{"title":"大脑中的快速语法:来自快速平行视觉呈现范式(RPVP)的电生理证据。","authors":"Yun Wen, Jonathan Mirault, Jonathan Grainger","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2 ERP experiments participants read 4-word sequences presented for 200 ms (RPVP paradigm) and were required to decide whether the word sequences were grammatical or not. In Experiment 1, the word sequence consisted of either a grammatically correct sentence (e.g., <i>she can sing now</i>) or an ungrammatical scrambled sequence (e.g., <i>sing can now she</i>). A reduced N400 effect was obtained in the grammatically correct sequences compared to the ungrammatical sequences. In Experiment 2, the critical comparison was between 2 types of ungrammatical sequences: transposed-word sequences (e.g., <i>you that read wrong,</i> transposing 2 adjacent central words can form a grammatical sequence) and control sequences (e.g., <i>you that read worry</i>, transposing any 2 adjacent central words still forms an ungrammatical sequence). An N400 reduction was observed in the transposed-word sequences relative to the control sequences. We interpret these N400 effects as evidence that an elementary syntactic representation can be rapidly constructed on the basis of parallel processing of word identities and their parts-of-speech. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":504300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"99-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast syntax in the brain: Electrophysiological evidence from the rapid parallel visual presentation paradigm (RPVP).\",\"authors\":\"Yun Wen, Jonathan Mirault, Jonathan Grainger\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0000811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2 ERP experiments participants read 4-word sequences presented for 200 ms (RPVP paradigm) and were required to decide whether the word sequences were grammatical or not. In Experiment 1, the word sequence consisted of either a grammatically correct sentence (e.g., <i>she can sing now</i>) or an ungrammatical scrambled sequence (e.g., <i>sing can now she</i>). A reduced N400 effect was obtained in the grammatically correct sequences compared to the ungrammatical sequences. In Experiment 2, the critical comparison was between 2 types of ungrammatical sequences: transposed-word sequences (e.g., <i>you that read wrong,</i> transposing 2 adjacent central words can form a grammatical sequence) and control sequences (e.g., <i>you that read worry</i>, transposing any 2 adjacent central words still forms an ungrammatical sequence). An N400 reduction was observed in the transposed-word sequences relative to the control sequences. We interpret these N400 effects as evidence that an elementary syntactic representation can be rapidly constructed on the basis of parallel processing of word identities and their parts-of-speech. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":504300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"99-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
在2个ERP实验中,被试阅读呈现200 ms的4个单词序列(RPVP范式),并判断这些单词序列是否符合语法。在实验1中,单词序列由一个语法正确的句子(例如,她现在可以唱歌)或一个语法混乱的序列(例如,她现在可以唱歌)组成。与非语法序列相比,语法正确序列的N400效应降低。在实验2中,关键的比较是两种不符合语法的序列:转置词序列(例如,你读错了,转置两个相邻的中心词可以形成一个语法序列)和控制序列(例如,你读错了,转置两个相邻的中心词仍然形成一个不符合语法的序列)。与对照序列相比,转置词序列的N400降低。我们将这些N400效应解释为一个证据,即一个基本的句法表征可以在单词身份及其词性的并行处理的基础上快速构建。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
Fast syntax in the brain: Electrophysiological evidence from the rapid parallel visual presentation paradigm (RPVP).
In 2 ERP experiments participants read 4-word sequences presented for 200 ms (RPVP paradigm) and were required to decide whether the word sequences were grammatical or not. In Experiment 1, the word sequence consisted of either a grammatically correct sentence (e.g., she can sing now) or an ungrammatical scrambled sequence (e.g., sing can now she). A reduced N400 effect was obtained in the grammatically correct sequences compared to the ungrammatical sequences. In Experiment 2, the critical comparison was between 2 types of ungrammatical sequences: transposed-word sequences (e.g., you that read wrong, transposing 2 adjacent central words can form a grammatical sequence) and control sequences (e.g., you that read worry, transposing any 2 adjacent central words still forms an ungrammatical sequence). An N400 reduction was observed in the transposed-word sequences relative to the control sequences. We interpret these N400 effects as evidence that an elementary syntactic representation can be rapidly constructed on the basis of parallel processing of word identities and their parts-of-speech. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).