{"title":"在肿瘤首次人体试验中,什么是最适合目的的设计?: 3+3 vs.贝叶斯logistic回归模型。","authors":"Sun Young Yum","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Primary goals When designing a clinical trial, the goals must be clearly and specifically defined, and this should guide decision making on the details of the study. The goals of phase 1 oncology studies may include: 1) determine maximal tolerated dose (MTD), 2) provide recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), 3) describe/characterize dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), 4) expand understanding of the investigational product, e.g. pharmacokinetics, efficacy. These goals may be coupled with business/development timeline (e.g., as quickly as possible) and/or cost goals (with fewest possible subjects). For novel targets or mode of action, these many goals are further complicated by limited information about clinical efficacy and toxicity. The ethical dilemma regarding dose selection has evolved from being centered on limiting the number of patients who experience toxicity to also minimize underdosing of patients in need of treatment.","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/61/tcp-28-1.PMC7136082.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the optimal fit-for-purpose design in an oncology first-in-human trial?: 3+3 vs. Bayesian logistic regression model.\",\"authors\":\"Sun Young Yum\",\"doi\":\"10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Primary goals When designing a clinical trial, the goals must be clearly and specifically defined, and this should guide decision making on the details of the study. The goals of phase 1 oncology studies may include: 1) determine maximal tolerated dose (MTD), 2) provide recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), 3) describe/characterize dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), 4) expand understanding of the investigational product, e.g. pharmacokinetics, efficacy. These goals may be coupled with business/development timeline (e.g., as quickly as possible) and/or cost goals (with fewest possible subjects). For novel targets or mode of action, these many goals are further complicated by limited information about clinical efficacy and toxicity. The ethical dilemma regarding dose selection has evolved from being centered on limiting the number of patients who experience toxicity to also minimize underdosing of patients in need of treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/61/tcp-28-1.PMC7136082.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
What is the optimal fit-for-purpose design in an oncology first-in-human trial?: 3+3 vs. Bayesian logistic regression model.
Primary goals When designing a clinical trial, the goals must be clearly and specifically defined, and this should guide decision making on the details of the study. The goals of phase 1 oncology studies may include: 1) determine maximal tolerated dose (MTD), 2) provide recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), 3) describe/characterize dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), 4) expand understanding of the investigational product, e.g. pharmacokinetics, efficacy. These goals may be coupled with business/development timeline (e.g., as quickly as possible) and/or cost goals (with fewest possible subjects). For novel targets or mode of action, these many goals are further complicated by limited information about clinical efficacy and toxicity. The ethical dilemma regarding dose selection has evolved from being centered on limiting the number of patients who experience toxicity to also minimize underdosing of patients in need of treatment.
期刊介绍:
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology (Transl Clin Pharmacol, TCP) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (KSCPT). TCP is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of knowledge relating to all aspects of translational and clinical pharmacology. The categories for publication include pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug disposition, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics (PD), clinical trials and design issues, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, pharmacometrics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilence, and human pharmacology. Studies involving animal models, pharmacological characterization, and clinical trials are appropriate for consideration.