触觉接触作为提高快克可卡因使用者艾滋病毒/性病教育计划依从性/保留性的营销工具。

Psychology and mental health care : open access Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-01-20
Ralph Jay Johnson
{"title":"触觉接触作为提高快克可卡因使用者艾滋病毒/性病教育计划依从性/保留性的营销工具。","authors":"Ralph Jay Johnson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This research brief reports results from an exploratory pilot study on the use of socially acceptable touch in a public setting that accompanies a request to improve program compliance with \"street level\" crack cocaine users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study participants consisted of 120 crack cocaine-using participants in a larger community-based HIV/STD prevention and research program targeting at-risk African-Americans. They were required to return for a series of four booster health education sessions over 2-5 days and 6 month and 1 year follow-up assessments. The most difficult aspect of this program was no-shows for the second booster session; study participants who attended at least two sessions were much more likely to attend all sessions and complete the entire lengthy program. The program director randomly approached some participants after the first visit in a public setting and briefly touched them as part of a handshake; then, the director asked them to return for their follow-up sessions. Whether they were approached or not was random. Analysis comprised descriptive and non-parametric statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three percent of participants who were asked to return and were touched returned for the second session; only 75% returned who had been asked to do so but were not touched. A statistically significant difference favored being touched and complying, as measured by second-session returning participants (p < .01), though it appeared the touch / request had more of a preventive than a promotional effect. Extraneous demographic and background factors were ruled out with the exception of age (older participants), which contributed slightly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that a request \"anchored\" to a socially acceptable public touch is promising in terms of improving program participation and engagement. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":92947,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and mental health care : open access","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tactile Contact as a Marketing Tool for Improving an HIV/STD Education Program's Compliance / Retention with Crack Cocaine Users.\",\"authors\":\"Ralph Jay Johnson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This research brief reports results from an exploratory pilot study on the use of socially acceptable touch in a public setting that accompanies a request to improve program compliance with \\\"street level\\\" crack cocaine users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study participants consisted of 120 crack cocaine-using participants in a larger community-based HIV/STD prevention and research program targeting at-risk African-Americans. They were required to return for a series of four booster health education sessions over 2-5 days and 6 month and 1 year follow-up assessments. The most difficult aspect of this program was no-shows for the second booster session; study participants who attended at least two sessions were much more likely to attend all sessions and complete the entire lengthy program. The program director randomly approached some participants after the first visit in a public setting and briefly touched them as part of a handshake; then, the director asked them to return for their follow-up sessions. Whether they were approached or not was random. Analysis comprised descriptive and non-parametric statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three percent of participants who were asked to return and were touched returned for the second session; only 75% returned who had been asked to do so but were not touched. A statistically significant difference favored being touched and complying, as measured by second-session returning participants (p < .01), though it appeared the touch / request had more of a preventive than a promotional effect. Extraneous demographic and background factors were ruled out with the exception of age (older participants), which contributed slightly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that a request \\\"anchored\\\" to a socially acceptable public touch is promising in terms of improving program participation and engagement. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and mental health care : open access\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059775/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and mental health care : open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and mental health care : open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究简要报告了一项探索性试点研究的结果,该研究是关于在公共场合使用社会可接受的触摸,同时要求改善“街头”快克可卡因使用者的计划依从性。方法:研究参与者包括120名使用快克可卡因的参与者,他们参加了一个更大的社区艾滋病/性病预防和研究项目,目标是高危非洲裔美国人。他们被要求返回进行一系列为期2-5天的四次促进健康教育课程,以及6个月和1年的随访评估。这个项目最困难的方面是没有参加第二次助推器会议;参加至少两次疗程的研究参与者更有可能参加所有疗程并完成整个漫长的项目。项目主管在第一次公共场合访问后随机接近一些参与者,并短暂地触摸他们,作为握手的一部分;然后,主任要求他们回来参加后续会议。他们是否被接近是随机的。分析包括描述性统计和非参数统计。结果:在被要求返回并被触摸的参与者中,有93%的人在第二阶段返回;只有75%的人在被要求这么做但没有被碰触的情况下回来了。在第二阶段的回归参与者中,被触摸和服从在统计学上有显著差异(p < 0.01),尽管触摸/请求似乎更多的是预防作用而不是促进作用。除年龄(年龄较大的参与者)外,排除了无关的人口统计学和背景因素,年龄的影响较小。结论:结果表明,“锚定”到社会可接受的公众接触的请求在提高项目参与和参与方面是有希望的。讨论了未来研究的局限性和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Tactile Contact as a Marketing Tool for Improving an HIV/STD Education Program's Compliance / Retention with Crack Cocaine Users.

Tactile Contact as a Marketing Tool for Improving an HIV/STD Education Program's Compliance / Retention with Crack Cocaine Users.

Background: This research brief reports results from an exploratory pilot study on the use of socially acceptable touch in a public setting that accompanies a request to improve program compliance with "street level" crack cocaine users.

Methods: Study participants consisted of 120 crack cocaine-using participants in a larger community-based HIV/STD prevention and research program targeting at-risk African-Americans. They were required to return for a series of four booster health education sessions over 2-5 days and 6 month and 1 year follow-up assessments. The most difficult aspect of this program was no-shows for the second booster session; study participants who attended at least two sessions were much more likely to attend all sessions and complete the entire lengthy program. The program director randomly approached some participants after the first visit in a public setting and briefly touched them as part of a handshake; then, the director asked them to return for their follow-up sessions. Whether they were approached or not was random. Analysis comprised descriptive and non-parametric statistics.

Results: Ninety-three percent of participants who were asked to return and were touched returned for the second session; only 75% returned who had been asked to do so but were not touched. A statistically significant difference favored being touched and complying, as measured by second-session returning participants (p < .01), though it appeared the touch / request had more of a preventive than a promotional effect. Extraneous demographic and background factors were ruled out with the exception of age (older participants), which contributed slightly.

Conclusions: Results suggest that a request "anchored" to a socially acceptable public touch is promising in terms of improving program participation and engagement. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信