混沌预测任务中的认知负荷和疲劳动态。

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Stephen J Guastello, William Futch, Lucas Mirabito
{"title":"混沌预测任务中的认知负荷和疲劳动态。","authors":"Stephen J Guastello,&nbsp;William Futch,&nbsp;Lucas Mirabito","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many real-world tasks require people to forecast chaotic events in order to take adaptive action. This ability is considered rare, and less understood than other cognitive processes. The present study examined how the performance dynamics in a chaotic forecasting task would be affected by stressors such as cognitive workload and fatigue using two cusp catastrophe models. Participants were 147 undergraduates who were shown graphs and brief chaotic number series for which they needed to forecast the next four values. Performance data were complemented by variables known to represent cognitive elasticity versus rigidity, compensatory abilities for fatigue, and NASA TLX ratings of subjective workload. R2 for the workload cusp was .56, which compared favorably to the next best linear alternative model (.12); it contained six bifurcation variables and three measures of workload (asymmetry). R2 for the fatigue cusp was .54, which also compared favorably to the next best linear alternative (.07); it contained one bifurcation variable and two compensatory abilities. The role of field independence as an elasticity variable in the workload model and as a compensatory ability in fatigue was particularly noteworthy. Several elasticity-rigidity variables have now been identified over a series of studies. They appear to be operating in unison to produce a bifurcation effect, and different variables become salient depending on the task. Future research should consider how the ability to forecast chaos and its susceptibility to workload and fatigue carry over to dynamical decisions made while managing a complex system. Key Words.</p>","PeriodicalId":46218,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Workload and Fatigue Dynamics in a Chaotic Forecasting Task.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen J Guastello,&nbsp;William Futch,&nbsp;Lucas Mirabito\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many real-world tasks require people to forecast chaotic events in order to take adaptive action. This ability is considered rare, and less understood than other cognitive processes. The present study examined how the performance dynamics in a chaotic forecasting task would be affected by stressors such as cognitive workload and fatigue using two cusp catastrophe models. Participants were 147 undergraduates who were shown graphs and brief chaotic number series for which they needed to forecast the next four values. Performance data were complemented by variables known to represent cognitive elasticity versus rigidity, compensatory abilities for fatigue, and NASA TLX ratings of subjective workload. R2 for the workload cusp was .56, which compared favorably to the next best linear alternative model (.12); it contained six bifurcation variables and three measures of workload (asymmetry). R2 for the fatigue cusp was .54, which also compared favorably to the next best linear alternative (.07); it contained one bifurcation variable and two compensatory abilities. The role of field independence as an elasticity variable in the workload model and as a compensatory ability in fatigue was particularly noteworthy. Several elasticity-rigidity variables have now been identified over a series of studies. They appear to be operating in unison to produce a bifurcation effect, and different variables become salient depending on the task. Future research should consider how the ability to forecast chaos and its susceptibility to workload and fatigue carry over to dynamical decisions made while managing a complex system. Key Words.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多现实世界的任务需要人们预测混乱事件,以便采取适应性行动。这种能力被认为是罕见的,比其他认知过程更不为人所知。本研究利用两个尖点突变模型,研究了认知负荷和疲劳等应激源对混沌预测任务中绩效动态的影响。参与者是147名大学生,他们被展示了图表和简短的混沌数列,他们需要预测接下来的四个值。性能数据由已知代表认知弹性与刚性、疲劳补偿能力和NASA TLX主观工作量评级的变量补充。工作负荷顶点的R2为0.56,优于次优的线性替代模型(0.12);它包含六个分岔变量和三个工作量测量(不对称)。疲劳尖端的R2为0.54,也优于次优线性替代方案(0.07);它包含一个分岔变量和两个补偿能力。现场独立性作为工作量模型中的弹性变量和疲劳补偿能力的作用特别值得注意。在一系列的研究中,已经确定了几个弹性-刚性变量。它们似乎在一起运作,产生了分岔效应,不同的变量因任务的不同而变得突出。未来的研究应该考虑如何预测混乱的能力及其对工作量和疲劳的敏感性在管理复杂系统时进行动态决策。关键字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Workload and Fatigue Dynamics in a Chaotic Forecasting Task.

Many real-world tasks require people to forecast chaotic events in order to take adaptive action. This ability is considered rare, and less understood than other cognitive processes. The present study examined how the performance dynamics in a chaotic forecasting task would be affected by stressors such as cognitive workload and fatigue using two cusp catastrophe models. Participants were 147 undergraduates who were shown graphs and brief chaotic number series for which they needed to forecast the next four values. Performance data were complemented by variables known to represent cognitive elasticity versus rigidity, compensatory abilities for fatigue, and NASA TLX ratings of subjective workload. R2 for the workload cusp was .56, which compared favorably to the next best linear alternative model (.12); it contained six bifurcation variables and three measures of workload (asymmetry). R2 for the fatigue cusp was .54, which also compared favorably to the next best linear alternative (.07); it contained one bifurcation variable and two compensatory abilities. The role of field independence as an elasticity variable in the workload model and as a compensatory ability in fatigue was particularly noteworthy. Several elasticity-rigidity variables have now been identified over a series of studies. They appear to be operating in unison to produce a bifurcation effect, and different variables become salient depending on the task. Future research should consider how the ability to forecast chaos and its susceptibility to workload and fatigue carry over to dynamical decisions made while managing a complex system. Key Words.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信