调整实践数据和机构特定CPD:医疗质量管理作为电子学习发展过程的驱动力。

Journal of European CME Pub Date : 2020-04-23 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120
Douglas Archibald, Joseph K Burns, Michael Fitzgerald, Véronique French Merkley
{"title":"调整实践数据和机构特定CPD:医疗质量管理作为电子学习发展过程的驱动力。","authors":"Douglas Archibald,&nbsp;Joseph K Burns,&nbsp;Michael Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Véronique French Merkley","doi":"10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For hospital physicians, alignment of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) with quality improvement efforts is often absent or rudimentary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a CPD development process that created accessible learning opportunities and aligned CPD with practice data. We conducted a chart audit to identify patient safety and quality of care issues within the institution, then established an eLearning approach that supported quick and cost effective development of high-quality interactive CPD opportunities. We tested a pilot module on the management of common infections in sub-acute care settings with fifteen (68%) residents and three staff physicians to evaluate the approach. One resident and three staff agreed to a follow-up interview. The satisfaction survey indicated that participants felt the content was generally appropriate and the module well designed. Significant improvements to knowledge were reported in the multi-drug resistance (Mean Difference = 25%, p = 0.002), infection management (MD = 32%, p < 0.001), and cellulitis risk factor (MD = 22%, p = 0.02) questions, as well as in the overall score (MD = 19%, p < 0.001). In terms of confidence in their answers, the mean rating pre-module was 3.17, rising significantly to 3.92 post-module (p < 0.001). In this way, collaboration between quality management and education committees allowed for the development of relevant CPD for physicians, with eLearning providing a timely and accessible way to deliver training on emerging issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":87300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European CME","volume":"9 1","pages":"1754120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas Archibald,&nbsp;Joseph K Burns,&nbsp;Michael Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Véronique French Merkley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For hospital physicians, alignment of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) with quality improvement efforts is often absent or rudimentary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a CPD development process that created accessible learning opportunities and aligned CPD with practice data. We conducted a chart audit to identify patient safety and quality of care issues within the institution, then established an eLearning approach that supported quick and cost effective development of high-quality interactive CPD opportunities. We tested a pilot module on the management of common infections in sub-acute care settings with fifteen (68%) residents and three staff physicians to evaluate the approach. One resident and three staff agreed to a follow-up interview. The satisfaction survey indicated that participants felt the content was generally appropriate and the module well designed. Significant improvements to knowledge were reported in the multi-drug resistance (Mean Difference = 25%, p = 0.002), infection management (MD = 32%, p < 0.001), and cellulitis risk factor (MD = 22%, p = 0.02) questions, as well as in the overall score (MD = 19%, p < 0.001). In terms of confidence in their answers, the mean rating pre-module was 3.17, rising significantly to 3.92 post-module (p < 0.001). In this way, collaboration between quality management and education committees allowed for the development of relevant CPD for physicians, with eLearning providing a timely and accessible way to deliver training on emerging issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European CME\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1754120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European CME\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1754120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对于医院医生来说,持续专业发展(CPD)与质量改进工作的一致性通常是缺失的或基本的。本研究的目的是评估CPD发展过程,该过程创造了可访问的学习机会,并使CPD与实践数据保持一致。我们进行了图表审核,以确定机构内的患者安全和护理质量问题,然后建立了一个电子学习方法,支持快速和经济有效地开发高质量的交互式持续专业发展机会。我们测试了一个关于亚急性护理环境中常见感染管理的试点模块,有15名(68%)住院医生和3名主治医生来评估该方法。一名住院医生和三名工作人员同意接受后续采访。满意度调查显示,参与者认为课程内容大致合适,课程模块设计良好。多药耐药知识(Mean Difference = 25%, p = 0.002)和感染管理知识(MD = 32%, p = 0.002)均有显著提高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.

Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.

Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.

Aligning Practice Data and Institution-specific CPD: Medical Quality Management as the Driver for an eLearning Development Process.

For hospital physicians, alignment of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) with quality improvement efforts is often absent or rudimentary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a CPD development process that created accessible learning opportunities and aligned CPD with practice data. We conducted a chart audit to identify patient safety and quality of care issues within the institution, then established an eLearning approach that supported quick and cost effective development of high-quality interactive CPD opportunities. We tested a pilot module on the management of common infections in sub-acute care settings with fifteen (68%) residents and three staff physicians to evaluate the approach. One resident and three staff agreed to a follow-up interview. The satisfaction survey indicated that participants felt the content was generally appropriate and the module well designed. Significant improvements to knowledge were reported in the multi-drug resistance (Mean Difference = 25%, p = 0.002), infection management (MD = 32%, p < 0.001), and cellulitis risk factor (MD = 22%, p = 0.02) questions, as well as in the overall score (MD = 19%, p < 0.001). In terms of confidence in their answers, the mean rating pre-module was 3.17, rising significantly to 3.92 post-module (p < 0.001). In this way, collaboration between quality management and education committees allowed for the development of relevant CPD for physicians, with eLearning providing a timely and accessible way to deliver training on emerging issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信