深水地平线研究联盟环境健康措施评估

IF 4.6
Huaqin Pan , Stephen W. Edwards , Cataia Ives , Hannah Covert , Emily W. Harville , Maureen Y. Lichtveld , Jeffrey K. Wickliffe , Carol M. Hamilton
{"title":"深水地平线研究联盟环境健康措施评估","authors":"Huaqin Pan ,&nbsp;Stephen W. Edwards ,&nbsp;Cataia Ives ,&nbsp;Hannah Covert ,&nbsp;Emily W. Harville ,&nbsp;Maureen Y. Lichtveld ,&nbsp;Jeffrey K. Wickliffe ,&nbsp;Carol M. Hamilton","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2019.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research consortia play a key role in our understanding of how environmental exposures influence health and wellbeing, especially in the case of catastrophic events such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. A common challenge that prevents the optimal use of these data is the difficulty of harmonizing data regarding the environmental exposures and health effects across the studies within and among consortia. A review of the measures used by members of the Deepwater Horizon Research Consortia highlights the challenges associated with balancing timely implementation of a study to support disaster relief with optimizing the long-term value of the data. The inclusion of common, standard measures at the study design phase and <em>a priori</em> discussions regarding harmonization of study-specific measures among consortia members are key to overcoming this challenge. As more resources become available to support the use of standard measures, researchers now have the tools needed to rapidly coordinate their studies without compromising research focus or timely completion of the original study goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2019.07.003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of environmental health measures in the Deepwater Horizon Research Consortia\",\"authors\":\"Huaqin Pan ,&nbsp;Stephen W. Edwards ,&nbsp;Cataia Ives ,&nbsp;Hannah Covert ,&nbsp;Emily W. Harville ,&nbsp;Maureen Y. Lichtveld ,&nbsp;Jeffrey K. Wickliffe ,&nbsp;Carol M. Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cotox.2019.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research consortia play a key role in our understanding of how environmental exposures influence health and wellbeing, especially in the case of catastrophic events such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. A common challenge that prevents the optimal use of these data is the difficulty of harmonizing data regarding the environmental exposures and health effects across the studies within and among consortia. A review of the measures used by members of the Deepwater Horizon Research Consortia highlights the challenges associated with balancing timely implementation of a study to support disaster relief with optimizing the long-term value of the data. The inclusion of common, standard measures at the study design phase and <em>a priori</em> discussions regarding harmonization of study-specific measures among consortia members are key to overcoming this challenge. As more resources become available to support the use of standard measures, researchers now have the tools needed to rapidly coordinate their studies without compromising research focus or timely completion of the original study goals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2019.07.003\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202018300937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202018300937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究联盟在我们理解环境暴露如何影响健康和福祉方面发挥了关键作用,特别是在深水地平线石油泄漏等灾难性事件的情况下。阻碍这些数据得到最佳利用的一个共同挑战是,难以协调各财团内部和各财团之间关于环境暴露和健康影响的研究数据。对深水地平线研究联盟成员使用的措施进行了回顾,强调了在及时实施研究以支持救灾与优化数据的长期价值之间取得平衡所面临的挑战。在研究设计阶段纳入共同的标准措施,并在财团成员之间先验地讨论如何协调研究特定措施,是克服这一挑战的关键。随着越来越多的资源可用于支持使用标准措施,研究人员现在拥有了快速协调研究所需的工具,而不会影响研究重点或及时完成最初的研究目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment of environmental health measures in the Deepwater Horizon Research Consortia

Research consortia play a key role in our understanding of how environmental exposures influence health and wellbeing, especially in the case of catastrophic events such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. A common challenge that prevents the optimal use of these data is the difficulty of harmonizing data regarding the environmental exposures and health effects across the studies within and among consortia. A review of the measures used by members of the Deepwater Horizon Research Consortia highlights the challenges associated with balancing timely implementation of a study to support disaster relief with optimizing the long-term value of the data. The inclusion of common, standard measures at the study design phase and a priori discussions regarding harmonization of study-specific measures among consortia members are key to overcoming this challenge. As more resources become available to support the use of standard measures, researchers now have the tools needed to rapidly coordinate their studies without compromising research focus or timely completion of the original study goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current opinion in toxicology
Current opinion in toxicology Toxicology, Biochemistry
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信