从不愉快到无法忍受——为什么以及如何在动物研究中对疼痛和其他形式的痛苦设定上限。

IF 3.1 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Ilar Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI:10.1093/ilar/ilz018
I Anna S Olsson, Christine J Nicol, Steven M Niemi, Peter Sandøe
{"title":"从不愉快到无法忍受——为什么以及如何在动物研究中对疼痛和其他形式的痛苦设定上限。","authors":"I Anna S Olsson,&nbsp;Christine J Nicol,&nbsp;Steven M Niemi,&nbsp;Peter Sandøe","doi":"10.1093/ilar/ilz018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The focus of this paper is the requirement that the use of live animals in experiments and in vivo assays should never be allowed if those uses involve severe suffering. This requirement was first implemented in Danish legislation, was later adopted by the European Union, and has had limited uptake in North America. Animal suffering can arise from exposure to a wide range of different external and internal events that threaten biological or social functions, while the severity of suffering may be influenced by the animals' perceptions of their own situation and the degree of control they are able to exert. Severe suffering is more than an incremental increase in negative state(s) but involves a qualitative shift whereby the normal mechanisms to contain or keep negative states at arm's length no longer function. The result of severe suffering will be a loss of the ability of cope. The idea of putting a cap on severe suffering may be justified from multiple ethical perspectives. In most, if not all, cases it is possible to avoid imposing severe suffering on animals during experiments without giving up the potential benefits of finding new ways to cure, prevent, or alleviate serious human diseases and generate other important knowledge. From this it follows that there is a strong ethical case to favor a regulatory ban on animal experiments involving severe suffering.</p>","PeriodicalId":56299,"journal":{"name":"Ilar Journal","volume":"60 3","pages":"404-414"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ilar/ilz018","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Unpleasant to Unbearable-Why and How to Implement an Upper Limit to Pain and Other Forms of Suffering in Research with Animals.\",\"authors\":\"I Anna S Olsson,&nbsp;Christine J Nicol,&nbsp;Steven M Niemi,&nbsp;Peter Sandøe\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ilar/ilz018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The focus of this paper is the requirement that the use of live animals in experiments and in vivo assays should never be allowed if those uses involve severe suffering. This requirement was first implemented in Danish legislation, was later adopted by the European Union, and has had limited uptake in North America. Animal suffering can arise from exposure to a wide range of different external and internal events that threaten biological or social functions, while the severity of suffering may be influenced by the animals' perceptions of their own situation and the degree of control they are able to exert. Severe suffering is more than an incremental increase in negative state(s) but involves a qualitative shift whereby the normal mechanisms to contain or keep negative states at arm's length no longer function. The result of severe suffering will be a loss of the ability of cope. The idea of putting a cap on severe suffering may be justified from multiple ethical perspectives. In most, if not all, cases it is possible to avoid imposing severe suffering on animals during experiments without giving up the potential benefits of finding new ways to cure, prevent, or alleviate serious human diseases and generate other important knowledge. From this it follows that there is a strong ethical case to favor a regulatory ban on animal experiments involving severe suffering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ilar Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"404-414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ilar/ilz018\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ilar Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilz018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilar Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilz018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本文的重点是要求在实验和体内分析中使用活体动物,如果这些使用涉及严重的痛苦,就不应该被允许。这一要求首先在丹麦立法中实施,后来被欧洲联盟采纳,并在北美得到了有限的采纳。动物的痛苦可能来自于暴露于威胁生物或社会功能的各种不同的外部和内部事件,而痛苦的严重程度可能受到动物对自身处境的感知以及它们能够施加的控制程度的影响。严重的痛苦不仅仅是消极状态的逐渐增加,而是涉及到一种质的转变,即控制或保持消极状态的正常机制不再起作用。严重痛苦的结果将是丧失应对能力。从多个伦理角度来看,限制严重痛苦的想法可能是合理的。在大多数情况下,如果不是全部的话,在不放弃寻找治疗、预防或减轻严重人类疾病的新方法和产生其他重要知识的潜在好处的情况下,在实验中避免使动物遭受严重痛苦是可能的。由此可见,有一个强有力的伦理案例支持禁止涉及严重痛苦的动物实验的监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Unpleasant to Unbearable-Why and How to Implement an Upper Limit to Pain and Other Forms of Suffering in Research with Animals.

The focus of this paper is the requirement that the use of live animals in experiments and in vivo assays should never be allowed if those uses involve severe suffering. This requirement was first implemented in Danish legislation, was later adopted by the European Union, and has had limited uptake in North America. Animal suffering can arise from exposure to a wide range of different external and internal events that threaten biological or social functions, while the severity of suffering may be influenced by the animals' perceptions of their own situation and the degree of control they are able to exert. Severe suffering is more than an incremental increase in negative state(s) but involves a qualitative shift whereby the normal mechanisms to contain or keep negative states at arm's length no longer function. The result of severe suffering will be a loss of the ability of cope. The idea of putting a cap on severe suffering may be justified from multiple ethical perspectives. In most, if not all, cases it is possible to avoid imposing severe suffering on animals during experiments without giving up the potential benefits of finding new ways to cure, prevent, or alleviate serious human diseases and generate other important knowledge. From this it follows that there is a strong ethical case to favor a regulatory ban on animal experiments involving severe suffering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ilar Journal
Ilar Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: The ILAR Journal is the peer-reviewed, theme-oriented publication of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR), which provides timely information for all who study, use, care for, and oversee the use of animals in research. The journal publishes original articles that review research on animals either as direct subjects or as surrogates for humans. According to policy, any previously unpublished animal research reported in the ILAR Journal will have been conducted according to the scientific, technical, and humanely appropriate guidelines current at the time the research was conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals or other guidance provided by taxonomically-oriented professional societies (e.g., American Society of Mammalogy) as referenced in the Guide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信