不孕妇女焦虑症状的流行情况:系统综述和荟萃分析。

Fertility research and practice Pub Date : 2020-04-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40738-020-00076-1
Zahra Kiani, Masoumeh Simbar, Sepideh Hajian, Farid Zayeri, Maryam Shahidi, Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz, Vida Ghasemi
{"title":"不孕妇女焦虑症状的流行情况:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Zahra Kiani, Masoumeh Simbar, Sepideh Hajian, Farid Zayeri, Maryam Shahidi, Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz, Vida Ghasemi","doi":"10.1186/s40738-020-00076-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertile women are exposed more frequently to anxiety risk than are infertile men, thereby adversely affecting the procedures with which they are treated and the quality of their lives. Yet, this problem is often disregarded. This study accordingly determined the prevalence of anxiety symptoms among infertile women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All Persian and English studies published from the early 2000s to May 2019 were searched in international (i.e., PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and PsycINFO) and national (i.e., SID, Magiran) databases as well as through Google Scholar. After the titles and abstracts of the articles were reviewed, their quality was evaluated, and relevant works for examination were selected in consideration of established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of biases of individual studies according to Newcastle - Ottawa Scale was assessed. The heterogeneity of the studies was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and indicators of publication bias were ascertained using Egger's test. Stata (version 14) was employed in analyzing the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies having a collective sample size of 5055 infertile women were subjected to meta-analysis, with study heterogeneity incorporated into a random effects model. The findings indicated that 36% of the infertile women involved in the evaluated studies self-reported their experience with anxiety. The pooled prevalence of the condition among the subjects was 36.17% [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.47-49.87]. The pooled prevalence levels in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries were 54.24% (95% CI: 31.86-78.62) and 25.05% (95% CI: 15.76-34.34), respectively. The results revealed no evidence of publication bias (P <sub>Egger's test</sub> = 0.406).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the prevalence of anxiety in infertile women and its effects on health processes and quality of life, this problem requires serious consideration and planning for effective intervention, especially in low- and middle-income nations.</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"6 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7157980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prevalence of anxiety symptoms in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Kiani, Masoumeh Simbar, Sepideh Hajian, Farid Zayeri, Maryam Shahidi, Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz, Vida Ghasemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40738-020-00076-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertile women are exposed more frequently to anxiety risk than are infertile men, thereby adversely affecting the procedures with which they are treated and the quality of their lives. Yet, this problem is often disregarded. This study accordingly determined the prevalence of anxiety symptoms among infertile women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All Persian and English studies published from the early 2000s to May 2019 were searched in international (i.e., PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and PsycINFO) and national (i.e., SID, Magiran) databases as well as through Google Scholar. After the titles and abstracts of the articles were reviewed, their quality was evaluated, and relevant works for examination were selected in consideration of established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of biases of individual studies according to Newcastle - Ottawa Scale was assessed. The heterogeneity of the studies was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and indicators of publication bias were ascertained using Egger's test. Stata (version 14) was employed in analyzing the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies having a collective sample size of 5055 infertile women were subjected to meta-analysis, with study heterogeneity incorporated into a random effects model. The findings indicated that 36% of the infertile women involved in the evaluated studies self-reported their experience with anxiety. The pooled prevalence of the condition among the subjects was 36.17% [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.47-49.87]. The pooled prevalence levels in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries were 54.24% (95% CI: 31.86-78.62) and 25.05% (95% CI: 15.76-34.34), respectively. The results revealed no evidence of publication bias (P <sub>Egger's test</sub> = 0.406).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the prevalence of anxiety in infertile women and its effects on health processes and quality of life, this problem requires serious consideration and planning for effective intervention, especially in low- and middle-income nations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7157980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00076-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00076-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与男性不育症患者相比,女性不育症患者面临更多的焦虑风险,从而对她们的治疗程序和生活质量造成不利影响。然而,这一问题往往被忽视。本研究据此确定了不孕妇女中焦虑症状的发生率:在国际(即 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase 和 PsycINFO)和国内(即 SID、Magiran)数据库以及通过谷歌学术搜索了 2000 年代初至 2019 年 5 月期间发表的所有波斯语和英语研究。在审阅了文章的标题和摘要后,对其质量进行了评估,并根据既定的纳入和排除标准选择了相关作品进行研究。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估了各项研究的偏倚风险。使用 I2 统计量评估研究的异质性,并使用 Egger 检验确定发表偏倚指标。分析结果采用 Stata(14 版):对样本量为 5055 名不孕妇女的 13 项研究进行了荟萃分析,并将研究异质性纳入随机效应模型。结果表明,在参与评估的研究中,有 36% 的不孕妇女自述有过焦虑经历。受试者中该症状的总患病率为 36.17%[95% 置信区间 (CI):22.47-49.87]。中低收入国家和高收入国家的总体患病率分别为 54.24% (95% CI: 31.86-78.62) 和 25.05% (95% CI: 15.76-34.34)。结果显示没有证据表明存在发表偏倚(P Egger's test = 0.406):考虑到焦虑症在不孕妇女中的普遍性及其对健康过程和生活质量的影响,这一问题需要认真考虑并计划采取有效的干预措施,尤其是在中低收入国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The prevalence of anxiety symptoms in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The prevalence of anxiety symptoms in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The prevalence of anxiety symptoms in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The prevalence of anxiety symptoms in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Infertile women are exposed more frequently to anxiety risk than are infertile men, thereby adversely affecting the procedures with which they are treated and the quality of their lives. Yet, this problem is often disregarded. This study accordingly determined the prevalence of anxiety symptoms among infertile women.

Methods: All Persian and English studies published from the early 2000s to May 2019 were searched in international (i.e., PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and PsycINFO) and national (i.e., SID, Magiran) databases as well as through Google Scholar. After the titles and abstracts of the articles were reviewed, their quality was evaluated, and relevant works for examination were selected in consideration of established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of biases of individual studies according to Newcastle - Ottawa Scale was assessed. The heterogeneity of the studies was assessed using the I2 statistic, and indicators of publication bias were ascertained using Egger's test. Stata (version 14) was employed in analyzing the findings.

Results: Thirteen studies having a collective sample size of 5055 infertile women were subjected to meta-analysis, with study heterogeneity incorporated into a random effects model. The findings indicated that 36% of the infertile women involved in the evaluated studies self-reported their experience with anxiety. The pooled prevalence of the condition among the subjects was 36.17% [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.47-49.87]. The pooled prevalence levels in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries were 54.24% (95% CI: 31.86-78.62) and 25.05% (95% CI: 15.76-34.34), respectively. The results revealed no evidence of publication bias (P Egger's test = 0.406).

Conclusion: Considering the prevalence of anxiety in infertile women and its effects on health processes and quality of life, this problem requires serious consideration and planning for effective intervention, especially in low- and middle-income nations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信