推测不是证据:抗高血压治疗和COVID-19。

Giovanni de Simone, Costantino Mancusi
{"title":"推测不是证据:抗高血压治疗和COVID-19。","authors":"Giovanni de Simone, Costantino Mancusi","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2003, a group of Chinese investigators documented that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a functional receptor of the SARS-CoV virus. The virus–ACE2 receptor binding is thought to be responsible for cell invasion and ultimately for the manifestation of the disease. Right after the warning of a new SARS outbreak (COVID-19) related to a new coronavirus of bat origin, called SARS-CoV2, Chen et al. documented that the SARS-CoV2 receptor-binding domain also exhibits strong interaction with ACE2, followed by evidence that, similarly to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV2 uses the ACE2 receptor for cell entry. Similarly to the SARS-CoV virus, SARS-CoV2 is thought to down-regulate the ACE2 receptor, but does not affect ACE, thus substantially reducing the counter-regulatory effect of the ACE2 system and amplifying the effect of angiotensin II (AngII). ACE2 cleaves AngII and also angiotensin I (AngI), and generates a smaller peptide, angiotensin 1-7 (Ang1-7) regulating the availability of AngII at the AT1 receptor level. Ang1-7 binds a specific Mas receptor to counteract AngII activity with opposite effects, i.e. vasodilation, anti-inflammation, and antiproliferation. The down-regulation of ACE2, also due to SARS-CoV2 infection, therefore affects the regulation of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), especially in the lung and kidney, but also in the heart, where ACE2 is well represented. Blunting the inhibitory regulation of ACE2 would leave AngII binding on the AT1 receptor free from an important counter-regulation, with consequent uncontrolled pro-inflammatory action and further down-regulation of ACE2 due to positive feedback with AngioII. In animal experiments, during SARS-CoV infection or recombinant SARS-CoV spike protein binding to ACE2, the devastating inflammation of the lungs could be prevented by losartan, the ancestor of AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs). A review recently published clearly indicates the possibility of using ARBs as a therapy for COVID-19. Controlling AngII production with ACE inhibitors or ARBs breaks down the positive feedback reported for AngII and ACE2 and helps in restoring the ACE2 domain. The AngioI cleavage induced by ACE2 also produces another peptide, angiotensin 1-9 (Ang1-9), able to reverse experimental hypertension and thought to potentiate bradykinin action and to activate the counter-regulatory AT2 receptor. On 11 March, The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine published a letter by Fang et al. that is having great impact both in the conventional and social media, raising and spreading alarm among physicians and hypertensive patients. The hypothesis of the authors moves from a suggested, but unproven, overexpression of ACE2 in patients with diabetes and/or arterial hypertension admitted to hospital with COVID-19, and the scarce evidence that these conditions independently increase the risk of mortality . Actually, SARS-CoV2 infection, rather than overexpressing, down-regulates ACE2 and the hypothesis that COVID-19 causes ACE2 overexpression lacks evidence. However, even speculating that ACE2 is overexpressed in these patients, the authors also assume that therapy with ACE inhibitors or ARBs can facilitate infection with COVID-19 and even increases the risk of developing severe and fatal COVID-19, because both hypertensive and diabetic patients are most often treated with those medications. ACE2 overexpression, when it occurs, is most likely to be part of a defensive mechanism, and in the case of COVID-19 might be induced by the severe down-regulation caused by SARS-CoV2 binding. As a counter-regulatory system, ACE2 is one of the mechanisms through which anti-RAS medications work to substantially reduce risk of cardiovascular disease due to hypertension and diabetes. ACE2 is indeed overexpressed in conditions associated with general or local harmful effects of AngII, such as heart failure and ischaemic heart disease. Experimental studies indicate that up-regulation of ACE2 might be a potent protective mechanisms against AngII-mediated organ damage. There is no evidence that, because of the ACE2 overexpression, the SARS-CoV2 infection can be facilitated. Rather, there are opposite opinions derived from other viral outbreaks. In Sierra Leone, Ebola infection has been empirically treated using a combination of ARBs and statins. Studies on influenza from the University of Virginia also suggest that these medications increase resistance to the effect of viral infections in general, and raise an interesting hypothesis about targeting with therapy individual resistance to","PeriodicalId":11995,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"133-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa021","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speculation is not evidence: antihypertensive therapy and COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni de Simone, Costantino Mancusi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2003, a group of Chinese investigators documented that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a functional receptor of the SARS-CoV virus. The virus–ACE2 receptor binding is thought to be responsible for cell invasion and ultimately for the manifestation of the disease. Right after the warning of a new SARS outbreak (COVID-19) related to a new coronavirus of bat origin, called SARS-CoV2, Chen et al. documented that the SARS-CoV2 receptor-binding domain also exhibits strong interaction with ACE2, followed by evidence that, similarly to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV2 uses the ACE2 receptor for cell entry. Similarly to the SARS-CoV virus, SARS-CoV2 is thought to down-regulate the ACE2 receptor, but does not affect ACE, thus substantially reducing the counter-regulatory effect of the ACE2 system and amplifying the effect of angiotensin II (AngII). ACE2 cleaves AngII and also angiotensin I (AngI), and generates a smaller peptide, angiotensin 1-7 (Ang1-7) regulating the availability of AngII at the AT1 receptor level. Ang1-7 binds a specific Mas receptor to counteract AngII activity with opposite effects, i.e. vasodilation, anti-inflammation, and antiproliferation. The down-regulation of ACE2, also due to SARS-CoV2 infection, therefore affects the regulation of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), especially in the lung and kidney, but also in the heart, where ACE2 is well represented. Blunting the inhibitory regulation of ACE2 would leave AngII binding on the AT1 receptor free from an important counter-regulation, with consequent uncontrolled pro-inflammatory action and further down-regulation of ACE2 due to positive feedback with AngioII. In animal experiments, during SARS-CoV infection or recombinant SARS-CoV spike protein binding to ACE2, the devastating inflammation of the lungs could be prevented by losartan, the ancestor of AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs). A review recently published clearly indicates the possibility of using ARBs as a therapy for COVID-19. Controlling AngII production with ACE inhibitors or ARBs breaks down the positive feedback reported for AngII and ACE2 and helps in restoring the ACE2 domain. The AngioI cleavage induced by ACE2 also produces another peptide, angiotensin 1-9 (Ang1-9), able to reverse experimental hypertension and thought to potentiate bradykinin action and to activate the counter-regulatory AT2 receptor. On 11 March, The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine published a letter by Fang et al. that is having great impact both in the conventional and social media, raising and spreading alarm among physicians and hypertensive patients. The hypothesis of the authors moves from a suggested, but unproven, overexpression of ACE2 in patients with diabetes and/or arterial hypertension admitted to hospital with COVID-19, and the scarce evidence that these conditions independently increase the risk of mortality . Actually, SARS-CoV2 infection, rather than overexpressing, down-regulates ACE2 and the hypothesis that COVID-19 causes ACE2 overexpression lacks evidence. However, even speculating that ACE2 is overexpressed in these patients, the authors also assume that therapy with ACE inhibitors or ARBs can facilitate infection with COVID-19 and even increases the risk of developing severe and fatal COVID-19, because both hypertensive and diabetic patients are most often treated with those medications. ACE2 overexpression, when it occurs, is most likely to be part of a defensive mechanism, and in the case of COVID-19 might be induced by the severe down-regulation caused by SARS-CoV2 binding. As a counter-regulatory system, ACE2 is one of the mechanisms through which anti-RAS medications work to substantially reduce risk of cardiovascular disease due to hypertension and diabetes. ACE2 is indeed overexpressed in conditions associated with general or local harmful effects of AngII, such as heart failure and ischaemic heart disease. Experimental studies indicate that up-regulation of ACE2 might be a potent protective mechanisms against AngII-mediated organ damage. There is no evidence that, because of the ACE2 overexpression, the SARS-CoV2 infection can be facilitated. Rather, there are opposite opinions derived from other viral outbreaks. In Sierra Leone, Ebola infection has been empirically treated using a combination of ARBs and statins. Studies on influenza from the University of Virginia also suggest that these medications increase resistance to the effect of viral infections in general, and raise an interesting hypothesis about targeting with therapy individual resistance to\",\"PeriodicalId\":11995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"133-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa021\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speculation is not evidence: antihypertensive therapy and COVID-19.
In 2003, a group of Chinese investigators documented that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a functional receptor of the SARS-CoV virus. The virus–ACE2 receptor binding is thought to be responsible for cell invasion and ultimately for the manifestation of the disease. Right after the warning of a new SARS outbreak (COVID-19) related to a new coronavirus of bat origin, called SARS-CoV2, Chen et al. documented that the SARS-CoV2 receptor-binding domain also exhibits strong interaction with ACE2, followed by evidence that, similarly to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV2 uses the ACE2 receptor for cell entry. Similarly to the SARS-CoV virus, SARS-CoV2 is thought to down-regulate the ACE2 receptor, but does not affect ACE, thus substantially reducing the counter-regulatory effect of the ACE2 system and amplifying the effect of angiotensin II (AngII). ACE2 cleaves AngII and also angiotensin I (AngI), and generates a smaller peptide, angiotensin 1-7 (Ang1-7) regulating the availability of AngII at the AT1 receptor level. Ang1-7 binds a specific Mas receptor to counteract AngII activity with opposite effects, i.e. vasodilation, anti-inflammation, and antiproliferation. The down-regulation of ACE2, also due to SARS-CoV2 infection, therefore affects the regulation of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), especially in the lung and kidney, but also in the heart, where ACE2 is well represented. Blunting the inhibitory regulation of ACE2 would leave AngII binding on the AT1 receptor free from an important counter-regulation, with consequent uncontrolled pro-inflammatory action and further down-regulation of ACE2 due to positive feedback with AngioII. In animal experiments, during SARS-CoV infection or recombinant SARS-CoV spike protein binding to ACE2, the devastating inflammation of the lungs could be prevented by losartan, the ancestor of AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs). A review recently published clearly indicates the possibility of using ARBs as a therapy for COVID-19. Controlling AngII production with ACE inhibitors or ARBs breaks down the positive feedback reported for AngII and ACE2 and helps in restoring the ACE2 domain. The AngioI cleavage induced by ACE2 also produces another peptide, angiotensin 1-9 (Ang1-9), able to reverse experimental hypertension and thought to potentiate bradykinin action and to activate the counter-regulatory AT2 receptor. On 11 March, The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine published a letter by Fang et al. that is having great impact both in the conventional and social media, raising and spreading alarm among physicians and hypertensive patients. The hypothesis of the authors moves from a suggested, but unproven, overexpression of ACE2 in patients with diabetes and/or arterial hypertension admitted to hospital with COVID-19, and the scarce evidence that these conditions independently increase the risk of mortality . Actually, SARS-CoV2 infection, rather than overexpressing, down-regulates ACE2 and the hypothesis that COVID-19 causes ACE2 overexpression lacks evidence. However, even speculating that ACE2 is overexpressed in these patients, the authors also assume that therapy with ACE inhibitors or ARBs can facilitate infection with COVID-19 and even increases the risk of developing severe and fatal COVID-19, because both hypertensive and diabetic patients are most often treated with those medications. ACE2 overexpression, when it occurs, is most likely to be part of a defensive mechanism, and in the case of COVID-19 might be induced by the severe down-regulation caused by SARS-CoV2 binding. As a counter-regulatory system, ACE2 is one of the mechanisms through which anti-RAS medications work to substantially reduce risk of cardiovascular disease due to hypertension and diabetes. ACE2 is indeed overexpressed in conditions associated with general or local harmful effects of AngII, such as heart failure and ischaemic heart disease. Experimental studies indicate that up-regulation of ACE2 might be a potent protective mechanisms against AngII-mediated organ damage. There is no evidence that, because of the ACE2 overexpression, the SARS-CoV2 infection can be facilitated. Rather, there are opposite opinions derived from other viral outbreaks. In Sierra Leone, Ebola infection has been empirically treated using a combination of ARBs and statins. Studies on influenza from the University of Virginia also suggest that these medications increase resistance to the effect of viral infections in general, and raise an interesting hypothesis about targeting with therapy individual resistance to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信