度和做法。方法:2018年4 - 5月,在金沙萨854家非正规药店开展紧急避孕(EC)神秘客户调查。12名神秘客户,年龄在18岁以下或18岁以上,已婚或未婚,来到这些网点,要求在无保护的性行为后“避免怀孕”,并购买推荐的药物。计算关键结果的频率,卡方检验评估客户年龄和婚姻状况以及所接受的方法和咨询之间的关联。结果:总体而言,提供者在77%的访问中推荐了EC,在54%的访问中,客户离开了该方法。在62%的医生推荐EC的病人中,他们指定了服用避孕药的时间框架;75%的访视显示了正确的疗效窗口。在18%的访问中,提供了其他(非避孕)药物,在7%的访问中,提供者没有帮助客户。无论访问结果如何,提供者几乎总是被认为是尊重的(96%)。结论:利用非正式渠道增加避孕药具供应将需要确定优质渠道,加强供应链,并倡导政策变革,在不降低其对妇女的感知优势的情况下,将其视为有效的避孕药具提供者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provision of Emergency Contraceptive Pills in Kinshasa's Informal Drug Shops: Results from a Mystery Client Study.

Context: Despite the prominence of informal drug shops as sources of contraceptives in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, evidence on the quality of services they provide is scant. Given efforts to leverage the private sector to increase contraceptive access, evaluating the contraceptive knowledge, attitudes and practices of these providers is warranted.

Methods: In April-May 2018, a mystery client study on the provision of emergency contraception (EC) was conducted in 854 informal drug shops in Kinshasa. Twelve mystery clients, presenting as younger or older than 18 and married or unmarried, visited the outlets to request something to "avoid getting pregnant" after unprotected sex, and to purchase the recommended medicine. Frequencies of key outcomes were calculated, and chi-square testing assessed associations between client age and marital status and the methods and counseling received.

Results: Overall, providers recommended EC in 77% of visits, and in 54% of visits, clients left with the method. In 62% of the visits in which providers recommended EC, they specified a time frame for taking the pill; the correct window of efficacy was indicated in 75% of these visits. In 18% of visits, other (noncontraceptive) drugs were provided, and in 7% of visits, providers did not help the client. Regardless of the visit outcome, providers were nearly always deemed respectful (96%).

Conclusions: Leveraging informal outlets to increase contraceptive provision will require identifying quality outlets, strengthening supply chains and advocating for policy changes that recognize them as effective contraceptive providers without decreasing their perceived advantages for women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信