在18个国家使用多阶段CT方案:适当性和辐射剂量。

Shivam Rastogi, Ramandeep Singh, Riddhi Borse, Petra Valkovic Zujic, Doris Segota, Ana Diklic, Slaven Jurkovic, Antar Ali, Hassan Mohammed Kharita, Huda M Al-Naemi, Jokha Alkalbani, Amaal Al-Rasbi, Vesna Gershan, Stipe Galic, Mohammad Yusuf, Simona Avramova-Cholakova, Ili Majidah Binti Hj Zulkipli, Nilar Shein, Seife Teferi, Madan M Rehani, Jenia Vassileva, Mannudeep K Kalra
{"title":"在18个国家使用多阶段CT方案:适当性和辐射剂量。","authors":"Shivam Rastogi,&nbsp;Ramandeep Singh,&nbsp;Riddhi Borse,&nbsp;Petra Valkovic Zujic,&nbsp;Doris Segota,&nbsp;Ana Diklic,&nbsp;Slaven Jurkovic,&nbsp;Antar Ali,&nbsp;Hassan Mohammed Kharita,&nbsp;Huda M Al-Naemi,&nbsp;Jokha Alkalbani,&nbsp;Amaal Al-Rasbi,&nbsp;Vesna Gershan,&nbsp;Stipe Galic,&nbsp;Mohammad Yusuf,&nbsp;Simona Avramova-Cholakova,&nbsp;Ili Majidah Binti Hj Zulkipli,&nbsp;Nilar Shein,&nbsp;Seife Teferi,&nbsp;Madan M Rehani,&nbsp;Jenia Vassileva,&nbsp;Mannudeep K Kalra","doi":"10.1177/0846537119888390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the frequency, appropriateness, and radiation doses associated with multiphase computed tomography (CT) protocols for routine chest and abdomen-pelvis examinations in 18 countries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency, multi-institutional data on clinical indications, number of scan phases, scan parameters, and radiation dose descriptors (CT dose-index volume; dose-length product [DLP]) were collected for routine chest (n = 1706 patients) and abdomen-pelvis (n = 426 patients) CT from 18 institutions in Asia, Africa, and Europe. Two radiologists scored the need for each phase based on clinical indications (1 = not indicated, 2 = probably indicated, 3 = indicated). We surveyed 11 institutions for their practice regarding single-phase and multiphase CT examinations. Data were analyzed with the Student <i>t</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most institutions use multiphase protocols for routine chest (10/18 institutions) and routine abdomen-pelvis (10/11 institutions that supplied data for abdomen-pelvis) CT examinations. Most institutions (10/11) do not modify scan parameters between different scan phases. Respective total DLP for 1-, 2-, and 3-phase routine chest CT was 272, 518, and 820 mGy·cm, respectively. Corresponding values for 1- to 5-phase routine abdomen-pelvis CT were 400, 726, 1218, 1214, and 1458 mGy cm, respectively. For multiphase CT protocols, there were no differences in scan parameters and radiation doses between different phases for either chest or abdomen-pelvis CT (<i>P</i> = 0.40-0.99). Multiphase CT examinations were unnecessary in 100% of routine chest CT and in 63% of routine abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiphase scan protocols for the routine chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations are unnecessary, and their use increases radiation dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":444006,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes","volume":" ","pages":"381-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0846537119888390","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Multiphase CT Protocols in 18 Countries: Appropriateness and Radiation Doses.\",\"authors\":\"Shivam Rastogi,&nbsp;Ramandeep Singh,&nbsp;Riddhi Borse,&nbsp;Petra Valkovic Zujic,&nbsp;Doris Segota,&nbsp;Ana Diklic,&nbsp;Slaven Jurkovic,&nbsp;Antar Ali,&nbsp;Hassan Mohammed Kharita,&nbsp;Huda M Al-Naemi,&nbsp;Jokha Alkalbani,&nbsp;Amaal Al-Rasbi,&nbsp;Vesna Gershan,&nbsp;Stipe Galic,&nbsp;Mohammad Yusuf,&nbsp;Simona Avramova-Cholakova,&nbsp;Ili Majidah Binti Hj Zulkipli,&nbsp;Nilar Shein,&nbsp;Seife Teferi,&nbsp;Madan M Rehani,&nbsp;Jenia Vassileva,&nbsp;Mannudeep K Kalra\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0846537119888390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the frequency, appropriateness, and radiation doses associated with multiphase computed tomography (CT) protocols for routine chest and abdomen-pelvis examinations in 18 countries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency, multi-institutional data on clinical indications, number of scan phases, scan parameters, and radiation dose descriptors (CT dose-index volume; dose-length product [DLP]) were collected for routine chest (n = 1706 patients) and abdomen-pelvis (n = 426 patients) CT from 18 institutions in Asia, Africa, and Europe. Two radiologists scored the need for each phase based on clinical indications (1 = not indicated, 2 = probably indicated, 3 = indicated). We surveyed 11 institutions for their practice regarding single-phase and multiphase CT examinations. Data were analyzed with the Student <i>t</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most institutions use multiphase protocols for routine chest (10/18 institutions) and routine abdomen-pelvis (10/11 institutions that supplied data for abdomen-pelvis) CT examinations. Most institutions (10/11) do not modify scan parameters between different scan phases. Respective total DLP for 1-, 2-, and 3-phase routine chest CT was 272, 518, and 820 mGy·cm, respectively. Corresponding values for 1- to 5-phase routine abdomen-pelvis CT were 400, 726, 1218, 1214, and 1458 mGy cm, respectively. For multiphase CT protocols, there were no differences in scan parameters and radiation doses between different phases for either chest or abdomen-pelvis CT (<i>P</i> = 0.40-0.99). Multiphase CT examinations were unnecessary in 100% of routine chest CT and in 63% of routine abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiphase scan protocols for the routine chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations are unnecessary, and their use increases radiation dose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":444006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"381-387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0846537119888390\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537119888390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537119888390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目的:评估18个国家的常规胸部和腹部骨盆检查中多相计算机断层扫描(CT)方案的频率、适当性和辐射剂量。材料和方法:与国际原子能机构合作,收集有关临床适应症、扫描阶段数、扫描参数和辐射剂量描述符(CT剂量指数体积;收集了来自亚洲、非洲和欧洲18家机构的常规胸部(n = 1706例)和腹部-骨盆(n = 426例)CT。两名放射科医生根据临床适应症对每个阶段的需要进行评分(1 =不需要,2 =可能需要,3 =需要)。我们调查了11家机构对单相和多相CT检查的做法。数据采用Student t检验进行分析。结果:大多数机构对常规胸部(10/18家机构)和常规腹部-骨盆(10/11家提供腹部-骨盆数据的机构)CT检查采用多阶段方案。大多数机构(10/11)在不同扫描阶段之间不修改扫描参数。1期、2期、3期常规胸部CT总DLP分别为272、518、820 mGy·cm。1 ~ 5期腹部-骨盆常规CT对应值分别为400、726、1218、1214、1458 mGy cm。对于多期CT方案,无论是胸部还是腹部-骨盆CT,不同阶段的扫描参数和辐射剂量均无差异(P = 0.40-0.99)。100%的胸部CT常规检查和63%的腹部-骨盆CT常规检查不需要多期CT检查。结论:在常规胸部和腹部骨盆CT检查中,多相扫描方案是不必要的,且其使用会增加辐射剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Multiphase CT Protocols in 18 Countries: Appropriateness and Radiation Doses.

Purpose: To assess the frequency, appropriateness, and radiation doses associated with multiphase computed tomography (CT) protocols for routine chest and abdomen-pelvis examinations in 18 countries.

Materials and methods: In collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency, multi-institutional data on clinical indications, number of scan phases, scan parameters, and radiation dose descriptors (CT dose-index volume; dose-length product [DLP]) were collected for routine chest (n = 1706 patients) and abdomen-pelvis (n = 426 patients) CT from 18 institutions in Asia, Africa, and Europe. Two radiologists scored the need for each phase based on clinical indications (1 = not indicated, 2 = probably indicated, 3 = indicated). We surveyed 11 institutions for their practice regarding single-phase and multiphase CT examinations. Data were analyzed with the Student t test.

Results: Most institutions use multiphase protocols for routine chest (10/18 institutions) and routine abdomen-pelvis (10/11 institutions that supplied data for abdomen-pelvis) CT examinations. Most institutions (10/11) do not modify scan parameters between different scan phases. Respective total DLP for 1-, 2-, and 3-phase routine chest CT was 272, 518, and 820 mGy·cm, respectively. Corresponding values for 1- to 5-phase routine abdomen-pelvis CT were 400, 726, 1218, 1214, and 1458 mGy cm, respectively. For multiphase CT protocols, there were no differences in scan parameters and radiation doses between different phases for either chest or abdomen-pelvis CT (P = 0.40-0.99). Multiphase CT examinations were unnecessary in 100% of routine chest CT and in 63% of routine abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.

Conclusions: Multiphase scan protocols for the routine chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations are unnecessary, and their use increases radiation dose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信