下轴脊柱外伤手术后颈椎前凸:与颈部疼痛和僵硬的关系。

IF 0.4 Q4 SURGERY
Giornale di Chirurgia Pub Date : 2019-11-01
M Dobran, D Nasi, R Benigni, R Colasanti, M Gladi, M Iacoangeli
{"title":"下轴脊柱外伤手术后颈椎前凸:与颈部疼痛和僵硬的关系。","authors":"M Dobran,&nbsp;D Nasi,&nbsp;R Benigni,&nbsp;R Colasanti,&nbsp;M Gladi,&nbsp;M Iacoangeli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate how neck pain is influenced by post-operative cervical alignment in patients operated for cervical spinal trauma.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From January 2013 to June 2017, at our department we operated 34 patients with cervical spinal trauma, 22 males and 12 females. Age, sex, level and type of fractures, surgical approach, fixation levels (cervical or cervico-dorsal), preoperative and postoperative CT scan, cervical (C2-C7) Cobb angle (lordotic > +10°, straight 0 /+10°, kyphotic < 0°) at X-rays on sitting position 3 months after surgery, postoperative self-reported neck stiffness scale, preoperative and follow-up ASIA score, pre and postoperative VAS value were evaluated for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed according to the Mann-Whitney and T-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this series, 22 patients were operated by anterior approach, 7 patients by posterior approach and 5 by combined approach. Postoperative chronic cervical pain was not correlated with cervical sagittal alignment after surgery, fracture type, surgical approach, fixation level and postoperative ASIA score but is correlated with the presence of neck stiffness (P=0,001). Patients treated with posterior approach (P=0,022) and fracture type C (P=0,026) had higher significantly neck stiffness compared to patients who underwent anterior approach for type B fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of abnormal cervical lordosis after surgery for cervical spinal trauma does not correlate with neck pain. Patients treated with posterior fixation had higher neck stiffness and related chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":46352,"journal":{"name":"Giornale di Chirurgia","volume":"40 6","pages":"513-519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical lordosis after subaxial spinal trauma surgery: relationship with neck pain and stiffness.\",\"authors\":\"M Dobran,&nbsp;D Nasi,&nbsp;R Benigni,&nbsp;R Colasanti,&nbsp;M Gladi,&nbsp;M Iacoangeli\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate how neck pain is influenced by post-operative cervical alignment in patients operated for cervical spinal trauma.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From January 2013 to June 2017, at our department we operated 34 patients with cervical spinal trauma, 22 males and 12 females. Age, sex, level and type of fractures, surgical approach, fixation levels (cervical or cervico-dorsal), preoperative and postoperative CT scan, cervical (C2-C7) Cobb angle (lordotic > +10°, straight 0 /+10°, kyphotic < 0°) at X-rays on sitting position 3 months after surgery, postoperative self-reported neck stiffness scale, preoperative and follow-up ASIA score, pre and postoperative VAS value were evaluated for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed according to the Mann-Whitney and T-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this series, 22 patients were operated by anterior approach, 7 patients by posterior approach and 5 by combined approach. Postoperative chronic cervical pain was not correlated with cervical sagittal alignment after surgery, fracture type, surgical approach, fixation level and postoperative ASIA score but is correlated with the presence of neck stiffness (P=0,001). Patients treated with posterior approach (P=0,022) and fracture type C (P=0,026) had higher significantly neck stiffness compared to patients who underwent anterior approach for type B fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of abnormal cervical lordosis after surgery for cervical spinal trauma does not correlate with neck pain. Patients treated with posterior fixation had higher neck stiffness and related chronic pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale di Chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"40 6\",\"pages\":\"513-519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale di Chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale di Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本回顾性研究的目的是评估颈椎外伤患者术后颈椎对准对颈部疼痛的影响。患者与方法:2013年1月至2017年6月,我科共收治34例颈椎外伤患者,男22例,女12例。评估每位患者的年龄、性别、骨折水平和类型、手术入路、固定水平(颈椎或颈背)、术前和术后CT扫描、术后3个月坐位x线下颈椎(C2-C7) Cobb角(前凸> +10°,直0 /+10°,后凸< 0°)、术后自述颈部僵硬量表、术前和随访ASIA评分、术前和术后VAS评分。采用Mann-Whitney检验和t检验进行统计学分析。结果:本组患者经前路入路22例,后路7例,联合入路5例。术后慢性颈椎疼痛与术后颈椎矢状位、骨折类型、手术入路、固定水平和术后ASIA评分无关,但与颈部僵硬存在相关(P= 0.001)。采用后路入路(P= 0.022)和C型骨折(P= 0.026)的患者与采用前路入路治疗B型骨折的患者相比,颈部僵硬度明显更高。结论:颈椎外伤术后异常颈椎前凸与颈部疼痛无关。后路固定治疗的患者有较高的颈部僵硬和相关的慢性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cervical lordosis after subaxial spinal trauma surgery: relationship with neck pain and stiffness.

Background: The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate how neck pain is influenced by post-operative cervical alignment in patients operated for cervical spinal trauma.

Patients and methods: From January 2013 to June 2017, at our department we operated 34 patients with cervical spinal trauma, 22 males and 12 females. Age, sex, level and type of fractures, surgical approach, fixation levels (cervical or cervico-dorsal), preoperative and postoperative CT scan, cervical (C2-C7) Cobb angle (lordotic > +10°, straight 0 /+10°, kyphotic < 0°) at X-rays on sitting position 3 months after surgery, postoperative self-reported neck stiffness scale, preoperative and follow-up ASIA score, pre and postoperative VAS value were evaluated for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed according to the Mann-Whitney and T-test.

Results: In this series, 22 patients were operated by anterior approach, 7 patients by posterior approach and 5 by combined approach. Postoperative chronic cervical pain was not correlated with cervical sagittal alignment after surgery, fracture type, surgical approach, fixation level and postoperative ASIA score but is correlated with the presence of neck stiffness (P=0,001). Patients treated with posterior approach (P=0,022) and fracture type C (P=0,026) had higher significantly neck stiffness compared to patients who underwent anterior approach for type B fractures.

Conclusions: The presence of abnormal cervical lordosis after surgery for cervical spinal trauma does not correlate with neck pain. Patients treated with posterior fixation had higher neck stiffness and related chronic pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Il Giornale di Chirurgia pubblica contributi che propongono le diverse tecniche su patologia chirurgiche di attualità. Pubblica articoli originali, casistica clinica, metodi, tecniche, terapia farmacologica pre-operatoria e post-chirurgica, ed articoli inerenti la descrizione di tecniche chirurgiche.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信