即刻通知:社区咨询委员会对生物样本库沟通的看法,以补充广泛同意。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Public Health Genomics Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-12 DOI:10.1159/000507057
Karen M Meagher, Susan H Curtis, Kylie O Gamm, Erica J Sutton, Jennifer B McCormick, Richard R Sharp
{"title":"即刻通知:社区咨询委员会对生物样本库沟通的看法,以补充广泛同意。","authors":"Karen M Meagher,&nbsp;Susan H Curtis,&nbsp;Kylie O Gamm,&nbsp;Erica J Sutton,&nbsp;Jennifer B McCormick,&nbsp;Richard R Sharp","doi":"10.1159/000507057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To address ethical concerns about the of future research authorization, biobanks employing a broad model of consent can design ongoing communication with contributors. Notifying contributors at the time of sample distribution provides one form of communication to supplement broad consent. However, little is known about how community-informed governance might anticipate contributor responses and inform communication efforts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We explored the attitudes of members of a three-site Community Advisory Board (CAB) network. CAB members responded to a hypothetical proposal for notifying biobank contributors at the time of sample distribution to researchers utilizing the biobank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used regularly scheduled CAB meetings to facilitate 3 large-group and 6 small-group discussions. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content using descriptive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results challenged our expectation of general support for the proposed communications. While CAB members identified some advantages, they were concerned about several potential harms to biobank contributors and the biobank. The CABs understood biobank communication in terms of an ongoing relationship with the biobank and a personal contribution to research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings contribute to the emerging literature on community engagement in biobanking. Additional communication with biobank contributors can serve a variety of value-based objectives to supplement broad consent. Design of communication efforts by biobanks can be improved by CAB members' anticipation of the unintended consequences of additional contact with contributors. CAB members' holistic interpretation of communication efforts suggests that biobank leadership considers all communication options as part of a more comprehensive communications strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":"23 3-4","pages":"77-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000507057","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"At a Moment's Notice: Community Advisory Board Perspectives on Biobank Communication to Supplement Broad Consent.\",\"authors\":\"Karen M Meagher,&nbsp;Susan H Curtis,&nbsp;Kylie O Gamm,&nbsp;Erica J Sutton,&nbsp;Jennifer B McCormick,&nbsp;Richard R Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000507057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To address ethical concerns about the of future research authorization, biobanks employing a broad model of consent can design ongoing communication with contributors. Notifying contributors at the time of sample distribution provides one form of communication to supplement broad consent. However, little is known about how community-informed governance might anticipate contributor responses and inform communication efforts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We explored the attitudes of members of a three-site Community Advisory Board (CAB) network. CAB members responded to a hypothetical proposal for notifying biobank contributors at the time of sample distribution to researchers utilizing the biobank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used regularly scheduled CAB meetings to facilitate 3 large-group and 6 small-group discussions. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content using descriptive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results challenged our expectation of general support for the proposed communications. While CAB members identified some advantages, they were concerned about several potential harms to biobank contributors and the biobank. The CABs understood biobank communication in terms of an ongoing relationship with the biobank and a personal contribution to research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings contribute to the emerging literature on community engagement in biobanking. Additional communication with biobank contributors can serve a variety of value-based objectives to supplement broad consent. Design of communication efforts by biobanks can be improved by CAB members' anticipation of the unintended consequences of additional contact with contributors. CAB members' holistic interpretation of communication efforts suggests that biobank leadership considers all communication options as part of a more comprehensive communications strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"volume\":\"23 3-4\",\"pages\":\"77-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000507057\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000507057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/5/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000507057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

导论:为了解决关于未来研究授权的伦理问题,生物银行采用广泛的同意模型可以设计与贡献者的持续沟通。在分发样本时通知贡献者提供了一种补充广泛同意的沟通形式。然而,关于社区知情治理如何预测贡献者的反应并通知沟通工作,我们知之甚少。目的:探讨三站点社区咨询委员会(CAB)网络成员的态度。CAB成员回应了一项假设的建议,即在样本分发给利用生物库的研究人员时通知生物库贡献者。方法:我们定期召开CAB会议,促进3个大小组和6个小小组的讨论。讨论被录音、转录,并使用描述性主题分析对主题内容进行分析。结果:结果挑战了我们对所提议的通信普遍支持的期望。虽然CAB成员确定了一些优势,但他们担心对生物库贡献者和生物库的一些潜在危害。cab从与生物库的持续关系和个人对研究的贡献方面理解生物库的沟通。结论:我们的研究结果为社区参与生物银行的新兴文献做出了贡献。与生物库贡献者的额外沟通可以服务于各种基于价值的目标,以补充广泛的同意。生物库沟通工作的设计可以通过CAB成员对与贡献者额外接触的意外后果的预期来改进。CAB成员对沟通努力的整体解读表明,生物银行领导层将所有沟通选择视为更全面的沟通战略的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
At a Moment's Notice: Community Advisory Board Perspectives on Biobank Communication to Supplement Broad Consent.

Introduction: To address ethical concerns about the of future research authorization, biobanks employing a broad model of consent can design ongoing communication with contributors. Notifying contributors at the time of sample distribution provides one form of communication to supplement broad consent. However, little is known about how community-informed governance might anticipate contributor responses and inform communication efforts.

Objective: We explored the attitudes of members of a three-site Community Advisory Board (CAB) network. CAB members responded to a hypothetical proposal for notifying biobank contributors at the time of sample distribution to researchers utilizing the biobank.

Methods: We used regularly scheduled CAB meetings to facilitate 3 large-group and 6 small-group discussions. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content using descriptive thematic analysis.

Results: The results challenged our expectation of general support for the proposed communications. While CAB members identified some advantages, they were concerned about several potential harms to biobank contributors and the biobank. The CABs understood biobank communication in terms of an ongoing relationship with the biobank and a personal contribution to research.

Conclusion: Our findings contribute to the emerging literature on community engagement in biobanking. Additional communication with biobank contributors can serve a variety of value-based objectives to supplement broad consent. Design of communication efforts by biobanks can be improved by CAB members' anticipation of the unintended consequences of additional contact with contributors. CAB members' holistic interpretation of communication efforts suggests that biobank leadership considers all communication options as part of a more comprehensive communications strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信