比较射血分数降低和保留的伴有或不伴有2型糖尿病的心力衰竭患者住院费用。

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism Pub Date : 2020-02-21 eCollection Date: 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1097/XCE.0000000000000190
Natalia Olchanski, Amanda R Vest, Joshua T Cohen, David DeNofrio
{"title":"比较射血分数降低和保留的伴有或不伴有2型糖尿病的心力衰竭患者住院费用。","authors":"Natalia Olchanski,&nbsp;Amanda R Vest,&nbsp;Joshua T Cohen,&nbsp;David DeNofrio","doi":"10.1097/XCE.0000000000000190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) account for major healthcare expenditures. We evaluated inpatient expenditures and cost drivers in patients admitted with HF with and without DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created a retrospective cohort of acutely decompensated HF patients, using linked data from cost accounting systems and electronic medical records. We stratified patients by LVEF into reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF ≤40%) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, LVEF >40%) groups and by DM status at admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our population had 544 people: 285 HFrEF patients (43.5% with DM) and 259 HFpEF patients (43.6% with DM). Patients with HFrEF and DM had the longest hospital stay (5.10 ± 5.21 days). Patients with HFrEF and DM had the highest hospitalization cost ($11 576 ± 15 818). HFrEF and HFpEF patients with DM had the highest cost, and cost per day alive was highest for HFpEF patients with DM [$3153 (95% CI 2332, 4262)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall cost was higher for patients with DM, whether or not they were admitted with acute HF due to HFrEF or HFpEF. Cost per day alive for patients with DM continued to exceed corresponding costs for patients without DM, with HFpEF patients with DM having the highest cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":43231,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"9 1","pages":"17-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000190","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing inpatient costs of heart failure admissions for patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction with or without type 2 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Olchanski,&nbsp;Amanda R Vest,&nbsp;Joshua T Cohen,&nbsp;David DeNofrio\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XCE.0000000000000190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Both heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) account for major healthcare expenditures. We evaluated inpatient expenditures and cost drivers in patients admitted with HF with and without DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created a retrospective cohort of acutely decompensated HF patients, using linked data from cost accounting systems and electronic medical records. We stratified patients by LVEF into reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF ≤40%) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, LVEF >40%) groups and by DM status at admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our population had 544 people: 285 HFrEF patients (43.5% with DM) and 259 HFpEF patients (43.6% with DM). Patients with HFrEF and DM had the longest hospital stay (5.10 ± 5.21 days). Patients with HFrEF and DM had the highest hospitalization cost ($11 576 ± 15 818). HFrEF and HFpEF patients with DM had the highest cost, and cost per day alive was highest for HFpEF patients with DM [$3153 (95% CI 2332, 4262)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall cost was higher for patients with DM, whether or not they were admitted with acute HF due to HFrEF or HFpEF. Cost per day alive for patients with DM continued to exceed corresponding costs for patients without DM, with HFpEF patients with DM having the highest cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"17-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000190\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

心力衰竭(HF)和糖尿病(DM)都是主要的医疗支出。我们评估了合并和不合并dm的心力衰竭住院患者的住院费用和成本驱动因素。方法:我们创建了一个急性失代偿心力衰竭患者的回顾性队列,使用成本会计系统和电子医疗记录的相关数据。我们根据LVEF将患者分为射血分数降低组(HFrEF, LVEF≤40%)和保留射血分数组(HFpEF, LVEF >40%)以及入院时的糖尿病状态。结果:544人:HFrEF患者285例(43.5%合并糖尿病),HFpEF患者259例(43.6%合并糖尿病)。HFrEF合并DM患者住院时间最长(5.10±5.21 d)。HFrEF和DM患者的住院费用最高(11 576±15 818美元)。HFrEF和HFpEF合并DM患者的成本最高,HFpEF合并DM患者的每日生存成本最高[3153美元(95% CI 2332, 4262)]。结论:DM患者的总成本更高,无论他们是因HFrEF还是HFpEF而入院的急性HF。糖尿病患者的每日生存成本继续超过非糖尿病患者的相应成本,其中HFpEF合并糖尿病患者的成本最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing inpatient costs of heart failure admissions for patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction with or without type 2 diabetes.

Both heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) account for major healthcare expenditures. We evaluated inpatient expenditures and cost drivers in patients admitted with HF with and without DM.

Methods: We created a retrospective cohort of acutely decompensated HF patients, using linked data from cost accounting systems and electronic medical records. We stratified patients by LVEF into reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF ≤40%) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, LVEF >40%) groups and by DM status at admission.

Results: Our population had 544 people: 285 HFrEF patients (43.5% with DM) and 259 HFpEF patients (43.6% with DM). Patients with HFrEF and DM had the longest hospital stay (5.10 ± 5.21 days). Patients with HFrEF and DM had the highest hospitalization cost ($11 576 ± 15 818). HFrEF and HFpEF patients with DM had the highest cost, and cost per day alive was highest for HFpEF patients with DM [$3153 (95% CI 2332, 4262)].

Conclusion: Overall cost was higher for patients with DM, whether or not they were admitted with acute HF due to HFrEF or HFpEF. Cost per day alive for patients with DM continued to exceed corresponding costs for patients without DM, with HFpEF patients with DM having the highest cost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism
Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信