过敏原特异性IgE:皮肤点刺试验与实际血清检测的比较。

Allergologie Select Pub Date : 2019-12-30 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5414/ALX01891E
D Bignardi, P Comite, I Mori, F Ferrero, V Fontana, M Bruzzone, M Mussap, G Ciprandi
{"title":"过敏原特异性IgE:皮肤点刺试验与实际血清检测的比较。","authors":"D Bignardi,&nbsp;P Comite,&nbsp;I Mori,&nbsp;F Ferrero,&nbsp;V Fontana,&nbsp;M Bruzzone,&nbsp;M Mussap,&nbsp;G Ciprandi","doi":"10.5414/ALX01891E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most common sensitizing allergens in in the area of Liguria region (Northwestern Italy) are pollens, mainly <i>Parietaria</i> and cypress, house dust mites, i.e. <i>Dermatophagoides</i>, and pets. IgE assessment is a crucial step in allergy diagnosis. It may be performed by skin prick test (SPT) or serum IgE (sIgE) assay. Therefore, this study compared these two methods in a real-life setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 793 subjects, who were referred to the Allergy Department for respiratory allergy during 2014. Inclusion criteria were i) documented diagnosis of allergic rhinitis (AR), and/or allergic asthma, and/or allergic conjunctivitis. SPT and sIgE assay were performed for 5 allergens, such as <i>Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus</i> (D1), cat (E1), <i>Parietaria officinalis</i> (W19), cypress (T23), and dog (E5), as they are the most common in our geographic area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using a positive SPT result as the target condition, remarkably high and statistically significant values of AUC, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94, were found. On the basis of the Youden index the following optimal classification threshold values were also computed: D1 = 0.22, E1 = 0.26, W19 = 0.61, T23 = 0.25, E5 = 0.34. These values allowed to define a set of sensitivity/specifity estimates ranging from 0.75 to 0.93 and from 0.83 to 0.93, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study shows that SPT and sIgE are two tests that are rather concordant, but with different sensitivity and specificity distinct for each allergen. In clinical practice, both tests should be used depending on clinical history features and obtained findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7485,"journal":{"name":"Allergologie Select","volume":"3 1","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066680/pdf/","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allergen-specific IgE: comparison between skin prick test and serum assay in real life.\",\"authors\":\"D Bignardi,&nbsp;P Comite,&nbsp;I Mori,&nbsp;F Ferrero,&nbsp;V Fontana,&nbsp;M Bruzzone,&nbsp;M Mussap,&nbsp;G Ciprandi\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/ALX01891E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most common sensitizing allergens in in the area of Liguria region (Northwestern Italy) are pollens, mainly <i>Parietaria</i> and cypress, house dust mites, i.e. <i>Dermatophagoides</i>, and pets. IgE assessment is a crucial step in allergy diagnosis. It may be performed by skin prick test (SPT) or serum IgE (sIgE) assay. Therefore, this study compared these two methods in a real-life setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 793 subjects, who were referred to the Allergy Department for respiratory allergy during 2014. Inclusion criteria were i) documented diagnosis of allergic rhinitis (AR), and/or allergic asthma, and/or allergic conjunctivitis. SPT and sIgE assay were performed for 5 allergens, such as <i>Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus</i> (D1), cat (E1), <i>Parietaria officinalis</i> (W19), cypress (T23), and dog (E5), as they are the most common in our geographic area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using a positive SPT result as the target condition, remarkably high and statistically significant values of AUC, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94, were found. On the basis of the Youden index the following optimal classification threshold values were also computed: D1 = 0.22, E1 = 0.26, W19 = 0.61, T23 = 0.25, E5 = 0.34. These values allowed to define a set of sensitivity/specifity estimates ranging from 0.75 to 0.93 and from 0.83 to 0.93, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study shows that SPT and sIgE are two tests that are rather concordant, but with different sensitivity and specificity distinct for each allergen. In clinical practice, both tests should be used depending on clinical history features and obtained findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergologie Select\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"9-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066680/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergologie Select\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX01891E\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologie Select","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX01891E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景:利古里亚地区(意大利西北部)最常见的致敏变应原是花粉,主要是顶木和柏树,室内尘螨,即食皮螨和宠物。IgE评估是过敏诊断的关键步骤。它可以通过皮肤点刺试验(SPT)或血清IgE (sIgE)测定来进行。因此,本研究在现实生活中比较了这两种方法。方法:回顾性研究纳入2014年因呼吸道过敏转诊至过敏科的793名受试者。纳入标准为:1)诊断为变应性鼻炎(AR),和/或过敏性哮喘,和/或过敏性结膜炎。对5种过敏原进行SPT和sIgE检测,分别为:翼状螨(D1)、猫(E1)、壁虱(W19)、柏树(T23)和狗(E5),这5种过敏原在本地区最为常见。结果:以SPT阳性为目标条件,AUC值在0.84 ~ 0.94之间,具有显著的高值和统计学意义。根据约登指数计算出最佳分类阈值D1 = 0.22, E1 = 0.26, W19 = 0.61, T23 = 0.25, E5 = 0.34。这些值允许定义一组灵敏度/特异性估计值,范围分别为0.75至0.93和0.83至0.93。结论:本研究表明SPT和sIgE是两种较为一致的检测方法,但对不同过敏原的敏感性和特异性不同。在临床实践中,应根据临床病史特征和所获得的结果来使用这两种检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Allergen-specific IgE: comparison between skin prick test and serum assay in real life.

Allergen-specific IgE: comparison between skin prick test and serum assay in real life.

Allergen-specific IgE: comparison between skin prick test and serum assay in real life.

Background: The most common sensitizing allergens in in the area of Liguria region (Northwestern Italy) are pollens, mainly Parietaria and cypress, house dust mites, i.e. Dermatophagoides, and pets. IgE assessment is a crucial step in allergy diagnosis. It may be performed by skin prick test (SPT) or serum IgE (sIgE) assay. Therefore, this study compared these two methods in a real-life setting.

Methods: This retrospective study included 793 subjects, who were referred to the Allergy Department for respiratory allergy during 2014. Inclusion criteria were i) documented diagnosis of allergic rhinitis (AR), and/or allergic asthma, and/or allergic conjunctivitis. SPT and sIgE assay were performed for 5 allergens, such as Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (D1), cat (E1), Parietaria officinalis (W19), cypress (T23), and dog (E5), as they are the most common in our geographic area.

Results: Using a positive SPT result as the target condition, remarkably high and statistically significant values of AUC, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94, were found. On the basis of the Youden index the following optimal classification threshold values were also computed: D1 = 0.22, E1 = 0.26, W19 = 0.61, T23 = 0.25, E5 = 0.34. These values allowed to define a set of sensitivity/specifity estimates ranging from 0.75 to 0.93 and from 0.83 to 0.93, respectively.

Conclusions: The present study shows that SPT and sIgE are two tests that are rather concordant, but with different sensitivity and specificity distinct for each allergen. In clinical practice, both tests should be used depending on clinical history features and obtained findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信