Lynn Robertson, Dolapo Ayansina, Marjorie Johnston, Angharad Marks, Corri Black
{"title":"城乡差别和社会经济地位:对住院病人多病患病率的影响。","authors":"Lynn Robertson, Dolapo Ayansina, Marjorie Johnston, Angharad Marks, Corri Black","doi":"10.1177/2235042X19893470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe multimorbidity prevalence in hospitalized adults, by urban-rural area of residence and socioeconomic status (SES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Linked hospital episode data were used. Adults (≥18 years) admitted to hospital as an inpatient during 2014 in Grampian, Scotland, were included. Conditions were identified from admissions during the 5 years prior to the first admission in 2014. Multimorbidity was defined as ≥2 conditions and measured using Tonelli et al. based on International Classification of Diseases-10 coding (preselected list of 30 conditions). We used proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to summarize the prevalence of multimorbidity by age group, sex, urban-rural category and deprivation. The association between multimorbidity and patient characteristics was assessed using the <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty one thousand five hundred and forty-five patients were included (median age 62, 52.6% female). Overall, 27.4% (95% CI 27.0, 27.8) of patients were multimorbid. Multimorbidity prevalence was 28.8% (95% CI 28.1, 29.5) in large urban versus 22.0% (95% CI 20.9, 23.3) in remote rural areas and 28.7% (95% CI 27.2, 30.3) in the most deprived versus 26.0% (95% CI 25.2, 26.9) in the least deprived areas. This effect was consistent in all age groups, but not statistically significant in the age group 18-29 years. Multimorbidity increased with age but was similar for males and females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the scarcity of research into the effect of urban-rural area and SES on multimorbidity prevalence among hospitalized patients, these findings should inform future research into new models of care, including the consideration of urban-rural area and SES.</p>","PeriodicalId":92071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comorbidity","volume":"10 ","pages":"2235042X19893470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ea/06/10.1177_2235042X19893470.PMC7171988.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban-rural and socioeconomic status: Impact on multimorbidity prevalence in hospitalized patients.\",\"authors\":\"Lynn Robertson, Dolapo Ayansina, Marjorie Johnston, Angharad Marks, Corri Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2235042X19893470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe multimorbidity prevalence in hospitalized adults, by urban-rural area of residence and socioeconomic status (SES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Linked hospital episode data were used. Adults (≥18 years) admitted to hospital as an inpatient during 2014 in Grampian, Scotland, were included. Conditions were identified from admissions during the 5 years prior to the first admission in 2014. Multimorbidity was defined as ≥2 conditions and measured using Tonelli et al. based on International Classification of Diseases-10 coding (preselected list of 30 conditions). We used proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to summarize the prevalence of multimorbidity by age group, sex, urban-rural category and deprivation. The association between multimorbidity and patient characteristics was assessed using the <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty one thousand five hundred and forty-five patients were included (median age 62, 52.6% female). Overall, 27.4% (95% CI 27.0, 27.8) of patients were multimorbid. Multimorbidity prevalence was 28.8% (95% CI 28.1, 29.5) in large urban versus 22.0% (95% CI 20.9, 23.3) in remote rural areas and 28.7% (95% CI 27.2, 30.3) in the most deprived versus 26.0% (95% CI 25.2, 26.9) in the least deprived areas. This effect was consistent in all age groups, but not statistically significant in the age group 18-29 years. Multimorbidity increased with age but was similar for males and females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the scarcity of research into the effect of urban-rural area and SES on multimorbidity prevalence among hospitalized patients, these findings should inform future research into new models of care, including the consideration of urban-rural area and SES.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"2235042X19893470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ea/06/10.1177_2235042X19893470.PMC7171988.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X19893470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X19893470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究旨在按居住地的城乡区域和社会经济地位(SES)描述住院成年人的多病症患病率:方法:使用关联的住院病程数据。研究纳入了苏格兰格兰披恩地区 2014 年住院的成年人(≥18 岁)。根据 2014 年首次入院前 5 年的入院情况确定病情。多病症的定义是病症≥2种,并根据《国际疾病分类-10》(International Classification of Diseases-10)编码(预选的30种病症列表)采用Tonelli等人的方法进行测量。我们使用比例和 95% 置信区间 (CIs) 来概括按年龄组、性别、城乡类别和贫困程度划分的多病症患病率。多重疾病与患者特征之间的关系采用χ 2检验进行评估:共纳入 41545 名患者(中位年龄 62 岁,52.6% 为女性)。总体而言,27.4%(95% CI 27.0,27.8)的患者患有多种疾病。大城市的多病症患病率为 28.8%(95% CI 28.1,29.5),而偏远农村地区为 22.0%(95% CI 20.9,23.3);最贫困地区的多病症患病率为 28.7%(95% CI 27.2,30.3),而最不贫困地区为 26.0%(95% CI 25.2,26.9)。这一影响在所有年龄组中都是一致的,但在 18-29 岁年龄组中没有统计学意义。多病率随年龄增长而增加,但男性和女性的多病率相似:鉴于有关城乡地区和社会经济地位对住院病人多病患病率影响的研究很少,这些研究结果应为未来的新护理模式研究提供参考,包括考虑城乡地区和社会经济地位。
Urban-rural and socioeconomic status: Impact on multimorbidity prevalence in hospitalized patients.
Objective: The aim of this study was to describe multimorbidity prevalence in hospitalized adults, by urban-rural area of residence and socioeconomic status (SES).
Methods: Linked hospital episode data were used. Adults (≥18 years) admitted to hospital as an inpatient during 2014 in Grampian, Scotland, were included. Conditions were identified from admissions during the 5 years prior to the first admission in 2014. Multimorbidity was defined as ≥2 conditions and measured using Tonelli et al. based on International Classification of Diseases-10 coding (preselected list of 30 conditions). We used proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to summarize the prevalence of multimorbidity by age group, sex, urban-rural category and deprivation. The association between multimorbidity and patient characteristics was assessed using the χ2 test.
Results: Forty one thousand five hundred and forty-five patients were included (median age 62, 52.6% female). Overall, 27.4% (95% CI 27.0, 27.8) of patients were multimorbid. Multimorbidity prevalence was 28.8% (95% CI 28.1, 29.5) in large urban versus 22.0% (95% CI 20.9, 23.3) in remote rural areas and 28.7% (95% CI 27.2, 30.3) in the most deprived versus 26.0% (95% CI 25.2, 26.9) in the least deprived areas. This effect was consistent in all age groups, but not statistically significant in the age group 18-29 years. Multimorbidity increased with age but was similar for males and females.
Conclusion: Given the scarcity of research into the effect of urban-rural area and SES on multimorbidity prevalence among hospitalized patients, these findings should inform future research into new models of care, including the consideration of urban-rural area and SES.