人类疫苗效力测试的非动物替代方法:科学现状和未来方向

Richard McFarland , Daniela Verthelyi , Warren Casey , Juan Arciniega , Richard Isbrucker , Michael Schmitt , Theresa Finn , Johan Descamps , Yoshinobu Horiuchi , Dorothea Sesardic , Paul Stickings , Nelson W Johnson , Elizabeth Lipscomb , David Allen
{"title":"人类疫苗效力测试的非动物替代方法:科学现状和未来方向","authors":"Richard McFarland ,&nbsp;Daniela Verthelyi ,&nbsp;Warren Casey ,&nbsp;Juan Arciniega ,&nbsp;Richard Isbrucker ,&nbsp;Michael Schmitt ,&nbsp;Theresa Finn ,&nbsp;Johan Descamps ,&nbsp;Yoshinobu Horiuchi ,&nbsp;Dorothea Sesardic ,&nbsp;Paul Stickings ,&nbsp;Nelson W Johnson ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lipscomb ,&nbsp;David Allen","doi":"10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>NICEATM and ICCVAM convened an international workshop to review the state of the science of human and veterinary vaccine potency and safety testing methods, and to identify opportunities to advance new and improved methods that can further reduce, refine, and replace animal use. This report addresses methods and strategies identified by workshop participants for replacement of animals used for potency testing of human vaccines. Vaccines considered to have the highest priority for future efforts were (1) vaccines for which antigen quantification methods are already developed but not validated, (2) vaccines/components that require the largest number of animals, (3) vaccines that require an in vivo challenge test, and (4) vaccines with in vivo tests that are highly variable and cause a significant number of invalid tests. Vaccine potency tests identified as the highest priorities for replacement were those for diphtheria and tetanus, pertussis (whole cell and acellular), rabies, anthrax, polio vaccine (inactivated) and complex combination vaccines based on DT or DTwP/aP. Research into understanding the precise mechanism of protection afforded by vaccines and the identification of clinically relevant immunological markers are needed to facilitate the successful implementation of in vitro testing alternatives. This report also identifies several priority human vaccines and associated research objectives that are necessary to successfully implement in vitro vaccine potency testing alternatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89221,"journal":{"name":"Procedia in vaccinology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 16-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.002","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Richard McFarland ,&nbsp;Daniela Verthelyi ,&nbsp;Warren Casey ,&nbsp;Juan Arciniega ,&nbsp;Richard Isbrucker ,&nbsp;Michael Schmitt ,&nbsp;Theresa Finn ,&nbsp;Johan Descamps ,&nbsp;Yoshinobu Horiuchi ,&nbsp;Dorothea Sesardic ,&nbsp;Paul Stickings ,&nbsp;Nelson W Johnson ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lipscomb ,&nbsp;David Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>NICEATM and ICCVAM convened an international workshop to review the state of the science of human and veterinary vaccine potency and safety testing methods, and to identify opportunities to advance new and improved methods that can further reduce, refine, and replace animal use. This report addresses methods and strategies identified by workshop participants for replacement of animals used for potency testing of human vaccines. Vaccines considered to have the highest priority for future efforts were (1) vaccines for which antigen quantification methods are already developed but not validated, (2) vaccines/components that require the largest number of animals, (3) vaccines that require an in vivo challenge test, and (4) vaccines with in vivo tests that are highly variable and cause a significant number of invalid tests. Vaccine potency tests identified as the highest priorities for replacement were those for diphtheria and tetanus, pertussis (whole cell and acellular), rabies, anthrax, polio vaccine (inactivated) and complex combination vaccines based on DT or DTwP/aP. Research into understanding the precise mechanism of protection afforded by vaccines and the identification of clinically relevant immunological markers are needed to facilitate the successful implementation of in vitro testing alternatives. This report also identifies several priority human vaccines and associated research objectives that are necessary to successfully implement in vitro vaccine potency testing alternatives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Procedia in vaccinology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.002\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Procedia in vaccinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877282X11000208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia in vaccinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877282X11000208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

NICEATM和ICCVAM召开了一次国际讲习班,审查人用和兽用疫苗效力和安全性测试方法的科学现状,并确定推进可进一步减少、改进和取代动物使用的新改进方法的机会。本报告涉及讲习班参与者确定的替代用于人疫苗效力试验的动物的方法和战略。被认为在未来工作中具有最高优先级的疫苗是(1)抗原定量方法已经开发但尚未验证的疫苗,(2)需要大量动物的疫苗/成分,(3)需要进行体内攻击试验的疫苗,以及(4)体内试验高度可变且导致大量无效试验的疫苗。确定为最优先替代的疫苗效力试验是针对白喉和破伤风、百日咳(全细胞和非细胞)、狂犬病、炭疽、脊髓灰质炎疫苗(灭活疫苗)和基于白喉或白喉/白喉复合疫苗的复杂联合疫苗的效力试验。需要进行研究,了解疫苗提供保护的确切机制,并确定临床相关的免疫学标志物,以促进成功实施体外测试替代方案。本报告还确定了成功实施体外疫苗效力测试替代方法所必需的若干重点人用疫苗和相关研究目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions

NICEATM and ICCVAM convened an international workshop to review the state of the science of human and veterinary vaccine potency and safety testing methods, and to identify opportunities to advance new and improved methods that can further reduce, refine, and replace animal use. This report addresses methods and strategies identified by workshop participants for replacement of animals used for potency testing of human vaccines. Vaccines considered to have the highest priority for future efforts were (1) vaccines for which antigen quantification methods are already developed but not validated, (2) vaccines/components that require the largest number of animals, (3) vaccines that require an in vivo challenge test, and (4) vaccines with in vivo tests that are highly variable and cause a significant number of invalid tests. Vaccine potency tests identified as the highest priorities for replacement were those for diphtheria and tetanus, pertussis (whole cell and acellular), rabies, anthrax, polio vaccine (inactivated) and complex combination vaccines based on DT or DTwP/aP. Research into understanding the precise mechanism of protection afforded by vaccines and the identification of clinically relevant immunological markers are needed to facilitate the successful implementation of in vitro testing alternatives. This report also identifies several priority human vaccines and associated research objectives that are necessary to successfully implement in vitro vaccine potency testing alternatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信