大语境问题及其在教育中的应用:一些当代例子。

Q2 Social Sciences
Ian Winchester
{"title":"大语境问题及其在教育中的应用:一些当代例子。","authors":"Ian Winchester","doi":"10.1007/s10780-006-8397-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some 35 years ago, Gerard K. O'Neill used the large context of space travel with his undergraduate physics students. A Canadian physics teacher, Art Stinner, independently arrived at a similar notion in a more limited but, therefore, more generally useful sense, which he referred to as the \"large context problem\" approach. At a slightly earlier time the large context problem type of approach had already been used in the study of medicine, pioneered by McMaster Medical School. And the Faculty of Education at the University of Calgary currently uses a large context problem method to deliver its entire curriculum. These approaches are four distinct ways of presenting large context problems to students. This paper will discuss these approaches historically, look at their grounds and their applications, weigh their successes and characterize their limitations. It will try to see what they take most deeply for granted as viable approaches to teaching science, both theoretical and applied. Finally, it will relate these approaches to the constructivist prejudices of our own time, suggesting their relation to earlier forms of philosophical idealism.</p>","PeriodicalId":39982,"journal":{"name":"Interchange","volume":"37 1","pages":"7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10780-006-8397-x","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large Context Problems and Their Applications to Education: Some Contemporary Examples.\",\"authors\":\"Ian Winchester\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10780-006-8397-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Some 35 years ago, Gerard K. O'Neill used the large context of space travel with his undergraduate physics students. A Canadian physics teacher, Art Stinner, independently arrived at a similar notion in a more limited but, therefore, more generally useful sense, which he referred to as the \\\"large context problem\\\" approach. At a slightly earlier time the large context problem type of approach had already been used in the study of medicine, pioneered by McMaster Medical School. And the Faculty of Education at the University of Calgary currently uses a large context problem method to deliver its entire curriculum. These approaches are four distinct ways of presenting large context problems to students. This paper will discuss these approaches historically, look at their grounds and their applications, weigh their successes and characterize their limitations. It will try to see what they take most deeply for granted as viable approaches to teaching science, both theoretical and applied. Finally, it will relate these approaches to the constructivist prejudices of our own time, suggesting their relation to earlier forms of philosophical idealism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interchange\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"7-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10780-006-8397-x\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interchange\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-006-8397-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-006-8397-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

大约35年前,杰拉德·k·奥尼尔(Gerard K. O'Neill)用太空旅行的大背景来指导他的物理学本科学生。一位加拿大的物理老师,Art Stinner,独立地得出了一个类似的概念,在一个更有限的,但因此更普遍有用的意义上,他称之为“大背景问题”的方法。在稍早的时候,大背景问题类型的方法已经在医学研究中使用,由麦克马斯特医学院首创。卡尔加里大学(University of Calgary)的教育学院目前使用一种大型上下文问题方法来教授整个课程。这些方法是向学生呈现大背景问题的四种不同方式。本文将从历史上讨论这些方法,考察它们的基础和应用,衡量它们的成功,并描述它们的局限性。它将试图找出他们认为最理所当然的可行的科学教学方法,包括理论和应用。最后,它将把这些方法与我们自己时代的建构主义偏见联系起来,暗示它们与早期形式的哲学唯心主义的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large Context Problems and Their Applications to Education: Some Contemporary Examples.

Some 35 years ago, Gerard K. O'Neill used the large context of space travel with his undergraduate physics students. A Canadian physics teacher, Art Stinner, independently arrived at a similar notion in a more limited but, therefore, more generally useful sense, which he referred to as the "large context problem" approach. At a slightly earlier time the large context problem type of approach had already been used in the study of medicine, pioneered by McMaster Medical School. And the Faculty of Education at the University of Calgary currently uses a large context problem method to deliver its entire curriculum. These approaches are four distinct ways of presenting large context problems to students. This paper will discuss these approaches historically, look at their grounds and their applications, weigh their successes and characterize their limitations. It will try to see what they take most deeply for granted as viable approaches to teaching science, both theoretical and applied. Finally, it will relate these approaches to the constructivist prejudices of our own time, suggesting their relation to earlier forms of philosophical idealism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interchange
Interchange Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Interchange, an externally refereed educational quarterly, embraces educational theory, research, analysis, history, philosophy, policy and practices. The journal seeks to foster exchanges among practitioners, policy-makers, and scholars and to provide a forum for comment on issues and trends in education. The journal specializes in frank argumentative articles on the fundamental purposes of education. Its articles typically challenge conventional assumptions about education and higher education and do so from perspectives in philosophy or the social sciences. A special feature is the publishing of responses, and frequently response to responses, in the same issue as the article which provoked them. Its authors are scattered throught the world. All contributions to this journal are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信