反射疗法和顺势疗法对传统哮喘治疗对气道炎症标志物的影响——一项随机研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2020-02-26 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2020.1726153
Ayfer Topcu, Anders Løkke, Leila Eriksen, Lars Peter Nielsen, Ronald Dahl
{"title":"反射疗法和顺势疗法对传统哮喘治疗对气道炎症标志物的影响——一项随机研究。","authors":"Ayfer Topcu,&nbsp;Anders Løkke,&nbsp;Leila Eriksen,&nbsp;Lars Peter Nielsen,&nbsp;Ronald Dahl","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2020.1726153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Asthma is a common chronic airway disease associated with hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation. Anti-inflammatory medication especially inhaled corticosteroids are important for control of airway inflammation, decrease of airway hyperresponsiveness and lung function variability, reduce asthma symptoms, and improve lung function as well as quality of life. Most studies investigating the influence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in asthma measure clinical effectiveness, but only few evaluate the impact on markers of airway inflammation. <b>Objective</b>: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of reflexology and homeopathy added to conventional treatment on different markers of airway inflammation in asthma. <b>Methods</b>: Eighty-four patients with asthma were randomized to receive conventional treatment alone or conventional treatment with addition of homeopathy or reflexology in a single center, investigator blinded, controlled, one-year trial. During the study period, patients regularly consulted their general practitioner for evaluation and asthma treatment. At randomization, and after 6 and 12 months, methacholine challenge test and measurement of exhaled nitric oxide were performed. Blood samples were collected for eosinophil count and measurement of serum eosinophil cationic protein. <b>Results</b>: No significant differences between groups for any of the inflammatory markers were demonstrated. Methacholine responsiveness improved in all three groups but improvements were not statistically significant within and between groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: This randomized controlled study of reflexology and homeopathy failed to show significant improvement on selected markers of inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"1726153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20018525.2020.1726153","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of reflexology and homeopathy added to conventional asthma treatment on markers of airway inflammation - a randomised study.\",\"authors\":\"Ayfer Topcu,&nbsp;Anders Løkke,&nbsp;Leila Eriksen,&nbsp;Lars Peter Nielsen,&nbsp;Ronald Dahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20018525.2020.1726153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Asthma is a common chronic airway disease associated with hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation. Anti-inflammatory medication especially inhaled corticosteroids are important for control of airway inflammation, decrease of airway hyperresponsiveness and lung function variability, reduce asthma symptoms, and improve lung function as well as quality of life. Most studies investigating the influence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in asthma measure clinical effectiveness, but only few evaluate the impact on markers of airway inflammation. <b>Objective</b>: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of reflexology and homeopathy added to conventional treatment on different markers of airway inflammation in asthma. <b>Methods</b>: Eighty-four patients with asthma were randomized to receive conventional treatment alone or conventional treatment with addition of homeopathy or reflexology in a single center, investigator blinded, controlled, one-year trial. During the study period, patients regularly consulted their general practitioner for evaluation and asthma treatment. At randomization, and after 6 and 12 months, methacholine challenge test and measurement of exhaled nitric oxide were performed. Blood samples were collected for eosinophil count and measurement of serum eosinophil cationic protein. <b>Results</b>: No significant differences between groups for any of the inflammatory markers were demonstrated. Methacholine responsiveness improved in all three groups but improvements were not statistically significant within and between groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: This randomized controlled study of reflexology and homeopathy failed to show significant improvement on selected markers of inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"1726153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20018525.2020.1726153\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2020.1726153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2020.1726153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:哮喘是一种常见的慢性气道疾病,与高反应性和气道炎症有关。抗炎药物特别是吸入性糖皮质激素对控制气道炎症、降低气道高反应性和肺功能变异性、减轻哮喘症状、改善肺功能和生活质量具有重要意义。大多数调查补充和替代医学(CAM)对哮喘影响的研究都测量了临床效果,但很少评估对气道炎症标志物的影响。目的:探讨在常规治疗基础上加用反射疗法和顺势疗法对哮喘不同气道炎症指标的影响。方法:84例哮喘患者在单中心随机接受常规治疗或常规治疗加顺势疗法或反射疗法,研究者盲法,对照,为期一年。在研究期间,患者定期咨询他们的全科医生评估和哮喘治疗。随机分组,6个月和12个月后,进行甲胆碱激发试验和呼出一氧化氮测量。采集血样进行嗜酸性粒细胞计数和血清嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白测定。结果:各组间炎症指标均无显著差异。三组患者的甲胆碱反应性均有改善,但组内和组间改善无统计学意义。结论:这项反射疗法和顺势疗法的随机对照研究未能显示出对哮喘炎症和气道高反应性选定标志物的显着改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of reflexology and homeopathy added to conventional asthma treatment on markers of airway inflammation - a randomised study.

The impact of reflexology and homeopathy added to conventional asthma treatment on markers of airway inflammation - a randomised study.

The impact of reflexology and homeopathy added to conventional asthma treatment on markers of airway inflammation - a randomised study.

The impact of reflexology and homeopathy added to conventional asthma treatment on markers of airway inflammation - a randomised study.

Background: Asthma is a common chronic airway disease associated with hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation. Anti-inflammatory medication especially inhaled corticosteroids are important for control of airway inflammation, decrease of airway hyperresponsiveness and lung function variability, reduce asthma symptoms, and improve lung function as well as quality of life. Most studies investigating the influence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in asthma measure clinical effectiveness, but only few evaluate the impact on markers of airway inflammation. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of reflexology and homeopathy added to conventional treatment on different markers of airway inflammation in asthma. Methods: Eighty-four patients with asthma were randomized to receive conventional treatment alone or conventional treatment with addition of homeopathy or reflexology in a single center, investigator blinded, controlled, one-year trial. During the study period, patients regularly consulted their general practitioner for evaluation and asthma treatment. At randomization, and after 6 and 12 months, methacholine challenge test and measurement of exhaled nitric oxide were performed. Blood samples were collected for eosinophil count and measurement of serum eosinophil cationic protein. Results: No significant differences between groups for any of the inflammatory markers were demonstrated. Methacholine responsiveness improved in all three groups but improvements were not statistically significant within and between groups. Conclusions: This randomized controlled study of reflexology and homeopathy failed to show significant improvement on selected markers of inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信