轮椅建议的趋势在专门的座位部门。

Cara E Masselink
{"title":"轮椅建议的趋势在专门的座位部门。","authors":"Cara E Masselink","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2020.1772899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the early 2000 s, investigators at the federal government noted growing Medicare expenditures for power mobility devices, which were related to high profit margins and fraudulent activity. Medicare responded with policy and program changes, and stakeholders in wheelchair service delivery have noticed an impact on their services and changes in wheelchair user access to needed equipment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined 4,252 wheelchair clinical recommendations made by full-time wheelchair seating department therapists between 2007 and 2017 through a retrospective chart review. Demographic counts and percentages were examined in relationship with equipment over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of recommendations increased over time in all age groups, but most for people aged 19-64. Fifty percent of people with Medicare were younger than 65, and 63% of Medicare recommendations were for complex wheelchair bases. Overall, decreased recommendations were noted in 2008, consistent with the economic recession. An increase in recommendations occurred from 2014 to 2017, consistent with the onset of the Affordable Care Act.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most change occurred for middle and older age groups, complex manual wheelchairs, and standard power mobility devices. This study supports the need for a separate Medicare category of Complex Rehabilitation Technology for those with severe disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":282300,"journal":{"name":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","volume":" ","pages":"264-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10400435.2020.1772899","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in wheelchair recommendations in a dedicated seating department.\",\"authors\":\"Cara E Masselink\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10400435.2020.1772899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the early 2000 s, investigators at the federal government noted growing Medicare expenditures for power mobility devices, which were related to high profit margins and fraudulent activity. Medicare responded with policy and program changes, and stakeholders in wheelchair service delivery have noticed an impact on their services and changes in wheelchair user access to needed equipment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined 4,252 wheelchair clinical recommendations made by full-time wheelchair seating department therapists between 2007 and 2017 through a retrospective chart review. Demographic counts and percentages were examined in relationship with equipment over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of recommendations increased over time in all age groups, but most for people aged 19-64. Fifty percent of people with Medicare were younger than 65, and 63% of Medicare recommendations were for complex wheelchair bases. Overall, decreased recommendations were noted in 2008, consistent with the economic recession. An increase in recommendations occurred from 2014 to 2017, consistent with the onset of the Affordable Care Act.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most change occurred for middle and older age groups, complex manual wheelchairs, and standard power mobility devices. This study supports the need for a separate Medicare category of Complex Rehabilitation Technology for those with severe disabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":282300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"264-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10400435.2020.1772899\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2020.1772899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2020.1772899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:在21世纪初,联邦政府的调查人员注意到,医疗保险在电力移动设备上的支出不断增长,这与高利润率和欺诈活动有关。医疗保险以政策和项目变化作为回应,轮椅服务提供的利益相关者已经注意到他们的服务受到影响,轮椅使用者获得所需设备的机会也发生了变化。方法:本研究通过回顾性图表回顾,对2007年至2017年期间全职轮椅坐位科治疗师提出的4252项轮椅临床建议进行了调查。随着时间的推移,研究了人口统计计数和百分比与设备的关系。结果:随着时间的推移,所有年龄组的推荐数量都在增加,但大多数是针对19-64岁的人群。50%的医疗保险受益人年龄在65岁以下,63%的医疗保险建议是复杂的轮椅基地。总体而言,2008年的建议减少,与经济衰退一致。从2014年到2017年,建议的数量有所增加,这与《平价医疗法案》的实施一致。结论:大多数变化发生在中老年人群、复杂的手动轮椅和标准的动力移动装置中。这项研究支持需要一个单独的医疗保险类别的复杂康复技术为那些严重残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in wheelchair recommendations in a dedicated seating department.

Introduction: In the early 2000 s, investigators at the federal government noted growing Medicare expenditures for power mobility devices, which were related to high profit margins and fraudulent activity. Medicare responded with policy and program changes, and stakeholders in wheelchair service delivery have noticed an impact on their services and changes in wheelchair user access to needed equipment.

Methods: This study examined 4,252 wheelchair clinical recommendations made by full-time wheelchair seating department therapists between 2007 and 2017 through a retrospective chart review. Demographic counts and percentages were examined in relationship with equipment over time.

Results: The number of recommendations increased over time in all age groups, but most for people aged 19-64. Fifty percent of people with Medicare were younger than 65, and 63% of Medicare recommendations were for complex wheelchair bases. Overall, decreased recommendations were noted in 2008, consistent with the economic recession. An increase in recommendations occurred from 2014 to 2017, consistent with the onset of the Affordable Care Act.

Conclusions: Most change occurred for middle and older age groups, complex manual wheelchairs, and standard power mobility devices. This study supports the need for a separate Medicare category of Complex Rehabilitation Technology for those with severe disabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信