评估自动腹膜透析的远程患者监测程序。

Juan G Ariza, Surrey M Walton, Mauricio Sanabria, Alfonso Bunch, Jasmin Vesga, Angela Rivera
{"title":"评估自动腹膜透析的远程患者监测程序。","authors":"Juan G Ariza,&nbsp;Surrey M Walton,&nbsp;Mauricio Sanabria,&nbsp;Alfonso Bunch,&nbsp;Jasmin Vesga,&nbsp;Angela Rivera","doi":"10.1177/0896860819896880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefits of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) have been established, but patient adherence to treatment remains a concern. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs are a potential solution; however, the cost implications are not well established. This study modeled, from the payer perspective, expected net costs and clinical consequences of a novel RPM program in Colombia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Amarkov model was used to project costs and clinical outcomes for APD patients with and without RPM. Clinical inputs were directly estimated from Renal Care Services data or taken from the literature. Dialysis costs were estimated from national fees. Inpatient costs were obtained from a recent Colombian study. The model projected overall direct costs and several clinical outcomes. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA and PSA) were also conducted to characterize uncertainty in the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model projected that the implementation of an RPM program costing US$35 per month in a cohort of 100 APD patients over 1 year would save US$121,233. The model also projected 31 additional months free of complications, 27 fewer hospitalizations, 518 fewer hospitalization days, and 6 fewer peritonitis episodes. In the DSA, results were most sensitive to hospitalization rates and days of hospitalization, but cost savings were robust. The PSA found there was a 91% chance for the RPM program to be cost saving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the model suggest that RPM is cost-effective in APD patients which should be verified by a rigorous prospective cost analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":519220,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":"377-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0896860819896880","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a remote patient monitoring program for automated peritoneal dialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Juan G Ariza,&nbsp;Surrey M Walton,&nbsp;Mauricio Sanabria,&nbsp;Alfonso Bunch,&nbsp;Jasmin Vesga,&nbsp;Angela Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0896860819896880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefits of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) have been established, but patient adherence to treatment remains a concern. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs are a potential solution; however, the cost implications are not well established. This study modeled, from the payer perspective, expected net costs and clinical consequences of a novel RPM program in Colombia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Amarkov model was used to project costs and clinical outcomes for APD patients with and without RPM. Clinical inputs were directly estimated from Renal Care Services data or taken from the literature. Dialysis costs were estimated from national fees. Inpatient costs were obtained from a recent Colombian study. The model projected overall direct costs and several clinical outcomes. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA and PSA) were also conducted to characterize uncertainty in the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model projected that the implementation of an RPM program costing US$35 per month in a cohort of 100 APD patients over 1 year would save US$121,233. The model also projected 31 additional months free of complications, 27 fewer hospitalizations, 518 fewer hospitalization days, and 6 fewer peritonitis episodes. In the DSA, results were most sensitive to hospitalization rates and days of hospitalization, but cost savings were robust. The PSA found there was a 91% chance for the RPM program to be cost saving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the model suggest that RPM is cost-effective in APD patients which should be verified by a rigorous prospective cost analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"377-383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0896860819896880\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860819896880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860819896880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

背景:自动腹膜透析(APD)的益处已经确立,但患者对治疗的依从性仍然是一个问题。远程病人监护(RPM)程序是一个潜在的解决方案;然而,所涉费用尚未得到充分确定。本研究从付款人的角度模拟了哥伦比亚一项新型RPM计划的预期净成本和临床后果。方法:采用Amarkov模型预测APD合并和不合并RPM患者的成本和临床预后。临床投入直接从肾脏护理服务数据或文献中估计。透析费用是根据国家收费估算的。住院费用来自哥伦比亚最近的一项研究。该模型预测了总体直接成本和几种临床结果。还进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析(DSA和PSA)来表征结果的不确定性。结果:该模型预测,在100名APD患者中实施每月35美元的RPM计划,1年内将节省121,233美元。该模型还预测了31个月无并发症,27次住院,518天住院,6次腹膜炎发作。在DSA中,结果对住院率和住院天数最敏感,但成本节约是强劲的。PSA发现RPM程序有91%的机会可以节省成本。结论:该模型的结果表明RPM在APD患者中具有成本效益,这需要通过严格的前瞻性成本分析来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating a remote patient monitoring program for automated peritoneal dialysis.

Background: The benefits of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) have been established, but patient adherence to treatment remains a concern. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs are a potential solution; however, the cost implications are not well established. This study modeled, from the payer perspective, expected net costs and clinical consequences of a novel RPM program in Colombia.

Methods: Amarkov model was used to project costs and clinical outcomes for APD patients with and without RPM. Clinical inputs were directly estimated from Renal Care Services data or taken from the literature. Dialysis costs were estimated from national fees. Inpatient costs were obtained from a recent Colombian study. The model projected overall direct costs and several clinical outcomes. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA and PSA) were also conducted to characterize uncertainty in the results.

Results: The model projected that the implementation of an RPM program costing US$35 per month in a cohort of 100 APD patients over 1 year would save US$121,233. The model also projected 31 additional months free of complications, 27 fewer hospitalizations, 518 fewer hospitalization days, and 6 fewer peritonitis episodes. In the DSA, results were most sensitive to hospitalization rates and days of hospitalization, but cost savings were robust. The PSA found there was a 91% chance for the RPM program to be cost saving.

Conclusion: The results of the model suggest that RPM is cost-effective in APD patients which should be verified by a rigorous prospective cost analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信