甘露醛酸在低危和中危骨髓增生异常综合征中的作用。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2020-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-02-16 DOI:10.1002/jcph.1587
Afshin Ghaderi, Sayyed Reza Safaee Nodehi, Tahereh Bakhtiari, Mona Aslani, Zahra Aghazadeh, Hidenori Matsuo, Bernd H A Rehm, Salvatore Cuzzocrea, Abbas Mirshafiey
{"title":"甘露醛酸在低危和中危骨髓增生异常综合征中的作用。","authors":"Afshin Ghaderi,&nbsp;Sayyed Reza Safaee Nodehi,&nbsp;Tahereh Bakhtiari,&nbsp;Mona Aslani,&nbsp;Zahra Aghazadeh,&nbsp;Hidenori Matsuo,&nbsp;Bernd H A Rehm,&nbsp;Salvatore Cuzzocrea,&nbsp;Abbas Mirshafiey","doi":"10.1002/jcph.1587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discovery of hematologic improvement and bone marrow modification by the drug β-D mannuronic acid (M2000) during treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in phase 1/2/3 clinical trials prompted us to design a new trial to target hematologic deficits in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In this open-label, randomized phase 2 clinical trial, the potential effect and tolerability of drug M2000 was assessed in patients with low- and intermediate-1-risk MDS. The primary efficacy end point was hematologic improvement after 12 weeks of β-D-mannuronic acid therapy. Among 34 enrolled patients, half received their conventional therapy plus β-D-mannuronic acid, and the other half received only conventional drugs. In the conventional + β-D mannuronic acid treatment group, hematologic improvement and development of transfusion independence and/or reduction in transfusion requirements were seen in 12 patients (92.3%) and 1 patient (7.7%), respectively. Moreover, 5 patients (38.5%), 2 patients (15.4%), and 1 patient (7.7%) in the β-D-mannuronic acid-treated group showed hematologic improvement of the major parameters of erythroid, neutrophil, and platelet responses, respectively, based on the International Working Group criteria), whereas in the conventional treatment group as control, no hematologic improvements including erythroid, neutrophil, and platelet response was seen. In this trial, the addition of β-D mannuronic acid to conventional treatment showed promising results in MDS patients with low and intermediate-1 risk with effects on hematologic improvements without significant adverse effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":15536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"879-888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jcph.1587","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mannuronic Acid in Low-Risk and Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes.\",\"authors\":\"Afshin Ghaderi,&nbsp;Sayyed Reza Safaee Nodehi,&nbsp;Tahereh Bakhtiari,&nbsp;Mona Aslani,&nbsp;Zahra Aghazadeh,&nbsp;Hidenori Matsuo,&nbsp;Bernd H A Rehm,&nbsp;Salvatore Cuzzocrea,&nbsp;Abbas Mirshafiey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcph.1587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The discovery of hematologic improvement and bone marrow modification by the drug β-D mannuronic acid (M2000) during treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in phase 1/2/3 clinical trials prompted us to design a new trial to target hematologic deficits in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In this open-label, randomized phase 2 clinical trial, the potential effect and tolerability of drug M2000 was assessed in patients with low- and intermediate-1-risk MDS. The primary efficacy end point was hematologic improvement after 12 weeks of β-D-mannuronic acid therapy. Among 34 enrolled patients, half received their conventional therapy plus β-D-mannuronic acid, and the other half received only conventional drugs. In the conventional + β-D mannuronic acid treatment group, hematologic improvement and development of transfusion independence and/or reduction in transfusion requirements were seen in 12 patients (92.3%) and 1 patient (7.7%), respectively. Moreover, 5 patients (38.5%), 2 patients (15.4%), and 1 patient (7.7%) in the β-D-mannuronic acid-treated group showed hematologic improvement of the major parameters of erythroid, neutrophil, and platelet responses, respectively, based on the International Working Group criteria), whereas in the conventional treatment group as control, no hematologic improvements including erythroid, neutrophil, and platelet response was seen. In this trial, the addition of β-D mannuronic acid to conventional treatment showed promising results in MDS patients with low and intermediate-1 risk with effects on hematologic improvements without significant adverse effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"879-888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jcph.1587\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1587\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/2/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在1/2/3期临床试验中,药物β-D甘露醛酸(M2000)在类风湿关节炎治疗中的血液学改善和骨髓修饰的发现促使我们设计了一项针对骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)血液学缺陷的新试验。在这项开放标签、随机化的2期临床试验中,评估了药物M2000在低危和中危MDS患者中的潜在作用和耐受性。主要疗效终点为β- d -甘露醛酸治疗12周后血液学改善。在34名入组患者中,一半接受常规治疗加β- d -甘露醛酸,另一半只接受常规药物治疗。在常规+ β-D甘露醛酸治疗组中,分别有12例(92.3%)和1例(7.7%)患者血液学改善、输血独立性发展和/或输血需求减少。此外,β- d-甘露醛酸治疗组有5例(38.5%)、2例(15.4%)和1例(7.7%)患者的血液学指标(红细胞、中性粒细胞和血小板反应)均有改善(基于国际工作组标准),而常规治疗组作为对照,红细胞、中性粒细胞和血小板反应均未见改善。在本试验中,在常规治疗中加入β-D甘露醛酸对低、中危MDS患者的血液学改善效果良好,无明显不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mannuronic Acid in Low-Risk and Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

The discovery of hematologic improvement and bone marrow modification by the drug β-D mannuronic acid (M2000) during treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in phase 1/2/3 clinical trials prompted us to design a new trial to target hematologic deficits in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In this open-label, randomized phase 2 clinical trial, the potential effect and tolerability of drug M2000 was assessed in patients with low- and intermediate-1-risk MDS. The primary efficacy end point was hematologic improvement after 12 weeks of β-D-mannuronic acid therapy. Among 34 enrolled patients, half received their conventional therapy plus β-D-mannuronic acid, and the other half received only conventional drugs. In the conventional + β-D mannuronic acid treatment group, hematologic improvement and development of transfusion independence and/or reduction in transfusion requirements were seen in 12 patients (92.3%) and 1 patient (7.7%), respectively. Moreover, 5 patients (38.5%), 2 patients (15.4%), and 1 patient (7.7%) in the β-D-mannuronic acid-treated group showed hematologic improvement of the major parameters of erythroid, neutrophil, and platelet responses, respectively, based on the International Working Group criteria), whereas in the conventional treatment group as control, no hematologic improvements including erythroid, neutrophil, and platelet response was seen. In this trial, the addition of β-D mannuronic acid to conventional treatment showed promising results in MDS patients with low and intermediate-1 risk with effects on hematologic improvements without significant adverse effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
176
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信