在营养学研究中，快速血糖监测可以准确反映健康成人餐后血糖的变化。

IF 3.4 4区医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS

Journal of the American College of Nutrition Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-03-26 DOI:10.1080/07315724.2020.1734990

Tommy H T Wong, Jennifer M F Wan, Jimmy Chun Yu Louie

{"title":"在营养学研究中，快速血糖监测可以准确反映健康成人餐后血糖的变化。","authors":"Tommy H T Wong, Jennifer M F Wan, Jimmy Chun Yu Louie","doi":"10.1080/07315724.2020.1734990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study investigated the accuracy of a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) in a postprandial setting.Methods: Ten fasted adults without diabetes wore the FGMS sensors then consumed a standard breakfast. Their glucose levels were subsequently recorded for 2 hours, both by the FGMS and by measuring capillary glucose levels using the glucose oxidase method. The accuracy of the FGMS data was assessed using the accuracy limits stated in ISO 15197:2013.Results: FGMS measurements were mostly lower than glucose oxidase measurements (mean absolute relative difference ± SD: 25.4 ± 17.0%, p < 0.001). However, the maximum difference from baseline captured by the two methods was not significantly different (mean ± SD, glucose oxidase: 58.5 ± 18.9 mg/dl; FGMS, 54.4 ± 28.9 mg/dl, p = 0.366).Conclusions: FGMS could track the incremental glycaemic excursions after meals in adults without diabetes, yet further studies with greater sample sizes are needed to confirm this finding.","PeriodicalId":17193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Nutrition","volume":"40 1","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07315724.2020.1734990","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flash Glucose Monitoring Can Accurately Reflect Postprandial Glucose Changes in Healthy Adults in Nutrition Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Tommy H T Wong, Jennifer M F Wan, Jimmy Chun Yu Louie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07315724.2020.1734990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study investigated the accuracy of a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) in a postprandial setting.Methods: Ten fasted adults without diabetes wore the FGMS sensors then consumed a standard breakfast. Their glucose levels were subsequently recorded for 2 hours, both by the FGMS and by measuring capillary glucose levels using the glucose oxidase method. The accuracy of the FGMS data was assessed using the accuracy limits stated in ISO 15197:2013.Results: FGMS measurements were mostly lower than glucose oxidase measurements (mean absolute relative difference ± SD: 25.4 ± 17.0%, p < 0.001). However, the maximum difference from baseline captured by the two methods was not significantly different (mean ± SD, glucose oxidase: 58.5 ± 18.9 mg/dl; FGMS, 54.4 ± 28.9 mg/dl, p = 0.366).Conclusions: FGMS could track the incremental glycaemic excursions after meals in adults without diabetes, yet further studies with greater sample sizes are needed to confirm this finding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"26-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07315724.2020.1734990\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2020.1734990\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2020.1734990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:本研究探讨餐后血糖瞬时监测系统(FGMS)的准确性。方法:10名没有糖尿病的禁食成年人戴上FGMS传感器，然后吃一顿标准早餐。随后，通过FGMS和葡萄糖氧化酶法测量毛细血管葡萄糖水平，记录他们的血糖水平2小时。使用ISO 15197:2013中规定的精度限制来评估FGMS数据的准确性。结果:FGMS测定值大多低于葡萄糖氧化酶测定值(平均绝对相对差±SD: 25.4±17.0%，p SD，葡萄糖氧化酶:58.5±18.9 mg/dl;FGMS为54.4±28.9 mg/dl, p = 0.366)。结论:FGMS可以追踪非糖尿病成年人餐后血糖的增加，但需要进一步的研究来证实这一发现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Flash Glucose Monitoring Can Accurately Reflect Postprandial Glucose Changes in Healthy Adults in Nutrition Studies.

Objective: This study investigated the accuracy of a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) in a postprandial setting.

Methods: Ten fasted adults without diabetes wore the FGMS sensors then consumed a standard breakfast. Their glucose levels were subsequently recorded for 2 hours, both by the FGMS and by measuring capillary glucose levels using the glucose oxidase method. The accuracy of the FGMS data was assessed using the accuracy limits stated in ISO 15197:2013.

Results: FGMS measurements were mostly lower than glucose oxidase measurements (mean absolute relative difference ± SD: 25.4 ± 17.0%, p < 0.001). However, the maximum difference from baseline captured by the two methods was not significantly different (mean ± SD, glucose oxidase: 58.5 ± 18.9 mg/dl; FGMS, 54.4 ± 28.9 mg/dl, p = 0.366).

Conclusions: FGMS could track the incremental glycaemic excursions after meals in adults without diabetes, yet further studies with greater sample sizes are needed to confirm this finding.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of the American College of Nutrition 医学-营养学

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of the American College of Nutrition accepts the following types of submissions: Original and innovative research in nutrition science with useful application for researchers, physicians, nutritionists, and other healthcare professionals with emphasis on discoveries which help to individualize or "personalize" nutrition science; Critical reviews on pertinent nutrition topics that highlight key teaching points and relevance to nutrition; Letters to the editors and commentaries on important issues in the field of nutrition; Abstract clusters on nutritional topics with editorial comments; Book reviews; Abstracts from the annual meeting of the American College of Nutrition in the October issue.