路径摄动分析计算方法的比较综述:动力学和拓扑视角

IF 3.743 Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Q. Vanhaelen, A. M. Aliper and A. Zhavoronkov
{"title":"路径摄动分析计算方法的比较综述:动力学和拓扑视角","authors":"Q. Vanhaelen, A. M. Aliper and A. Zhavoronkov","doi":"10.1039/C7MB00170C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Stem cells offer great promise within the field of regenerative medicine but despite encouraging results, the large scale use of stem cells for therapeutic applications still faces challenges when it comes to controlling signaling pathway responses with respect to environmental perturbations. This step is critical for the elaboration of stable and reproducible differentiation protocols, and computational modeling can be helpful to overcome these difficulties. This article is a comparative review of the mechanism-based methods used for hypothesis-driven approaches and data-driven methods which are two types of computational approaches commonly used for analysing the dynamics of pathways involved in stem cell regulation. We firstly review works based on kinetic modelling. We emphasize the relationships between the dynamics of these pathways and their topological features, and illustrative examples are described to show how the analysis of these relationships can contribute to a more detailed and formal understanding of the signaling dynamics. This discussion is followed by a review of the recent data-driven pathway analysis methods. Based on a simplified description of the pathways, these methods are able to handle high dimensionality data, and topological features of the pathways taken into account in the latest methods improve both accuracy and predictive power. Nevertheless, progress is still needed to clarify the biological meaning of the topological decompositions used by these methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":90,"journal":{"name":"Molecular BioSystems","volume":" 9","pages":" 1692-1704"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7430,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/C7MB00170C","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative review of computational methods for pathway perturbation analysis: dynamical and topological perspectives†\",\"authors\":\"Q. Vanhaelen, A. M. Aliper and A. Zhavoronkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/C7MB00170C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Stem cells offer great promise within the field of regenerative medicine but despite encouraging results, the large scale use of stem cells for therapeutic applications still faces challenges when it comes to controlling signaling pathway responses with respect to environmental perturbations. This step is critical for the elaboration of stable and reproducible differentiation protocols, and computational modeling can be helpful to overcome these difficulties. This article is a comparative review of the mechanism-based methods used for hypothesis-driven approaches and data-driven methods which are two types of computational approaches commonly used for analysing the dynamics of pathways involved in stem cell regulation. We firstly review works based on kinetic modelling. We emphasize the relationships between the dynamics of these pathways and their topological features, and illustrative examples are described to show how the analysis of these relationships can contribute to a more detailed and formal understanding of the signaling dynamics. This discussion is followed by a review of the recent data-driven pathway analysis methods. Based on a simplified description of the pathways, these methods are able to handle high dimensionality data, and topological features of the pathways taken into account in the latest methods improve both accuracy and predictive power. Nevertheless, progress is still needed to clarify the biological meaning of the topological decompositions used by these methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular BioSystems\",\"volume\":\" 9\",\"pages\":\" 1692-1704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7430,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/C7MB00170C\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular BioSystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2017/mb/c7mb00170c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular BioSystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2017/mb/c7mb00170c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

干细胞在再生医学领域提供了巨大的希望,但尽管取得了令人鼓舞的结果,干细胞在治疗应用中的大规模应用仍然面临着挑战,当涉及到控制与环境扰动相关的信号通路反应时。这一步对于制定稳定和可重复的分化协议至关重要,计算建模可以帮助克服这些困难。本文对基于机制的方法进行了比较回顾,这些方法用于假设驱动方法和数据驱动方法,这两种类型的计算方法通常用于分析参与干细胞调节的途径的动力学。我们首先回顾了基于动力学建模的研究。我们强调了这些通路的动力学和它们的拓扑特征之间的关系,并描述了说明性的例子来说明这些关系的分析如何有助于更详细和正式地理解信号动力学。讨论之后是对最近数据驱动的通路分析方法的回顾。这些方法基于对路径的简化描述,能够处理高维数据,并且在最新的方法中考虑了路径的拓扑特征,提高了准确性和预测能力。然而,仍需进一步阐明这些方法所使用的拓扑分解的生物学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A comparative review of computational methods for pathway perturbation analysis: dynamical and topological perspectives†

A comparative review of computational methods for pathway perturbation analysis: dynamical and topological perspectives†

Stem cells offer great promise within the field of regenerative medicine but despite encouraging results, the large scale use of stem cells for therapeutic applications still faces challenges when it comes to controlling signaling pathway responses with respect to environmental perturbations. This step is critical for the elaboration of stable and reproducible differentiation protocols, and computational modeling can be helpful to overcome these difficulties. This article is a comparative review of the mechanism-based methods used for hypothesis-driven approaches and data-driven methods which are two types of computational approaches commonly used for analysing the dynamics of pathways involved in stem cell regulation. We firstly review works based on kinetic modelling. We emphasize the relationships between the dynamics of these pathways and their topological features, and illustrative examples are described to show how the analysis of these relationships can contribute to a more detailed and formal understanding of the signaling dynamics. This discussion is followed by a review of the recent data-driven pathway analysis methods. Based on a simplified description of the pathways, these methods are able to handle high dimensionality data, and topological features of the pathways taken into account in the latest methods improve both accuracy and predictive power. Nevertheless, progress is still needed to clarify the biological meaning of the topological decompositions used by these methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular BioSystems
Molecular BioSystems 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
2.94
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Omics publishes molecular level experimental and bioinformatics research in the -omics sciences, including genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics. We will also welcome multidisciplinary papers presenting studies combining different types of omics, or the interface of omics and other fields such as systems biology or chemical biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信