Cassia da Luz Goulart, Renata Trimer, Adriana Sanches Garcia-Araujo, Flavia Rossi Caruso, Paula Angélica Ricci, Polliana Batista Dos Santos, Renata Gonçalves Mendes, Audrey Borghi-Silva
{"title":"哮喘患者呼吸肌力手工评价的效度、内信度和互信度。","authors":"Cassia da Luz Goulart, Renata Trimer, Adriana Sanches Garcia-Araujo, Flavia Rossi Caruso, Paula Angélica Ricci, Polliana Batista Dos Santos, Renata Gonçalves Mendes, Audrey Borghi-Silva","doi":"10.1002/pri.1852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the concurrent validity, inter and intra-reliability of manual evaluation in Asthma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty six asthma patients were assessed. Maximal respiratory muscle strength (Mrms) was tested by inspiratory and expiratory pressure (MIP and MEP, respectively) trough manovacuometer. In addition, Mrms of diaphragm (anterior and posterior), Intercostals (lower and upper portion) and Rectus abdominal were obtained manually, according to Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. Two independents evaluators, previously trained, made both measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reproducibility of Mrms intra-evaluators: anterior diaphragm (ICCs, 0.79 and 0.67); Posterior portion of the diaphragm (ICCs, 0.43 and 0.51); Upper intercostals (ICCs, 0.47 and 0.40); Lower intercostals (ICCs, 0.81 and 0.51) and rectus abdominal (ICCs, 1.0). Inter-reproducibility of anterior diaphragm was low to moderate, while intercostals (upper and lower portion) was relatively low. However, rectus abdominal presented high reproducibility reflecting in almost perfect agreement. In addition, we found positive correlations between MIP versus Lower Intercostals (r = .60, p = .007) and MEP versus rectus abdominal (r = .41, p = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In asthmatic patients, manual evaluation of the respiratory muscles is reliable. In addition, maximal respiratory pressures using manometer assessment were related to manual evaluation, in special to diaphragm and rectus abdominal muscles.</p>","PeriodicalId":519522,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","volume":" ","pages":"e1852"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pri.1852","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity, intra and inter-reliability of manual evaluation of the respiratory muscle strength in asthmatic patients.\",\"authors\":\"Cassia da Luz Goulart, Renata Trimer, Adriana Sanches Garcia-Araujo, Flavia Rossi Caruso, Paula Angélica Ricci, Polliana Batista Dos Santos, Renata Gonçalves Mendes, Audrey Borghi-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.1852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the concurrent validity, inter and intra-reliability of manual evaluation in Asthma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty six asthma patients were assessed. Maximal respiratory muscle strength (Mrms) was tested by inspiratory and expiratory pressure (MIP and MEP, respectively) trough manovacuometer. In addition, Mrms of diaphragm (anterior and posterior), Intercostals (lower and upper portion) and Rectus abdominal were obtained manually, according to Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. Two independents evaluators, previously trained, made both measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reproducibility of Mrms intra-evaluators: anterior diaphragm (ICCs, 0.79 and 0.67); Posterior portion of the diaphragm (ICCs, 0.43 and 0.51); Upper intercostals (ICCs, 0.47 and 0.40); Lower intercostals (ICCs, 0.81 and 0.51) and rectus abdominal (ICCs, 1.0). Inter-reproducibility of anterior diaphragm was low to moderate, while intercostals (upper and lower portion) was relatively low. However, rectus abdominal presented high reproducibility reflecting in almost perfect agreement. In addition, we found positive correlations between MIP versus Lower Intercostals (r = .60, p = .007) and MEP versus rectus abdominal (r = .41, p = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In asthmatic patients, manual evaluation of the respiratory muscles is reliable. In addition, maximal respiratory pressures using manometer assessment were related to manual evaluation, in special to diaphragm and rectus abdominal muscles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1852\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pri.1852\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/6/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:探讨哮喘患者手工评价的并发效度、相互信度和内部信度。方法:对26例哮喘患者进行评价。呼气压(MIP)和吸气压(MEP)通过压力计检测最大呼吸肌力量(Mrms)。此外,根据医学研究委员会(MRC)的标准,手动获得膈肌(前后)、肋间肌(上下部分)和腹直肌的Mrms。两名经过培训的独立评估人员进行了这两项测量。结果:Mrms内评估器的再现性:前膈(ICCs分别为0.79和0.67);膈肌后段(ICCs, 0.43和0.51);上肋间(ICCs, 0.47和0.40);下肋间肌(ICCs, 0.81和0.51)和腹直肌(ICCs, 1.0)。前横膈膜的可重复性低至中等,而肋间(上、下部分)的可重复性相对较低。然而,腹直肌表现出高度的再现性,反映出几乎完全一致。此外,我们发现MIP与下肋间肌(r = 0.60, p = 0.007)和MEP与腹直肌(r = 0.41, p = 0.04)呈正相关。结论:在哮喘患者中,手工评估呼吸肌是可靠的。此外,使用压力计评估的最大呼吸压力与手动评估有关,特别是膈肌和腹直肌。
Validity, intra and inter-reliability of manual evaluation of the respiratory muscle strength in asthmatic patients.
Objective: This study investigated the concurrent validity, inter and intra-reliability of manual evaluation in Asthma patients.
Methods: Twenty six asthma patients were assessed. Maximal respiratory muscle strength (Mrms) was tested by inspiratory and expiratory pressure (MIP and MEP, respectively) trough manovacuometer. In addition, Mrms of diaphragm (anterior and posterior), Intercostals (lower and upper portion) and Rectus abdominal were obtained manually, according to Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. Two independents evaluators, previously trained, made both measurements.
Results: Reproducibility of Mrms intra-evaluators: anterior diaphragm (ICCs, 0.79 and 0.67); Posterior portion of the diaphragm (ICCs, 0.43 and 0.51); Upper intercostals (ICCs, 0.47 and 0.40); Lower intercostals (ICCs, 0.81 and 0.51) and rectus abdominal (ICCs, 1.0). Inter-reproducibility of anterior diaphragm was low to moderate, while intercostals (upper and lower portion) was relatively low. However, rectus abdominal presented high reproducibility reflecting in almost perfect agreement. In addition, we found positive correlations between MIP versus Lower Intercostals (r = .60, p = .007) and MEP versus rectus abdominal (r = .41, p = .04).
Conclusion: In asthmatic patients, manual evaluation of the respiratory muscles is reliable. In addition, maximal respiratory pressures using manometer assessment were related to manual evaluation, in special to diaphragm and rectus abdominal muscles.