加拿大和美国核医学奖学金网站内容评价。

Saira Hamid, Brian Gibney, Bonnie Niu, Rachel Phord-Toy, Nicolas Murray, Arvind Vijayasarathi, Savvas Nicolaou, Faisal Khosa
{"title":"加拿大和美国核医学奖学金网站内容评价。","authors":"Saira Hamid,&nbsp;Brian Gibney,&nbsp;Bonnie Niu,&nbsp;Rachel Phord-Toy,&nbsp;Nicolas Murray,&nbsp;Arvind Vijayasarathi,&nbsp;Savvas Nicolaou,&nbsp;Faisal Khosa","doi":"10.1177/0846537120913031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiology trainees frequently use the Internet to research potential fellowship programs across all subspecialties. For a field like nuclear medicine, which has multiple training pathways, program websites can be an essential resource for potential applicants. This study aimed to analyze the online content of Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The content of all active Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites was evaluated using 26 criteria in the following subdivisions: application, recruitment, education, research, clinical work, and incentives. Fellowships without websites were excluded from the study. Scores were summed per program and compared by geographic region and ranking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 active Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship programs were identified, of which 39 fellowships had dedicated fellowship websites available for the analysis. On average, fellowship websites contained 34.4% (9 ± 3.3) of the 26 criteria. Programs did not score differently on the criteria by geographical distribution (<i>P</i> = .08) nor by ranking (<i>P</i> = .18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites are lacking content relevant to prospective fellows. Addressing inadequacies in online content may support programs to inform and recruit residents into fellowship programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":444006,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes","volume":" ","pages":"392-397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0846537120913031","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of the Content of Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine Fellowship Websites.\",\"authors\":\"Saira Hamid,&nbsp;Brian Gibney,&nbsp;Bonnie Niu,&nbsp;Rachel Phord-Toy,&nbsp;Nicolas Murray,&nbsp;Arvind Vijayasarathi,&nbsp;Savvas Nicolaou,&nbsp;Faisal Khosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0846537120913031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiology trainees frequently use the Internet to research potential fellowship programs across all subspecialties. For a field like nuclear medicine, which has multiple training pathways, program websites can be an essential resource for potential applicants. This study aimed to analyze the online content of Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The content of all active Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites was evaluated using 26 criteria in the following subdivisions: application, recruitment, education, research, clinical work, and incentives. Fellowships without websites were excluded from the study. Scores were summed per program and compared by geographic region and ranking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 active Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship programs were identified, of which 39 fellowships had dedicated fellowship websites available for the analysis. On average, fellowship websites contained 34.4% (9 ± 3.3) of the 26 criteria. Programs did not score differently on the criteria by geographical distribution (<i>P</i> = .08) nor by ranking (<i>P</i> = .18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites are lacking content relevant to prospective fellows. Addressing inadequacies in online content may support programs to inform and recruit residents into fellowship programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":444006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"392-397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0846537120913031\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537120913031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/3/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537120913031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:放射学受训者经常使用互联网来研究所有亚专业的潜在奖学金项目。对于像核医学这样有多种培训途径的领域,项目网站可以成为潜在申请者的重要资源。本研究旨在分析加拿大和美国核医学奖学金网站的在线内容。材料和方法:所有活跃的加拿大和美国核医学奖学金网站的内容使用以下细分的26个标准进行评估:申请、招聘、教育、研究、临床工作和激励。没有网站的奖学金被排除在研究之外。对每个项目的得分进行汇总,并按地理区域和排名进行比较。结果:总共确定了42个活跃的加拿大和美国核医学奖学金项目,其中39个奖学金项目有专门的奖学金网站可供分析。奖学金网站平均包含26个标准中的34.4%(9±3.3)个。项目在地理分布(P = .08)和排名(P = .18)的评分标准上没有差异。结论:大多数加拿大和美国的核医学奖学金网站缺乏与潜在研究员相关的内容。解决在线内容的不足之处可能会支持项目通知和招募住院医生参加奖学金项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of the Content of Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine Fellowship Websites.

Background: Radiology trainees frequently use the Internet to research potential fellowship programs across all subspecialties. For a field like nuclear medicine, which has multiple training pathways, program websites can be an essential resource for potential applicants. This study aimed to analyze the online content of Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites.

Materials and methods: The content of all active Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites was evaluated using 26 criteria in the following subdivisions: application, recruitment, education, research, clinical work, and incentives. Fellowships without websites were excluded from the study. Scores were summed per program and compared by geographic region and ranking.

Results: A total of 42 active Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship programs were identified, of which 39 fellowships had dedicated fellowship websites available for the analysis. On average, fellowship websites contained 34.4% (9 ± 3.3) of the 26 criteria. Programs did not score differently on the criteria by geographical distribution (P = .08) nor by ranking (P = .18).

Conclusion: Most Canadian and American Nuclear Medicine fellowship websites are lacking content relevant to prospective fellows. Addressing inadequacies in online content may support programs to inform and recruit residents into fellowship programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信