高血压患者动态血压计与振荡血压监测的比较。

IF 1.5 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Integrated Blood Pressure Control Pub Date : 2020-03-30 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IBPC.S235228
Bodil Gade Hornstrup, Jeppe Bakkestrøm Rosenbæk, Jesper Nørgaard Bech
{"title":"高血压患者动态血压计与振荡血压监测的比较。","authors":"Bodil Gade Hornstrup,&nbsp;Jeppe Bakkestrøm Rosenbæk,&nbsp;Jesper Nørgaard Bech","doi":"10.2147/IBPC.S235228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Correct measurement of blood pressure (BP) is important for optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertension. The aim of this study was to compare a wrist-worn device using tonometric measurements of BP to a conventional device using oscillometric measurements of 24 h BP, diagnosing of hypertension, and non-dipping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-hundred patients in the Renal Outpatient Clinic had 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring performed with a tonometric device, BPro, and an oscillometric device, A&D, simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four-hour and daytime systolic BP was significantly lower using tonometric monitoring compared to oscillometric (7 and 6 mmHg, respectively, <i>p</i>< 0.001). In the population of patients diagnosed with hypertension, the tonometric device diagnosed 90% of patients with uncontrolled hypertension correctly (positive predictive value), whereas 49% of patients classified as normotensive were uncontrolled hypertensive (negative predictive value). The mean difference between relative nocturnal BP decrease between tonometric and oscillometric was 2±8% (<i>p</i>< 0.01), and 33% of patients classified as dippers were non-dippers (negative predictive value).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the BPro device for tonometric monitoring of BP and classification of hypertension and non-dipping in patients diagnosed with hypertension leads to misclassification of patients. Therefore, the BPro device is not suitable for clinical practice in hypertensive patients from a Renal Outpatient Clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":45299,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Blood Pressure Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/IBPC.S235228","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Ambulatory Tonometric and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hypertensive Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Bodil Gade Hornstrup,&nbsp;Jeppe Bakkestrøm Rosenbæk,&nbsp;Jesper Nørgaard Bech\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IBPC.S235228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Correct measurement of blood pressure (BP) is important for optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertension. The aim of this study was to compare a wrist-worn device using tonometric measurements of BP to a conventional device using oscillometric measurements of 24 h BP, diagnosing of hypertension, and non-dipping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One-hundred patients in the Renal Outpatient Clinic had 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring performed with a tonometric device, BPro, and an oscillometric device, A&D, simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four-hour and daytime systolic BP was significantly lower using tonometric monitoring compared to oscillometric (7 and 6 mmHg, respectively, <i>p</i>< 0.001). In the population of patients diagnosed with hypertension, the tonometric device diagnosed 90% of patients with uncontrolled hypertension correctly (positive predictive value), whereas 49% of patients classified as normotensive were uncontrolled hypertensive (negative predictive value). The mean difference between relative nocturnal BP decrease between tonometric and oscillometric was 2±8% (<i>p</i>< 0.01), and 33% of patients classified as dippers were non-dippers (negative predictive value).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the BPro device for tonometric monitoring of BP and classification of hypertension and non-dipping in patients diagnosed with hypertension leads to misclassification of patients. Therefore, the BPro device is not suitable for clinical practice in hypertensive patients from a Renal Outpatient Clinic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrated Blood Pressure Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/IBPC.S235228\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrated Blood Pressure Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IBPC.S235228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Blood Pressure Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IBPC.S235228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:正确测量血压对高血压患者的诊断和治疗具有重要意义。本研究的目的是比较一种腕戴式血压测量装置和一种常规装置,采用24小时血压的振荡测量、高血压诊断和非浸入。方法:100例肾科门诊患者同时使用血压计BPro和示波仪A&D进行24 h动态血压监测。结果:使用血压计监测24小时和白天收缩压明显低于振荡测量(分别为7和6 mmHg, p< 0.001)。在被诊断为高血压的患者人群中,血压计正确诊断出90%未控制的高血压患者(阳性预测值),而49%被归类为血压正常的患者为未控制的高血压(阴性预测值)。血压计与示波计夜间相对血压下降的平均差异为2±8% (p< 0.01), 33%的患者被归为倾斜者而非倾斜者(阴性预测值)。结论:在诊断为高血压的患者中,使用BPro血压计监测血压,并将其分为高血压和非高血压,会导致患者的误分。因此,BPro装置不适合用于肾门诊高血压患者的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Ambulatory Tonometric and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hypertensive Patients.

Comparison of Ambulatory Tonometric and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hypertensive Patients.

Comparison of Ambulatory Tonometric and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hypertensive Patients.

Aim: Correct measurement of blood pressure (BP) is important for optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertension. The aim of this study was to compare a wrist-worn device using tonometric measurements of BP to a conventional device using oscillometric measurements of 24 h BP, diagnosing of hypertension, and non-dipping.

Methods: One-hundred patients in the Renal Outpatient Clinic had 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring performed with a tonometric device, BPro, and an oscillometric device, A&D, simultaneously.

Results: Twenty-four-hour and daytime systolic BP was significantly lower using tonometric monitoring compared to oscillometric (7 and 6 mmHg, respectively, p< 0.001). In the population of patients diagnosed with hypertension, the tonometric device diagnosed 90% of patients with uncontrolled hypertension correctly (positive predictive value), whereas 49% of patients classified as normotensive were uncontrolled hypertensive (negative predictive value). The mean difference between relative nocturnal BP decrease between tonometric and oscillometric was 2±8% (p< 0.01), and 33% of patients classified as dippers were non-dippers (negative predictive value).

Conclusion: Using the BPro device for tonometric monitoring of BP and classification of hypertension and non-dipping in patients diagnosed with hypertension leads to misclassification of patients. Therefore, the BPro device is not suitable for clinical practice in hypertensive patients from a Renal Outpatient Clinic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrated Blood Pressure Control
Integrated Blood Pressure Control PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信