光学相干断层血管造影显示抗vegf治疗后视网膜微血管异常的形态学改变。

Eye and vision (London, England) Pub Date : 2020-06-01 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40662-020-00195-2
Osama A Sorour, Nihaal Mehta, Caroline R Baumal, Akihiro Ishibazawa, Keke Liu, Eleni K Konstantinou, Sarah Martin, Phillip Braun, A Yasin Alibhai, Malvika Arya, Andre J Witkin, Jay S Duker, Nadia K Waheed
{"title":"光学相干断层血管造影显示抗vegf治疗后视网膜微血管异常的形态学改变。","authors":"Osama A Sorour,&nbsp;Nihaal Mehta,&nbsp;Caroline R Baumal,&nbsp;Akihiro Ishibazawa,&nbsp;Keke Liu,&nbsp;Eleni K Konstantinou,&nbsp;Sarah Martin,&nbsp;Phillip Braun,&nbsp;A Yasin Alibhai,&nbsp;Malvika Arya,&nbsp;Andre J Witkin,&nbsp;Jay S Duker,&nbsp;Nadia K Waheed","doi":"10.1186/s40662-020-00195-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To examine the baseline morphological characteristics and alterations in intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs) in response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment, documented by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in diabetic eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, IRMAs were evaluated with multimodal imaging (fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, OCTA) in treatment-naïve diabetic eyes before and after anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) and/or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and compared to diabetic control eyes with similar diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity that did not receive anti-VEGF therapy. The morphological characteristics of IRMAs on enface OCTA imaging were graded by masked readers at baseline, then after anti-VEGF therapy in treated eyes or after observation in control eyes. Characterization of interval changes in an IRMA were based on the following parameters: branching, vessel caliber and area of adjacent capillary non-perfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treated group included 45 IRMA foci from 15 eyes of 11 patients, while the control group included 27 IRMA foci from 15 eyes of 14 patients. Following anti-VEGF treatment, enface OCTA demonstrated that 14 foci of IRMA (31%) demonstrated regression with normalization of appearance of the capillary bed, 20 IRMAs (44%) remained unchanged, six IRMAs (13%) progressed with enlargement or development of new IRMAs and five IRMAs (11%) demonstrated complete obliteration defined as IRMA disappearance with advancing capillary drop-out. In the control group, 17 IRMA (63%) remained stable, 8 IRMAs (29.6%) progressed and 2 experienced total obliteration (7.4%). The difference in rank order between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In eyes with DR status post anti-VEGF therapy, foci of IRMAs have a variable course demonstrating one of four possible outcomes: regression, stability, progression or complete obliteration. In contrast, none of the untreated control diabetic eyes demonstrated regression of IRMAs, consistent with known progression of DR severity in high risk eyes. Morphologic evaluation of IRMAs with OCTA may help to monitor changes in retinal blood flow as well as the response to anti-VEGF treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":520624,"journal":{"name":"Eye and vision (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40662-020-00195-2","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphological changes in intraretinal microvascular abnormalities after anti-VEGF therapy visualized on optical coherence tomography angiography.\",\"authors\":\"Osama A Sorour,&nbsp;Nihaal Mehta,&nbsp;Caroline R Baumal,&nbsp;Akihiro Ishibazawa,&nbsp;Keke Liu,&nbsp;Eleni K Konstantinou,&nbsp;Sarah Martin,&nbsp;Phillip Braun,&nbsp;A Yasin Alibhai,&nbsp;Malvika Arya,&nbsp;Andre J Witkin,&nbsp;Jay S Duker,&nbsp;Nadia K Waheed\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40662-020-00195-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To examine the baseline morphological characteristics and alterations in intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs) in response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment, documented by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in diabetic eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, IRMAs were evaluated with multimodal imaging (fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, OCTA) in treatment-naïve diabetic eyes before and after anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) and/or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and compared to diabetic control eyes with similar diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity that did not receive anti-VEGF therapy. The morphological characteristics of IRMAs on enface OCTA imaging were graded by masked readers at baseline, then after anti-VEGF therapy in treated eyes or after observation in control eyes. Characterization of interval changes in an IRMA were based on the following parameters: branching, vessel caliber and area of adjacent capillary non-perfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treated group included 45 IRMA foci from 15 eyes of 11 patients, while the control group included 27 IRMA foci from 15 eyes of 14 patients. Following anti-VEGF treatment, enface OCTA demonstrated that 14 foci of IRMA (31%) demonstrated regression with normalization of appearance of the capillary bed, 20 IRMAs (44%) remained unchanged, six IRMAs (13%) progressed with enlargement or development of new IRMAs and five IRMAs (11%) demonstrated complete obliteration defined as IRMA disappearance with advancing capillary drop-out. In the control group, 17 IRMA (63%) remained stable, 8 IRMAs (29.6%) progressed and 2 experienced total obliteration (7.4%). The difference in rank order between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In eyes with DR status post anti-VEGF therapy, foci of IRMAs have a variable course demonstrating one of four possible outcomes: regression, stability, progression or complete obliteration. In contrast, none of the untreated control diabetic eyes demonstrated regression of IRMAs, consistent with known progression of DR severity in high risk eyes. Morphologic evaluation of IRMAs with OCTA may help to monitor changes in retinal blood flow as well as the response to anti-VEGF treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye and vision (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40662-020-00195-2\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye and vision (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00195-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and vision (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00195-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:通过光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)检查糖尿病眼抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗后视网膜内微血管异常(IRMAs)的基线形态学特征和改变。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,采用多模式成像(眼底摄影、荧光素血管造影、OCTA)评估treatment-naïve糖尿病眼在抗vegf治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)和/或增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)前后的irma,并与未接受抗vegf治疗的糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)严重程度相似的糖尿病对照眼进行比较。在基线、治疗眼抗vegf治疗后或对照眼观察后,用蒙面阅读器对表面OCTA成像上的irma形态学特征进行分级。IRMA间隔变化的表征基于以下参数:分支,血管口径和邻近毛细血管非灌注面积。结果:治疗组11例15只眼45个IRMA病灶,对照组14例15只眼27个IRMA病灶。在抗vegf治疗后,表面OCTA显示14个IRMA灶(31%)随着毛细血管床外观的正常化而消退,20个IRMA灶(44%)保持不变,6个IRMA灶(13%)随着新IRMA的扩大或发展而进展,5个IRMA灶(11%)随着毛细血管脱落而完全消失。对照组17例(63%)保持稳定,8例(29.6%)进展,2例(7.4%)完全消失。两组间排序差异有统计学意义(p = 0.022)。结论:在抗vegf治疗后出现DR状态的眼睛中,irma的病灶具有可变的过程,表现出四种可能的结果之一:消退、稳定、进展或完全消失。相比之下,未接受治疗的对照糖尿病眼均未表现出irma的消退,这与已知的高危眼DR严重程度的进展一致。使用OCTA对irma进行形态学评估可能有助于监测视网膜血流的变化以及对抗vegf治疗的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Morphological changes in intraretinal microvascular abnormalities after anti-VEGF therapy visualized on optical coherence tomography angiography.

Morphological changes in intraretinal microvascular abnormalities after anti-VEGF therapy visualized on optical coherence tomography angiography.

Morphological changes in intraretinal microvascular abnormalities after anti-VEGF therapy visualized on optical coherence tomography angiography.

Morphological changes in intraretinal microvascular abnormalities after anti-VEGF therapy visualized on optical coherence tomography angiography.

Background: To examine the baseline morphological characteristics and alterations in intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs) in response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment, documented by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in diabetic eyes.

Methods: In this retrospective study, IRMAs were evaluated with multimodal imaging (fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, OCTA) in treatment-naïve diabetic eyes before and after anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) and/or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and compared to diabetic control eyes with similar diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity that did not receive anti-VEGF therapy. The morphological characteristics of IRMAs on enface OCTA imaging were graded by masked readers at baseline, then after anti-VEGF therapy in treated eyes or after observation in control eyes. Characterization of interval changes in an IRMA were based on the following parameters: branching, vessel caliber and area of adjacent capillary non-perfusion.

Results: The treated group included 45 IRMA foci from 15 eyes of 11 patients, while the control group included 27 IRMA foci from 15 eyes of 14 patients. Following anti-VEGF treatment, enface OCTA demonstrated that 14 foci of IRMA (31%) demonstrated regression with normalization of appearance of the capillary bed, 20 IRMAs (44%) remained unchanged, six IRMAs (13%) progressed with enlargement or development of new IRMAs and five IRMAs (11%) demonstrated complete obliteration defined as IRMA disappearance with advancing capillary drop-out. In the control group, 17 IRMA (63%) remained stable, 8 IRMAs (29.6%) progressed and 2 experienced total obliteration (7.4%). The difference in rank order between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.022).

Conclusions: In eyes with DR status post anti-VEGF therapy, foci of IRMAs have a variable course demonstrating one of four possible outcomes: regression, stability, progression or complete obliteration. In contrast, none of the untreated control diabetic eyes demonstrated regression of IRMAs, consistent with known progression of DR severity in high risk eyes. Morphologic evaluation of IRMAs with OCTA may help to monitor changes in retinal blood flow as well as the response to anti-VEGF treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信