Sams Jaker, Amjad Burgan, Vineet Prakash, Alexander Birkinshaw, Kishan Moosai, Adam Jacques, David Fluck, Mark MacGregor, Otar Lazariashvili, Pankaj Sharma, Christopher H Fry, Thang S Han
{"title":"心肌灌注显像和超声心动图测量左室射血分数一致性的性别差异。","authors":"Sams Jaker, Amjad Burgan, Vineet Prakash, Alexander Birkinshaw, Kishan Moosai, Adam Jacques, David Fluck, Mark MacGregor, Otar Lazariashvili, Pankaj Sharma, Christopher H Fry, Thang S Han","doi":"10.1177/2048004020915393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is generally measured by echocardiography but is increasingly available with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. With myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, the threshold of LVEF below which there is a risk for myocardial infarct or sudden cardiac death is higher for women (51%) than for men (43%). We tested the hypothesis that such a sex difference may also occur with echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Methods Four hundred and four men, mean age = 67.7 ± SD = 12.3 yr; 339 women, 67.7 ± 11.7 yr had separate myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography examinations within six months. A subset of 327 of these patients (181 men, 68.8 ± 12.1 yr; 146 women, 66.4 ± 12.1 yr) had examinations within one month and were additionally analysed as this sub-group. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography were used to measure LVEF at rest and their agreement (neither considered as a reference method) was assessed by Bland–Altman plots: LVEF difference (myocardial perfusion scintigraphy minus echocardiography ) against average LVEF ( MPS + Echo 2 ). Results Of patients who had myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography performed within six months, mean LVEF difference = +1.1% (95% limits of agreement: −19.3 to +21.6) in men but +10.9% (−10.7 to +32.5) in women. LVEF difference diverged from zero marginally in men (mean difference = +1.1, 95%CI = +0.1 to +2.1, p = 0.028) but more in women (+10.9, +9.8 to +12.1, p < 0.001). The LVEF difference correlated with average LVEF itself in both men (r = 0.305, p < 0.001) and women (r = 0.361, p < 0.001), and with age in women (r = 0.117, p = 0.031). Similar results were observed for the subset. Conclusions Caution should be taken when interpreting LVEF measured by different techniques due to their wide limits of agreement and systematic bias, more markedly in women.","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":" ","pages":"2048004020915393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2048004020915393","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in the agreement between left ventricular ejection fraction measured by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and by echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Sams Jaker, Amjad Burgan, Vineet Prakash, Alexander Birkinshaw, Kishan Moosai, Adam Jacques, David Fluck, Mark MacGregor, Otar Lazariashvili, Pankaj Sharma, Christopher H Fry, Thang S Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2048004020915393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is generally measured by echocardiography but is increasingly available with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. With myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, the threshold of LVEF below which there is a risk for myocardial infarct or sudden cardiac death is higher for women (51%) than for men (43%). We tested the hypothesis that such a sex difference may also occur with echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Methods Four hundred and four men, mean age = 67.7 ± SD = 12.3 yr; 339 women, 67.7 ± 11.7 yr had separate myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography examinations within six months. A subset of 327 of these patients (181 men, 68.8 ± 12.1 yr; 146 women, 66.4 ± 12.1 yr) had examinations within one month and were additionally analysed as this sub-group. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography were used to measure LVEF at rest and their agreement (neither considered as a reference method) was assessed by Bland–Altman plots: LVEF difference (myocardial perfusion scintigraphy minus echocardiography ) against average LVEF ( MPS + Echo 2 ). Results Of patients who had myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography performed within six months, mean LVEF difference = +1.1% (95% limits of agreement: −19.3 to +21.6) in men but +10.9% (−10.7 to +32.5) in women. LVEF difference diverged from zero marginally in men (mean difference = +1.1, 95%CI = +0.1 to +2.1, p = 0.028) but more in women (+10.9, +9.8 to +12.1, p < 0.001). The LVEF difference correlated with average LVEF itself in both men (r = 0.305, p < 0.001) and women (r = 0.361, p < 0.001), and with age in women (r = 0.117, p = 0.031). Similar results were observed for the subset. Conclusions Caution should be taken when interpreting LVEF measured by different techniques due to their wide limits of agreement and systematic bias, more markedly in women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2048004020915393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2048004020915393\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004020915393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004020915393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:左心室射血分数(LVEF)通常由超声心动图测量,但越来越多的心肌灌注显像可用。心肌灌注显像显示,低于LVEF有心肌梗死或心源性猝死风险的阈值,女性(51%)高于男性(43%)。我们检验了这样的假设,即这种性别差异也可能发生在超声心动图和心肌灌注显像上。方法:男性404例,平均年龄= 67.7±SD = 12.3 yr;339名女性(67.7±11.7岁)在6个月内分别进行了心肌灌注显像和超声心动图检查。327例患者(181例男性,68.8±12.1岁;146名妇女(66.4±12.1岁)在一个月内进行了检查,并作为该亚组进行分析。心肌灌注显像和超声心动图用于测量静息状态下的LVEF,并通过Bland-Altman图评估两者的一致性(均不作为参考方法):LVEF差(心肌灌注显像减去超声心动图)与平均LVEF (MPS + Echo 2)。结果:在6个月内进行心肌灌注显像和超声心动图检查的患者中,男性平均LVEF差= +1.1%(95%一致限:-19.3至+21.6),而女性平均LVEF差= +10.9%(-10.7至+32.5)。男性的LVEF差异与零有轻微差异(平均差异= +1.1,95%CI = +0.1至+2.1,p = 0.028),但女性的差异更大(+10.9,+9.8至+12.1,p r = 0.305, p r = 0.361, p r = 0.117, p = 0.031)。在子集中观察到类似的结果。结论:在解释不同技术测量的LVEF时应谨慎,因为它们具有广泛的一致性限制和系统偏差,在女性中更为明显。
Sex differences in the agreement between left ventricular ejection fraction measured by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and by echocardiography.
Background Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is generally measured by echocardiography but is increasingly available with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. With myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, the threshold of LVEF below which there is a risk for myocardial infarct or sudden cardiac death is higher for women (51%) than for men (43%). We tested the hypothesis that such a sex difference may also occur with echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Methods Four hundred and four men, mean age = 67.7 ± SD = 12.3 yr; 339 women, 67.7 ± 11.7 yr had separate myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography examinations within six months. A subset of 327 of these patients (181 men, 68.8 ± 12.1 yr; 146 women, 66.4 ± 12.1 yr) had examinations within one month and were additionally analysed as this sub-group. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography were used to measure LVEF at rest and their agreement (neither considered as a reference method) was assessed by Bland–Altman plots: LVEF difference (myocardial perfusion scintigraphy minus echocardiography ) against average LVEF ( MPS + Echo 2 ). Results Of patients who had myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography performed within six months, mean LVEF difference = +1.1% (95% limits of agreement: −19.3 to +21.6) in men but +10.9% (−10.7 to +32.5) in women. LVEF difference diverged from zero marginally in men (mean difference = +1.1, 95%CI = +0.1 to +2.1, p = 0.028) but more in women (+10.9, +9.8 to +12.1, p < 0.001). The LVEF difference correlated with average LVEF itself in both men (r = 0.305, p < 0.001) and women (r = 0.361, p < 0.001), and with age in women (r = 0.117, p = 0.031). Similar results were observed for the subset. Conclusions Caution should be taken when interpreting LVEF measured by different techniques due to their wide limits of agreement and systematic bias, more markedly in women.