Joung Woo Son, Jae-Wook Ryu, Pil Won Seo, Kyoung Min Ryu, Sung Wook Chang
{"title":"动静脉移植物治疗不适宜头静脉进行血液透析的终末期肾病患者的临床效果。","authors":"Joung Woo Son, Jae-Wook Ryu, Pil Won Seo, Kyoung Min Ryu, Sung Wook Chang","doi":"10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.2.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the population of patients with end-stage renal disease has grown older, the proportion of patients with poorly preserved vasculature has concomitantly increased. Thus, arteriovenous grafts (AVG) have been used more frequently to access blood vessels for hemodialysis. Despite this increasing demand, studies of AVG are limited. In this study, we examined the surgical outcomes of upper-limb AVG creation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among the arteriovenous fistula formation procedures performed between January 2014 and March 2019 at Dankook University Hospital, 42 cases involved AVG creation. We compared patients in whom the axillary vein was used (group A; brachioaxillary AVG [B-Ax AVG]; n=20) with those in whom upper limb veins were used (group B; brachiobasilic AVG or brachioantecubital AVG; n=22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1-year primary patency rate was higher in group A than in group B (57.9% vs. 41.7%; p=0.262). The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVG using the axillary vein showed no major differences in safety or functionality compared to AVG using other veins. Therefore, accounting for age, underlying disease, and expected patient lifespan, B-Ax AVG can be considered an acceptable surgical method.</p>","PeriodicalId":38678,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"53 2","pages":"73-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/e1/kjtcv-53-073.PMC7155179.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of Arteriovenous Graft in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients with an Unsuitable Cephalic Vein for Hemodialysis Access.\",\"authors\":\"Joung Woo Son, Jae-Wook Ryu, Pil Won Seo, Kyoung Min Ryu, Sung Wook Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.2.73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the population of patients with end-stage renal disease has grown older, the proportion of patients with poorly preserved vasculature has concomitantly increased. Thus, arteriovenous grafts (AVG) have been used more frequently to access blood vessels for hemodialysis. Despite this increasing demand, studies of AVG are limited. In this study, we examined the surgical outcomes of upper-limb AVG creation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among the arteriovenous fistula formation procedures performed between January 2014 and March 2019 at Dankook University Hospital, 42 cases involved AVG creation. We compared patients in whom the axillary vein was used (group A; brachioaxillary AVG [B-Ax AVG]; n=20) with those in whom upper limb veins were used (group B; brachiobasilic AVG or brachioantecubital AVG; n=22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1-year primary patency rate was higher in group A than in group B (57.9% vs. 41.7%; p=0.262). The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVG using the axillary vein showed no major differences in safety or functionality compared to AVG using other veins. Therefore, accounting for age, underlying disease, and expected patient lifespan, B-Ax AVG can be considered an acceptable surgical method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"73-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/e1/kjtcv-53-073.PMC7155179.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.2.73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.2.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:随着终末期肾病患者年龄的增长,血管保存不良的患者比例也随之增加。因此,动静脉移植物(AVG)已被更频繁地用于进入血管进行血液透析。尽管需求不断增加,但对AVG的研究仍然有限。在这项研究中,我们检查了上肢AVG的手术结果。方法:2014年1月至2019年3月在檀国大学医院进行的动静脉瘘形成手术中,42例涉及AVG形成。我们比较了使用腋窝静脉的患者(A组;臂腋AVG [B-Ax AVG];n=20),上肢静脉组(B组;肱基础AVG或肱前AVG;n = 22)。结果:A组1年原发性通畅率高于B组(57.9% vs 41.7%;p = 0.262)。两组术后并发症发生率无明显差异。结论:采用腋静脉的AVG与采用其他静脉的AVG在安全性和功能上无显著差异。因此,考虑到年龄、潜在疾病和预期患者寿命,B-Ax AVG可以被认为是一种可接受的手术方法。
Clinical Outcomes of Arteriovenous Graft in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients with an Unsuitable Cephalic Vein for Hemodialysis Access.
Background: As the population of patients with end-stage renal disease has grown older, the proportion of patients with poorly preserved vasculature has concomitantly increased. Thus, arteriovenous grafts (AVG) have been used more frequently to access blood vessels for hemodialysis. Despite this increasing demand, studies of AVG are limited. In this study, we examined the surgical outcomes of upper-limb AVG creation.
Methods: Among the arteriovenous fistula formation procedures performed between January 2014 and March 2019 at Dankook University Hospital, 42 cases involved AVG creation. We compared patients in whom the axillary vein was used (group A; brachioaxillary AVG [B-Ax AVG]; n=20) with those in whom upper limb veins were used (group B; brachiobasilic AVG or brachioantecubital AVG; n=22).
Results: The 1-year primary patency rate was higher in group A than in group B (57.9% vs. 41.7%; p=0.262). The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different between groups.
Conclusion: AVG using the axillary vein showed no major differences in safety or functionality compared to AVG using other veins. Therefore, accounting for age, underlying disease, and expected patient lifespan, B-Ax AVG can be considered an acceptable surgical method.